| Literature DB >> 31845066 |
Cristina Plamadeala1, Saransh R Gosain2, Florian Hischen3, Boris Buchroithner4, Sujitha Puthukodan2, Jaroslaw Jacak4, Andrea Bocchino5, Derek Whelan5, Conor O'Mahony5, Werner Baumgartner3, Johannes Heitz2.
Abstract
Biomimetics is the interdisciplinary scientific field focused on the study and imitation of biological systems, with the aim of solving complex technological problems. In this paper, we present a new bio-inspired design for microneedles (MNs) and MN arrays, intended for rapidly coating the MNs with drug/vaccine. The biomimetic approach consists in ornamenting the lateral sides of pyramidal MNs with structures inspired by the external scent efferent systems of some European true bugs, which facilitate a directional liquid transport. To realize these MNs, two-photon polymerization (TPP) technique was used. Liquid coating capabilities of structured and non-structured MNs were compared. Moreover, both in-vivo and ex-vivo skin tests were performed to prove that MNs pierce the skin. We show that the arrays of MNs can be accurately replicated using a micro-moulding technique. We believe this design will be beneficial for the process of drug/vaccine loading onto the needles' surfaces, by making it more efficient and by reducing the drug/vaccine wastage during MN coating process.Entities:
Keywords: Biomimetics; Directed fluid transport; Microfluidics; Microneedles; Two-photon polymerization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31845066 PMCID: PMC6915113 DOI: 10.1007/s10544-019-0456-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Microdevices ISSN: 1387-2176 Impact factor: 2.838
Fig. 1Computer-aided designs of (a) a single microstructure (top and side view); (b) microstructures and the distances between them in different directions; (c) the whole test sample - T channel and two MNs – structured (S) and non-structured (N). Optical microscope images of (d) an individual microstructure; (e) several microstructures, and (f) the whole test sample
Fig. 2Computer-aided design of (a) the structured MN, and (b) the non-structured MN. The corresponding SEM images of (c) the structured MN, and (d) the non-structured MN
Fig. 3a Microscope image of the sample before the wetting test. b–h Liquid front movement in the guiding channel, captured every 30 s following liquid deposition at the bottom of the guiding channel (b) until complete evaporation of the liquid (H)
Fig. 4a Optical microscope image of the T-shaped channel and the two microneedles after the wetting test. b Fluorescent microscope image taken in the red channel after the wetting test performed with a fluorophore-soap-water solution. c Intensity profile along the yellow line in Fig. 4b (before and after the wetting test)
Fig. 5Scanning electron micrographs of the 3 × 3 MNs array of (a) the TPP original, and (d) its corresponding epoxy replica. SEM micrograph of a TPP structured MN from the 3 × 3 array: (b) top view, and (c) side view. SEM micrograph of an epoxy replicated structured MN: (e) top view, and (f) side view
Mean values and standard deviations of the bug-inspired microstructures lengths, base and tip widths. The parameters were measured on the 36 microstructures, visible on the lateral faces of the original MN (Fig. 5c) and its corresponding replicated MN (Fig. 5f)
| Length (μm) | Base width (μm) | Tip width (μm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | Replica | Original | Replica | Original | Replica | |
| Mean value | 39.66 | 39.7 | 9.72 | 9.69 | 2.15 | 2.24 |
| Std. deviation | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
Fig. 6Skin penetration tests. a Methylene blue stained marks after the skin test. b Optical coherence tomography of one MN (SC – stratum corneum, MN – microneedle, GS – glass substrate, E – epidermis)