| Literature DB >> 31844780 |
Nina Dewi Oktaviyanti1,2, Abdul Mun'im1,3.
Abstract
The high demand for cosmetics has had a great impact on the development of innovative products in the cosmetic industry. The availability of raw materials has become a common problem in the cosmetic industry. Materials from nature can act as alternative sources, such as Ixora javanica. Several studies have shown the potential of I. javanica as an antioxidant and skin lightening agent. The objectives of the present study were to develop and optimize a green ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvent extraction of I. javanica. Eleven deep eutectic solvents were evaluated based on extraction efficiency parameters; that is, flavonoid and anthocyanin yields; the antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibitory activities of the extracts. The combination of choline chloride and propylene glycol (1:1) was shown to be the optimal deep eutectic solvent for I. javanica extraction. The extraction parameters of temperature, extraction time, and solid-to-liquid ratio were also optimized using response surface methodology. The total flavonoid compound obtained was 33 mg quercetin equivalent/g dried sample under the optimum extraction condition (extraction time of 5 min, temperature of 57 °C, solid-to-liquid ratio of 0.02 g/mL). In sum, this work demonstrates the potential of natural deep eutectic solvent as an organic solvent replacement to obtain high quality Ixora javanica extract, which is a potential new source of skin-lightening cosmetic materials.Entities:
Keywords: Deep eutectic solvent; Flavonoid; Ixora javanica; Natural product chemistry; Response surface methodology; Skin lightening
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844780 PMCID: PMC6895584 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
List of DESs and their abbreviation used in this study.
| Abbreviation | Combination of HBA and HBD | Molar ratio |
|---|---|---|
| ChPg | Choline chloride: propylene glycol | 1:1 |
| ChGl | Choline chloride: glycerol | 1:2 |
| ChEg | Choline chloride: ethylene glycol | 1:2 |
| ChPeg | Choline chloride: polyethylene glycol | 1:2 |
| ChSb | Choline chloride: sorbitol | 1:1 |
| ChPd | Choline chloride: 1,3-propanediol | 1:3 |
| ChOa | Choline chloride: oxalic acid | 1:1 |
| ChLa | Choline chloride: lactic acid | 1:2 |
| ChGa | Choline chloride: glycolic acid | 1:1 |
| ChMa | Choline chloride: malic acid | 1:1 |
| ChCa | Choline chloride: citric acid | 1:1 |
Composition of solution in tyrosinase inhibitor assay.
| Solution | Composition of solution (μl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | b | c | d | |
| Phosphate buffer | 120 | 160 | 80 | 120 |
| Substrate (L-tyrosine) | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Sample | - | - | 40 | 40 |
| Mushroom tyrosinase | 40 | - | 40 | - |
The coded, range, and real levels of each factor for the experimental design.
| Factor | Unit | Code | Range and level (xi) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Extraction time | min | x1 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
| Temperature | °C | x2 | 30 | 40 | 57 |
| Solid-to-liquid ratio | g/mL | x3 | 1:20 | 1:30 | 1:50 |
Figure 1Total flavonoid (a) and anthocyanin (b) yields from I. javanica with different DES types. * means p < 0.05 compared with ethanol.
Figure 2In vitro antioxidant activities (a) and tyrosinase inhibition activities (b) of I. javanica flower extracts obtained with various DESs. * means p < 0.05 compared with ethanol.
The experimental results of each variable combination.
| RUN | Independent variable | Response | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Total flavonoid (mg QE/g dried sample) | |
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 33.9 |
| 2 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 19.7 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 |
| 4 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 17.8 |
| 5 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 25.9 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 15.7 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16.2 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 8.1 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 15.1 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.2 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 16.9 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.7 |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24.5 |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.1 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 7.6 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.5 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.7 |
| 19 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 4.0 |
| 20 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 28.4 |
Analysis of variance for total flavonoid yields.
| Source | Degrees of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean square | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 9 | 1363.19 | 151.465 | 299.53 | 0.000 |
| Linear | 3 | 787.44 | 262.479 | 519.07 | 0.000 |
| x1 | 1 | 375.77 | 375.769 | 743.11 | 0.000 |
| x2 | 1 | 183.18 | 183.184 | 362.26 | 0.000 |
| x3 | 1 | 228.48 | 228.484 | 451.84 | 0.000 |
| Square | 3 | 565.50 | 188.502 | 372.78 | 0.000 |
| x1*x1 | 1 | 50.20 | 50.205 | 99.28 | 0.000 |
| x2*x2 | 1 | 44.50 | 44.501 | 88.00 | 0.000 |
| x3*x3 | 1 | 46.74 | 46.741 | 92.43 | 0.000 |
| Interaction | 3 | 10.24 | 3.415 | 6.75 | 0.009 |
| x1*x2 | 1 | 7.03 | 7.031 | 13.90 | 0.004 |
| x1*x3 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.211 | 0.42 | 0.533 |
| x2*x3 | 1 | 3.00 | 3.001 | 5.94 | 0.035 |
| Lack-of-fit | 5 | 3.69 | 0.738 | 2.70 | 0.150 |
| Residual Error | 10 | 5.06 | 0.506 | ||
| Pure Error | 5 | 1.37 | 0.274 |
Figure 3Interaction between extraction conditions and yield. 3D Surface graphs of (a) yield versus solid-to-liquid ratio (x3) and extraction time (x1); (b) yield versus temperature (x2) and extraction time (x1); (c) yield versus solid-to-liquid ratio (x3) and temperature (x2).
Figure 4Contour surface graphs of yields for temperature and extraction time (x2*x1); solid-to-liquid ratio and extraction time (x3*x1); and solid-to-liquid ratio and temperature (x3*x2).