Literature DB >> 31843679

Critical appraisal of the techniques of pancreatic anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis.

Chathura B B Ratnayake1, Cameron I Wells1, Sivesh K Kamarajah2, Benjamin Loveday3, Gourab Sen2, Jeremy J French2, Steve White2, Sanjay Pandanaboyana4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared techniques of pancreatic anastomosis following PD to determine the technique with the best outcome profile.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on the Scopus, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane databases to identify RCTs employing the international study group of pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) definition of POPF. The primary outcome was clinically relevant POPF.
RESULTS: Five techniques of pancreatic anastomosis following PD were directly compared in 15 RCTs comprising 2428 patients. Panreatojejunostomy (PJ) end-to-side invagination vs. PJ end-to-side duct-to-mucosa was the most frequent comparison (n = 7). Overall, 971 patients underwent PJ end-to-side duct-to-mucosa, 791 patients PJ end-to-side invagination, 505 patients pancreatogastrostomy (PG) end-to-side invagination, 98 patients PG end-to-side duct-to-mucosa, and 63 patients PJ end-to-side single layer. PG duct-to-mucosa was associated with the lowest rates of clinically relevant POPF, delayed gastric emptying, intra-abdominal abscess, all postoperative morbidity and postoperative mortality, the shortest operative time and postoperative hospital stay and the lowest volume of intra-operative blood loss.
CONCLUSION: Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy was associated with the lowest rates of clinically relevant POPF and had the best outcome profile among all techniques of pancreatico-anastomosis following PD.
Copyright © 2019 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic anastomosis; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticogastrostomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843679     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  4 in total

1.  Modified binding pancreaticogastrostomy vs modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Satyaprakash Ray Choudhury; Raja Kalayarasan; Senthil Gnanasekaran; Biju Pottakkat
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study.

Authors:  Georgi Kalev; Christoph Marquardt; Herbert Matzke; Paul Matovu; Thomas Schiedeck
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2020-12-21

3.  Intraoperative Perfusion Assessment in Enhanced Reality Using Quantitative Optical Imaging: An Experimental Study in a Pancreatic Partial Ischemia Model.

Authors:  Taiga Wakabayashi; Manuel Barberio; Takeshi Urade; Raoul Pop; Emilie Seyller; Margherita Pizzicannella; Pietro Mascagni; Anne-Laure Charles; Yuta Abe; Bernard Geny; Andrea Baiocchini; Yuko Kitagawa; Jacques Marescaux; Eric Felli; Michele Diana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-08

4.  Blumgart anastomosis reduces the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenlu Li; Ailin Wei; Ning Xia; Liangxia Zheng; Dujiang Yang; Jun Ye; Junjie Xiong; Weiming Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.