Literature DB >> 31845844

Prediction of Core Signaling Pathway by Using Diffusion- and Perfusion-based MRI Radiomics and Next-generation Sequencing in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-type Glioblastoma.

Ji Eun Park1, Ho Sung Kim1, Seo Young Park1, Soo Jung Nam1, Sung-Min Chun1, Youngheun Jo1, Jeong Hoon Kim1.   

Abstract

Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables highly sensitive cancer genomics analysis, but its clinical implications for therapeutic options from imaging-based prediction have been limited. Purpose To predict core signaling pathways in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma by using diffusion and perfusion MRI radiomics and NGS. Materials and Methods The radiogenomics model was developed by using retrospective patients with glioma who underwent NGS and anatomic, diffusion-, and perfusion-weighted imaging between March 2017 and February 2019. For testing model performance in predicting core signaling pathway, patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma from a retrospective analysis from a registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02619890) were evaluated. Radiogenomic feature selection was performed by using t tests, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalization, and random forest. Combining radiogenomic features, age, and location, the performance of predicting receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), tumor protein p53 (P53), and retinoblastoma 1 pathways was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results There were 120 patients (52 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 61 women) who were evaluated. Eighty-five patients (51 years ± 13; 43 men) were in the training set and 35 patients with IDH wild-type glioblastoma (56 years ± 12; 19 women) were in the validation set. Radiogenomics model identified 71 features in the RTK, 17 features in P53, and 35 features in the retinoblastoma pathway. The combined model showed better performance than anatomic imaging-based prediction in the RTK (P = .03) and retinoblastoma (P = .03) and perfusion imaging-based prediction in the P53 pathway (P = .04) in the training set. AUC values of the combined model for the prediction of core signaling pathways were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74, 1) for RTK, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.92) for P53, and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.97) for retinoblastoma in the validation set. Conclusion A diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI radiomics model can help characterize core signaling pathways and potentially guide targeted therapy for isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31845844     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Prediction of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF status in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis using a deep artificial neural network based on radiomics and semantic features.

Authors:  Ruichuan Shi; Weixing Chen; Bowen Yang; Jinglei Qu; Yu Cheng; Zhitu Zhu; Yu Gao; Qian Wang; Yunpeng Liu; Zhi Li; Xiujuan Qu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  A Novel Multi-Omics Analysis Model for Diagnosis and Survival Prediction of Lower-Grade Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Yichang Wang; Jianyang Xiang; Xiaodong Li; Alafate Wahafu; Xiao Yu; Xiaobin Bai; Ge Yan; Chunbao Wang; Ning Wang; Changwang Du; Wanfu Xie; Maode Wang; Jia Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  The progress of multimodal imaging combination and subregion based radiomics research of cancers.

Authors:  Luyuan Zhang; Yumin Wang; Zhouying Peng; Yuxiang Weng; Zebin Fang; Feng Xiao; Chao Zhang; Zuoxu Fan; Kaiyuan Huang; Yu Zhu; Weihong Jiang; Jian Shen; Renya Zhan
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 10.750

Review 4.  Radiomics and Deep Learning from Research to Clinical Workflow: Neuro-Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Philipp Kickingereder; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  A Novel Model Based on CXCL8-Derived Radiomics for Prognosis Prediction in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yanpeng Chu; Jie Li; Zhaoping Zeng; Bin Huang; Jiaojiao Zhao; Qin Liu; Huaping Wu; Jiangping Fu; Yin Zhang; Yefan Zhang; Jianqiang Cai; Fanxin Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Radiomic model for differentiating parotid pleomorphic adenoma from parotid adenolymphoma based on MRI images.

Authors:  Le-le Song; Shun-Jun Chen; Wang Chen; Zhan Shi; Xiao-Dong Wang; Li-Na Song; Dian-Sen Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Stephen J Bagley; Hamed Akbari; Sanjay Saxena; Sina Bagheri; Jun Guo; Sanjeev Chawla; Ali Nabavizadeh; Suyash Mohan; Spyridon Bakas; Christos Davatzikos; MacLean P Nasrallah
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncologic Imaging: A Brief Review for Clinical Use Cases and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2022-04

Review 9.  Imaging-Genomics in Glioblastoma: Combining Molecular and Imaging Signatures.

Authors:  Dongming Liu; Jiu Chen; Xinhua Hu; Kun Yang; Yong Liu; Guanjie Hu; Honglin Ge; Wenbin Zhang; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Radiogenomic Predictors of Recurrence in Glioblastoma-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felix Corr; Dustin Grimm; Benjamin Saß; Mirza Pojskić; Jörg W Bartsch; Barbara Carl; Christopher Nimsky; Miriam H A Bopp
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.