| Literature DB >> 31846116 |
Fabian Niess1,2, Albrecht Ingo Schmid1,2, Wolfgang Bogner2,3, Michael Wolzt4, Pierre Carlier5, Siegfried Trattnig2,3, Ewald Moser1,2, Martin Meyerspeer1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: MR offers the unique possibility to noninvasively investigate cellular energy metabolism via 31P MRS, while blood perfusion, which provides oxygen and substrates to the tissue, is accessible by arterial spin labeling (ASL) 1H MRI. Because metabolic and hemodynamic parameters are linked, it would be desirable to study them simultaneously. A 3D-resolved method is presented that allows such measurements with high spatiotemporal resolution and has the potential to discern differences along an exercising muscle.Entities:
Keywords: 31P MRS; energy metabolism; interleaved acquisition; muscle exercise; pH; perfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31846116 PMCID: PMC7065182 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med ISSN: 0740-3194 Impact factor: 4.668
Figure 1Coronal gradient‐echo images of the calf and typical placement of the adiabatic inversion slab (yellow), ten 1H imaging slices (red) and 31P VOIs at distal (green) and proximal (blue) position in gastrocnemius medialis (A). Schematic diagram of the pulse sequence including 1H MRI and 31P MRS, acquiring a full set of images and spectra every (B). 1H MRI comprises arterial spin labeling using FAIR tagging (alternating slice selective and global inversion) and Q2TIPS saturation schemes with multi‐slice EPI readout. 31P MR spectra are acquired from GM at two positions using multi‐voxel semi‐LASER 31P MRS
Figure 2Time series of 31P spectra simultaneously acquired during rest, plantar flexion exercise and recovery in a distal and proximal VOI in gastrocnemius medialis. The inserts show the corresponding mono‐exponential PCr recovery fits (A). End‐exercise PCr depletion (), end‐exercise pH, and PCr recovery time constants () for each subject at distal and proximal position (B). The bold line represents mean ± SD
Parameters derived from data acquired at distal and proximal position in GM using the interleaved 1H/31P acquisition scheme: voxel size, linewidth, end‐exercise PCr depletion (), end‐exercise pH (), calculated PCr recovery time constant (), postexercise perfusion (averaged 60 ‐ 300 s), and ‐weighted peak values given as mean ± SD over all subjects
| 31P MRS |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Voxel size (mL) | 27 ± 3 | 32 ± 7 |
| Linewidth (Hz) | 10 ± 3 | 12 ± 4 |
| End‐exercise PCr depletion (%) | 71 ± 21 | 77 ± 18 |
|
| 6.86 ± 0.16 | 6.76 ± 0.15 |
|
| 48 ± 23 | 59 ± 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Perfusion signal (a.u.) | 23 ± 13 | 46 ± 24 |
|
| 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.06 |
Significantly different to .
Significantly different to .
Figure 3Perfusion maps at distal (A) and proximal (B) position overlaid with transversal EPI slices of the calf. Corresponding perfusion time courses of three ROIs (red) for gastrocnemius medialis (C), gastrocnemius lateralis (D), and soleus (E) acquired throughout the experiment for distal (blue) and proximal (orange) slices. Maps are derived from postexercise (60 – 300 s) 1H ASL data, as indicated by the red box in the time courses of a representative subject
Figure 4‐weighted images at distal (A) and proximal (B) position overlaid with transversal EPI slices of the calf. Corresponding ‐weighted time courses of three ROIs (red) of gastrocnemius medialis (C), gastrocnemius lateralis (D), and soleus (E). Images were derived from postexercise (60 – 300 s) 1H ASL data, as indicated by the red box in the time courses of a representative subject
Figure 5Postexercise (averaged 60‐300 s) perfusion signal and maximum ‐weighted signal increase of gastrocnemius medialis (blue), gastrocnemius lateralis (orange), and soleus (green) in slices 3 – 10 averaged over all subjects (A). Individual results of GM from all subjects for slices 3 and 10, respectively (B). Comparison of results between multi‐slice (solid line) and single‐slice (dashed line) protocol from four subjects measured additionally on a separate day. Distal and proximal position of the single‐slice acquisition correspond to slice 4 and 10 in the multi‐slice protocol (C)
Figure 6Postexercise (60‐300 s averaged) perfusion signal (top), maximum ‐weighted signal increase during recovery (bottom) versus end‐exercise PCr depletion (left) and versus end‐exercise pH (right) for distal (circle) and proximal (triangle) position for each subject. Linear regressions were calculated between 31P and corresponding 1H data in GM over all subjects. For 1H results, distal and proximal position represents averaged slices 3‐6 and 7‐10, respectively