| Literature DB >> 31844353 |
Augustina Elochukwu Ijezie1, Ofonime Effiong Johnson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a public health problem that disproportionately affects women in less-developed countries despite the availability of effective screening tools. The objective of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of cervical cancer and uptake of the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test among teachers in public secondary schools in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; knowledge; teacher; uptake of the Pap smear test
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844353 PMCID: PMC6900900 DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_120_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Niger Med J ISSN: 0300-1652
Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (n=370)
| Variables | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| Age group (years) | |
| 20-29 | 68 (18.4) |
| 30-39 | 126 (34.1) |
| 40-49 | 140 (37.8) |
| 50 and above | 36 (9.7) |
| Mean±SD | 37.9±7.9 |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 87 (23.5) |
| Married/cohabiting | 252 (68.1) |
| Divorced/separated | 15 (4.1) |
| Widowed | 16 (4.3) |
| Level of education | |
| NCE/OND | 28 (7.6) |
| B Sc/HND | 300 (81.0) |
| Master and above | 42 (11.4) |
SD – Standard deviation
Awareness of cervical cancer and sources of information among respondents (n=370)
| Variables | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| Awareness of cervical cancer | |
| Yes | 290 (78.4) |
| No | 80 (21.6) |
| Sources of information# | |
| Media | 214 (57.8) |
| Clinic | 37 (10.0) |
| Friend | 29 (7.8) |
| Family | 16 (4.3) |
| Others | 16 (4.3) |
#Multiple response
Knowledge of risk factors for cervical cancer among respondents who were aware of cervical cancer (n=290)
| Variables | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| HPV infection | |
| Yes | 118 (40.8) |
| No | 19 (6.6) |
| Don’t know | 152 (52.6) |
| Prolonged use of oral contraceptive pill | |
| Yes | 119 (41.0) |
| No | 24 (8.3) |
| Don’t know | 147 (50.7) |
| Early marriage before 18 years of age | |
| Yes | 96 (33.1) |
| No | 37 (12.8) |
| Don’t know | 157 (54.1) |
| Tobacco use | |
| Yes | 70 (24.1) |
| No | 48 (16.6) |
| Don’t know | 172 (59.3) |
| Sex with multiple partners | |
| Yes | 100 (34.5) |
| No | 25 (8.6) |
| Don’t know | 165 (56.9) |
| Heredity | |
| Yes | 73 (25.1) |
| No | 44 (15.2) |
| Don’t know | 173 (59.7) |
HPV – Human papillomavirus
Overall level of knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors, symptoms, preventability, and prevention methods among respondents (n=290)
| Variables | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| Level of risk factor knowledge (%) | |
| Low (<50) | 206 (71.0) |
| Intermediate (50-74) | 68 (23.5) |
| High (≥75) | 16 (5.5) |
| Knowledge of symptoms | |
| Low (≤3) | 168 (57.9) |
| Intermediate (4-5) | 97 (33.4) |
| High (≥6) | 25 (8.7) |
| Knowledge that cervical cancer is preventable | |
| Yes | 226 (77.9) |
| No | 7 (2.4) |
| Don’t know | 57 (19.7) |
| Knowledge level of cervical cancer prevention methods ( | |
| Low (≤2) | 81 (35.8) |
| Intermediate (3-4) | 80 (35.4) |
| High (≥5) | 65 (28.8) |
Awareness, sources of information, and knowledge of frequency of the Papanicolaou smear test (n=370)
| Variables | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Awareness of the Pap smear test | |
| Yes | 156 (42.2) |
| No | 214 (57.8) |
| Sources of information# | |
| Media | 93 (25.1) |
| Clinic | 47 (12.7) |
| Family | 10 (2.7) |
| Friend | 21 (5.7) |
| Others | 10 (2.7) |
| Knowledge of frequency of the Pap test ( | |
| Yes | 122 (78.2) |
| No | 6 (3.8) |
| I don’t know | 28 (18.0) |
| Uptake of Pap smear test | |
| Yes | 31 (8.4) |
| No | 339 (91.6) |
#Multiple response. Pap – Papanicolaou
Figure 1Reasons for the nonuptake of the Papanicolaou smear test by participants
Association between sociodemographic characteristics and the uptake of the Papanicolaou smear test among respondents who were aware of the test (n=156)
| Variable | Uptake of Pap smear test | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes ( | No ( | Statistic | |
| Age (years) | |||
| 20-29 | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | Fisher’s exact=0.685 |
| 30-39 | 9 (19.9) | 38 (80.9) | |
| 40-49 | 16 (22.5) | 55 (77.5) | |
| ≥50 | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | 2 (8.7) | 21 (91.3) | Fisher’s exact=0.2528 |
| Married/cohabiting | 26 (21.1) | 97 (78.9) | |
| Divorced/separated | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | |
| Widowed | 2 (25.0) | 6 (75.0) | |
| Level of education | |||
| NCE/OND | 1 (12.5) | 7 (87.5) | |
| B Sc/HND | 20 (16.7) | 100 (83.3) | |
| Master and above | 10 (35.7) | 18 (64.3) | |
Pap – Papanicolaou
Association between knowledge about cervical cancer and the uptake of the Papanicolaou smear test among respondents who were aware of the test (n=156)
| Variable | Uptake of Pap smear test | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes ( | No ( | Statistic ( | |
| Knowledge of risk factors | |||
| Low | 10 (16.7) | 50 (83.3) | 2.102, 0.350 |
| Intermediate | 17 (21.8) | 61 (78.2) | |
| High | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | |
| Knowledge of symptoms | |||
| Low | 13 (18.1) | 59 (81.9) | 7.160, 0.028* |
| Intermediate | 16 (38.1) | 26 (61.9) | |
| High | 2 (12.5) | 14 (87.5) | |
| Knowledge of prevention | |||
| Low | 11 (15.7) | 59 (84.3) | 13.599, 0.001* |
| Intermediate | 9 (21.4) | 33 (78.6) | |
| High | 11 (25.0) | 33 (75.0) | |
*P<0.05. Pap – Papanicolaou