| Literature DB >> 31845482 |
Tom Swinfield1,2, Sabine Both3,4, Terhi Riutta5, Boris Bongalov1, Dafydd Elias6,7, Noreen Majalap-Lee8, Nicholas Ostle7, Martin Svátek9, Jakub Kvasnica9, David Milodowski10,11, Tommaso Jucker12, Robert M Ewers13, Yi Zhang1, David Johnson14, Yit Arn Teh3, David F R P Burslem3, Yadvinder Malhi5, David Coomes1.
Abstract
Logging, pervasive across the lowland tropics, affects millions of hectares of forest, yet its influence on nutrient cycling remains poorly understood. One hypothesis is that logging influences phosphorus (P) cycling, because this scarce nutrient is removed in extracted timber and eroded soil, leading to shifts in ecosystem functioning and community composition. However, testing this is challenging because P varies within landscapes as a function of geology, topography and climate. Superimposed upon these trends are compositional changes in logged forests, with species with more acquisitive traits, characterized by higher foliar P concentrations, more dominant. It is difficult to resolve these patterns using traditional field approaches alone. Here, we use airborne light detection and ranging-guided hyperspectral imagery to map foliar nutrient (i.e. P, nitrogen [N]) concentrations, calibrated using field measured traits, over 400 km2 of northeastern Borneo, including a landscape-level disturbance gradient spanning old-growth to repeatedly logged forests. The maps reveal that canopy foliar P and N concentrations decrease with elevation. These relationships were not identified using traditional field measurements of leaf and soil nutrients. After controlling for topography, canopy foliar nutrient concentrations were lower in logged forest than in old-growth areas, reflecting decreased nutrient availability. However, foliar nutrient concentrations and specific leaf area were greatest in relatively short patches in logged areas, reflecting a shift in composition to pioneer species with acquisitive traits. N:P ratio increased in logged forest, suggesting reduced soil P availability through disturbance. Through the first landscape scale assessment of how functional leaf traits change in response to logging, we find that differences from old-growth forest become more pronounced as logged forests increase in stature over time, suggesting exacerbated phosphorus limitation as forests recover.Entities:
Keywords: imaging spectroscopy; leaf traits; logging; nutrient availability; phosphorus; specific leaf area; topography; tropical forest
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31845482 PMCID: PMC7027875 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Chang Biol ISSN: 1354-1013 Impact factor: 10.863
Figure 1Airborne imaging spectroscopy. (a) A plane flies over the forest canopy simultaneously collecting light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and imaging spectroscopy data. LiDAR uses a scanning laser to measure the three‐dimensional surfaces of the forest canopy and underlying topography. The intensity of sunlight reflected from illuminated leaves is measured in hundreds of continuous bands, each covering 6–12 nm, from 380 to 2,500 nm. Sunlit leaves are collected from the same tree canopies by climbers, which are used to measure leaf traits, including foliar nutrient concentrations. (b) Leaves with different chemical and physical properties have different reflectance spectra. (c) Cross‐validated partial least squares regression is used to produce ‘spectranomic’ predictions of field measured canopy traits from the spectra measured for the same tree crowns from which leaves were collected
Performance of partial least squares regression models to predict foliar traits from hyperspectral measurements, using commonly used leave‐one‐pixel‐out (LOPO) and the more conservative leave‐one‐tree‐out (LOTO) cross‐validation. The number of orthogonal spectral weighting components (n components) used in the final models is reported
| Cross‐validation | Trait |
|
| % RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOPO | Phosphorus concentration (%) | 9 | 41.5 | 37.5 |
| N:P ratio | 8 | 36.6 | 24.2 | |
| Total nitrogen concentration (%) | 7 | 32.0 | 30.1 | |
| Specific leaf area (mm2/mg)a | 3 | 12.8 | 24.3 | |
| LOTO | Phosphorus concentration (%) | 4 | 20.8 | 44.5 |
| N:P ratio | 4 | 12.8 | 28.4 | |
| Total nitrogen concentration (%) | 2 | 7.5 | 35.1 | |
| Specific leaf area (mm2/mg) | 0 | — | — |
R 2 of prediction values expresses the percentage of the total trait variation explained by the prediction. Percentage RMSE is the RMSE as a percentage of the mean trait value.
Abbreviation: RMSE, root mean squared error.
PLSR models fitted to log transformed trait variables.
Figure 2Variation in light detection and ranging measured (a) elevation and (b) top canopy height, and spectranomic estimates of (c) N:P ratio across the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems landscape at 100 × 100 m resolution. Non‐tree vegetation (<4 m in height) for which predictions were not made are shown as grey areas. Panels (d)–(f) show enlarged sections (black squares on the main panels), highlighting the role of elevation in shaping P limitation
Figure 3Comparison of spectranomic estimates of foliar traits in (a–d) short (10 m top canopy height) and (e–h) tall (30 m top canopy height) patches in logged (red) and old‐growth (black) forest landscapes. Relationships between elevation and (a, e) N concentration (per unit leaf mass); (b, f) P concentrations (per unit leaf mass); (c, g) N:P ratio; and (d, h) specific leaf area (SLA) are shown. Fitted lines show mean estimates from bootstrapped simultaneous autoregressive linear models and ribbons show the 95% confidence intervals for the relationships as estimated from 1,000 model iterations. The N:P range where N and P are co‐limiting (14–16) is shown with dashed grey lines
Model parameter estimates and confidence intervals for bootstrapped simultaneous autoregressive linear modelling of the relationships between the spectranomic estimates of canopy foliar traits and disturbance history (old‐growth vs. logged), top canopy height and elevation
| N (%) | P (%) | N:P | SLA (mm2/mg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | Mean | 95% CI | |
| Reference |
| (2.29, 2.39) |
| (0.174, 0.184) |
| (14.7, 15.5) |
| (10.7, 10.9) |
| Logged |
| (−0.68, −0.81) |
| (−0.073, −0.052) |
| (1.05, 3.23) |
| (−1.22, −0.49) |
| Elevation |
| (−0.16, −0.05 |
| (−0.022, −0.010) |
| (0.45, 1.39) | −0.14 | (−0.28, 0.01) |
| TCH | −0.03 | (−0.06, 0.00) | 0.000 | (−0.003, 0.003) | −1.80 | (−0.40, 0.03) |
| (0.03, 0.20) |
| Logged × elevation |
| (0.02, 0.16) |
| (0.001, 0.017) | 0.33 | (−0.40, 1.14) | −0.00 | (−0.24, 0.24) |
| Logged × TCH |
| (−0.11, −0.01) |
| (−0.015, −0.003) | 0.36 | (−0.25, 0.95) |
| (−0.52, −0.13) |
| Elevation × TCH | 0.02 | (−0.00, 0.05) | 0.001 | (−0.000, 0.005) | 0.05 | (−0.20, 0.30) | −0.02 | (−0.09, 0.05) |
| Logged × elevation × TCH | −0.01 | (−0.05, 0.02) | 0.000 | (−0.004, 0.004) | −0.06 | (−0.45, 0.34) | 0.11 | (−0.02, 0.24) |
Parameters are reported relative to the reference level of 30 m tall, old‐growth forest at 200 m a.s.l. Coefficient estimates for top canopy height and elevation are standardized and correspond to changes of one standard deviation in the predictor; for top canopy height SD = 7.3 m; for elevation SD = 155 m. Confidence intervals and statistically significant coefficients, where estimates at the 95% confidence level did not overlap zero, are shown in bold.
Abbreviation: SLA, specific leaf area.