| Literature DB >> 31844119 |
Sina Marsilio1,2, Rachel Pilla3, Benjamin Sarawichitr3, Betty Chow4,5, Steve L Hill4,6, Mark R Ackermann7, J Scot Estep8, Jonathan A Lidbury3, Joerg M Steiner3, Jan S Suchodolski3.
Abstract
Feline chronic enteropathy (CE) is a common gastrointestinal disorder in cats and mainly comprises inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and small cell lymphoma (SCL). Both IBD and SCL in cats share features with chronic enteropathies such as IBD and monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma in humans. The aim of this study was to characterize the fecal microbiome of 38 healthy cats and 27 cats with CE (13 cats with IBD and 14 cats with SCL). Alpha diversity indices were significantly decreased in cats with CE (OTU p = 0.003, Shannon Index p = 0.008, Phylogenetic Diversity p = 0.019). ANOSIM showed a significant difference in bacterial communities, albeit with a small effect size (P = 0.023, R = 0.073). Univariate analysis and LEfSE showed a lower abundance of facultative anaerobic taxa of the phyla Firmicutes (families Ruminococcaceae and Turicibacteraceae), Actinobacteria (genus Bifidobacterium) and Bacteroidetes (i.a. Bacteroides plebeius) in cats with CE. The facultative anaerobic taxa Enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcaceae were increased in cats with CE. No significant difference between the microbiome of cats with IBD and those with SCL was found. Cats with CE showed patterns of dysbiosis similar to those in found people with IBD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844119 PMCID: PMC6914782 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55691-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparison of demographic data between healthy cats and cats with feline chronic enteropathy (FCE).
| Healthy | Feline CE | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| number of cats | 38 | 27 | |
| median age in years (range) | 9 (1–15) | 10 (2–16) | 0.052 |
| median body weight in kg (range) | 5.4 (2.5–8.6) | 4.6 (2.9–10.5) | 0.035 |
| median body condition score (range) | 5 (4–9) | 4 (1–9) | <0.0001 |
| sex | 18 FS, 20 MN | 11 FS, 16 MN | 0.596 |
| breeds | 22 DSH, 4 DLH, 2 Maine Coon, 2 Persian, 1 Bombay, 1 Burmese, 1 DMH, 1 Norwegian Forest Cat, 1 Lynx, 1 mixed breed, 1 Sphinx | 17 DSH, 3 DMH, 3 Siamese, 2 DLH, 1 Rag Doll, 1 mixed breed |
Abbreviations: FS female spayed, MN male neutered, DSH domestic shorthair, DLH domestic longhair, DMH domestic medium hair.
Figure 1Alpha diversity indices at a depth of 43.660 sequences. (A) Observed OTUs. (B) Shannon Diversity Index. (C) Faith Phylogenetic Diversity Index. Figures on the left show the comparison between healthy cats and cats with chronic enteropathy (FCE). Figures on the right show the comparison between different the CE subgroups, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and small cell lymphoma (SCL). The top dashed line represents the Kruskal Wallis ANOVA comparison, solid parentheses represent post hoc multiple comparisons using Dunn’s test.
Figure 2(A) Beta diversity. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of unweighted UniFrac distances of 16S rRNA genes. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) revealed significantly different between healthy cats and cats with chronic enteropathy (P = 0.023, R = 0.073), although with a small effect size and no visible clustering. Healthy cats are depicted as blue, cats with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as yellow, and cats with small cell lymphoma (SCL) as red dots. (B–F) Univariate analysis of relative percent abundance of selected taxa. Members of the family Ruminococcaceae, of the genus Bifidobacterium and the species Bacteroides plebeius were found to be lower in cats with chronic enteropathy (CE) compared to healthy cats. Members of the genus Streptococcus and the family Enterobacteriaceae were found to be higher in cats with CE compared to healthy cats.
Taxa found to be significantly different (p value) between healthy cats and cats with chronic enteropathy (FCE) before correction for false discovery (q value). Numbers represent relative percentages.
| Bacterial Group | Healthy | FCE | Healthy vs. FCE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Range | Median | Range | Pvalue | Qvalue | |
| Actinobacteria | 1.2 | 0–36.8 | 0.2 | 0.1–38.9 | 0.0466 | 0.2563 |
| Bacteroidia | 25.3 | 1.2–56.4 | 16.6 | 0.7–55.3 | 0.0458 | 0.2563 |
| Bifidobacteriales | 1.2 | 0–36.8 | 0.2 | 0.1–38.9 | 0.0316 | 0.14885 |
| Bacteroidales | 25.3 | 1.2–56.4 | 16.6 | 0.7–55.3 | 0.0458 | 0.14885 |
| Turicibacterales | 0 | 0–23.7 | 0 | 0–5.8 | 0.0344 | 0.14885 |
| Enterobacteriales | 0.1 | 0–32.6 | 0.4 | 0–39.4 | 0.0098 | 0.1274 |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | 1.2 | 0–36.8 | 0.2 | 0.1–38.9 | 0.0316 | 0.16053333 |
| Prevotellaceae | 1.1 | 0–21.7 | 0.5 | 0–22.5 | 0.0519 | 0.1827 |
| Odoribacteraceae | 0 | 0–2.8 | 0.1 | 0–1.4 | 0.0522 | 0.1827 |
| Paraprevotellaceae | 0 | 0–18.5 | 0 | 0–5.6 | 0.0022 | 0.0616 |
| Streptococcaceae | 0 | 0–4.1 | 0.1 | 0–61.4 | 0.0059 | 0.0826 |
| Turicibacteraceae | 0 | 0–23.7 | 0 | 0–5.8 | 0.0344 | 0.16053333 |
| Ruminococcaceae | 8 | 1.2–18.4 | 5.7 | 0.2–17.3 | 0.0228 | 0.1596 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 0.1 | 0–32.6 | 0.4 | 0–39.4 | 0.0098 | 0.09146667 |
| Bifidobacterium | 1.2 | 0–36.8 | 0.2 | 0.1–38.9 | 0.0316 | 0.2021 |
| Prevotella | 0 | 0–18.5 | 0 | 0–5.6 | 0.0182 | 0.17108 |
| Streptococcus | 0 | 0–4.1 | 0.1 | 0–61.4 | 0.0037 | 0.08695 |
| Turicibacter | 0 | 0–23.7 | 0 | 0–5.8 | 0.0344 | 0.2021 |
| Undetermined genus, Peptostreptococcaceae | 0.3 | 0–16.6 | 0.1 | 0–5.9 | 0.04 | 0.20888889 |
| Undetermined genus, Ruminococcaceae | 0.1 | 0–0.9 | 0 | 0–0.5 | 0.0033 | 0.08695 |
| Oscillospira | 1.1 | 0.1–3.5 | 0.7 | 0–2.2 | 0.0181 | 0.17108 |
| Undetermined genus, Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.1 | 0–0.9 | 0 | 0–0.8 | 0.0241 | 0.18878333 |
| Undetermined genus, Enterobacteriaceae | 0.1 | 0–32.6 | 0.4 | 0–39.4 | 0.0081 | 0.1269 |
| Undetermined species, Bifidobacterium | 1.1 | 0–35.2 | 0.2 | 0–38.6 | 0.0234 | 0.13737 |
| Undetermined species, Bacteroides | 0.1 | 0–2.3 | 0 | 0–0.8 | 0.0041 | 0.058425 |
| Undetermined species, Bacteroides | 10.8 | 0.3–51 | 6.5 | 0.3–47.4 | 0.3514 | 0.5271 |
| Bacteroides plebeius | 1.2 | 0–14.5 | 0.1 | 0–10.9 | 0.0039 | 0.058425 |
| Undetermined species, Prevotella | 0 | 0–18.5 | 0 | 0–5.6 | 0.0182 | 0.129675 |
| Undetermined species, Enterococcaceae | 0.1 | 0–5 | 0 | 0–1.7 | 0.1968 | 0.37791 |
| Undetermined species, Streptococcus | 0 | 0–4.1 | 0.1 | 0–61.4 | 0.0109 | 0.10355 |
| Undetermined species, Turicibacter | 0 | 0–23.7 | 0 | 0–5.8 | 0.0344 | 0.1691 |
| Undetermined species, Clostridium | 0.2 | 0–10.8 | 0.9 | 0.1–20.3 | 0.0022 | 0.058425 |
| Undetermined species, Ruminococcus | 0 | 0–3.2 | 0.6 | 0–2.5 | 0.0356 | 0.1691 |
| Undetermined species, Peptostreptococcaceae | 0.3 | 0–16.6 | 0.1 | 0–5.9 | 0.04 | 0.17538462 |
| Undetermined species, Ruminococcaceae | 0.1 | 0–0.9 | 0 | 0–0.5 | 0.0033 | 0.058425 |
| Undetermined species, Oscillospira | 1.1 | 0.1–3.5 | 0.7 | 0–2.2 | 0.0181 | 0.129675 |
| Undetermined species, Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.1 | 0–0.9 | 0 | 0–0.8 | 0.0241 | 0.13737 |
| Undetermined species, Enterobacteriaceae | 0.1 | 0–32.6 | 0.4 | 0–39.4 | 0.0081 | 0.09234 |
Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE) analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences.
| Level | Selected Taxa | Associated Group | LDA Score | Associated Subgroup | LDA Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidetes | Healthy | 4.797 | None | NA | |
| Actinobacteria | Healthy | 4.562 | Healthy | 4.662 | |
| Bacteroida | Healthy | 4.74 | None | NA | |
| Bifiodobacteriales | Healthy | 4.196 | Healthy | 4.659 | |
| Turicibacterales | Healthy | 4.356 | None | NA | |
| Enterobacteriales | FCE | 4.302 | None | NA | |
| Bacteroidales | Healthy | 4.549 | None | NA | |
| Streptococcaceae | FCE | 4.229 | SCL | 4.425 | |
| Ruminococcaceae | Healthy | 4.204 | None | NA | |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | Healthy | 4.227 | Healthy | 4.394 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae | FCE | 4.256 | None | NA | |
| Paraprevotellaceae | Healthy | 4.009 | Healthy | 4.116 | |
| Turicibacteraceae | Healthy | 4.04 | None | NA | |
| Odoribacteraceae | None | NA | SCL | 4.289 | |
| Prevotellaceae | None | NA | Healthy | 3.851 | |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | Healthy | 3.672 | None | NA | |
| Oscillospira | Healthy | 3.534 | None | NA | |
| Peptostreptococcaceae (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.594 | None | NA | |
| Bifidobacterium | Healthy | 4.293 | Healthy | 4.496 | |
| Turicibacter | Healthy | 3.632 | None | NA | |
| Streptococcus | FCE | 4.119 | SCL | 4.511 | |
| Paraprevotella | Healthy | 3.789 | None | NA | |
| Enterobacteriaceae (unclassified) | FCE | 4.226 | None | NA | |
| Prevotella | Healthy | 4.109 | Healthy | 4.304 | |
| Coriobacteriaceae (unclassified) | None | NA | IBD | 4.187 | |
| Turicibacter (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.578 | None | NA | |
| Streptococcus (unclassified) | FCE | 4.092 | SCL | 4.494 | |
| Oscillospira (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.509 | None | NA | |
| Bacteroides plebeius | Healthy | 4.069 | Healthy | 4.285 | |
| Enterobacteriaceae (unclassified) | FCE | 4.255 | None | NA | |
| Paraprevotella (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.465 | None | NA | |
| Peptostreptococcaceae (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.652 | None | NA | |
| Bifidobacterium (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.972 | None | NA | |
| Erysipelotrichaceae (unclassified) | Healthy | 3.626 | None | NA | |
| Prevotella copri | None | NA | Healthy | 4.258 | |
| Coriobacteriaceae (unclassified) | None | NA | SCL | 4.169 |
LEfSE was calculated for healthy cats vs. cats with chronic enteropathy (FCE) and in a second step for the subgroups of FCE, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and small cell lymphoma (SCL). The Linear Discriminant Analysis Score (LDA) is given as log 10. Only the taxa meeting a significant LDA threshold value of >2 are shown.