| Literature DB >> 31842971 |
Xiao-Juan Lv1,2,3, Xiao-Long Cheng4, Ye-Qiang Tu1,2,3, Ding-Ding Yan1,2,3, Qiu Tang5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Dose limit; Ovarian function; Ovarian transposition; Pelvic radiotherapy; Uterine cervical neoplasms
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842971 PMCID: PMC6916465 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1437-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Fig. 1Relationship between ovary position and PTV. a Lower boundary of the ovary is above the upper boundary of the PTV. b Lower boundary of the ovary is below the upper boundary of the PTV
Characteristics of patients with the ovary above or below PTV
| Characteristics | Above PTV ( | Below PTV ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovarian volume, cm3 | 12.84 ± 7.92 | 13.63 ± 9.13 | 0.650* |
| Ovarian cyst, case (rate) | 6 (18.8%) | 29 (20.1%) | 0.859# |
| Side of transposed ovaries | 0.117# | ||
| Right side | 27 (84.4%) | 102 (70.8%) | |
| Left side | 5 (15.6%) | 42 (29.2%) | |
| Radiotherapy methods | 0.001# | ||
| 3D-CRT | 21 (65.6%) | 47 (32.6%) | |
| IMRT | 11 (34.4%) | 97 (67.4%) | |
| Distance from iliac crest plane, cm | 3.87 ± 1.92 | 0.49 ± 2.20 | 0.000* |
| Dmax≤400 cGy, case (rate) | 32 (100%) | 57 (39.6%) | 0.000# |
*Student’s t-test
# χ2 test
Fig. 2ROC curve of the distance between the ovary and iliac crest plane to predict ovary above PTV. The AUC was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.853–0.946, p = 0.000), and the optimal cut-off point value was 1.12 cm
Characteristics of patients with the ovarian Dmax greater or less than 400 cGy
| Characteristics | Dmax | Dmax > 400 cGy ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height, cm | 158.58 ± 5.72 | 159.29 ± 4.47 | 0.407* |
| Weight, kg | 56.15 ± 10.69 | 54.74 ± 9.82 | 0.638* |
| BMI | 22.06 ± 3.85 | 21.57 ± 3.69 | 0.445* |
| Ovarian volume, cm3 | 12.45 ± 8.12 | 14.40 ± 9.69 | 0.209* |
| Ovarian cyst, case (rate) | 11 (19.3%) | 18 (20.7%) | 0.839# |
| Side of transposed ovaries | 0.083# | ||
| Right side | 45 (78.9%) | 57 (65.5%) | |
| Left side | 12 (21.1%) | 30 (34.5%) | |
| Radiotherapy methods | 0.190# | ||
| 3D-CRT | 15 (26.3%) | 32 (36.8%) | |
| IMRT | 42 (73.7%) | 55 (63.2%) | |
| Distance from iliac crest plane, cm | 1.08 ± 2.28 | 0.10 ± 2.06 | 0.008* |
| Transverse distance from PTV, cm | 4.03 ± 1.15 | 2.88 ± 1.01 | 0.000* |
| Longitudinal distance from PTV, cm | −3.22 ± 2.41 | −3.89 ± 2.12 | .083* |
*Student’s t-test
# χ2 test
Independent risk factors to predict the satisfactory ovarian dose of radiotherapy
| Characteristics | OR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Distance from iliac crest plane | 0.947 | 0.760–1.181 | 0.631 |
| Transverse distance from PTV | 0.377 | 0.248–0.571 | 0.000& |
| Longitudinal distance from PTV | 1.002 | 0.807–1.243 | 0.985 |
&P < 0.05
Fig. 3ROC curve of the distance between the ovary and PTV to predict the ovarian Dmax ≤400 cGy. The AUC was 0.779 (95% CI: 0.703–0.856, p = 0.000), and the optimal cut-off point value was 3.265 cm
Fig. 4ROC curve of the distance between the ovary and PTV to predict the ovarian Dmax ≤500 cGy. The AUC was 0.755 (95% CI: 0.638–0.872, p = 0.000), and the optimal cut-off point value was 2.391 cm
Fig. 5Sex hormone levels at different times points pre- and post-radiotherapy. The E2 levels were significantly decreased 3 months post-radiotherapy, but rebounded one-year post-radiotherapy. The FSH and LH levels were opposite trends
Sex hormone levels and ovarian function in patients pre- and post-radiotherapy
| Characteristics | Pre-radiotherapy | Three months post-radiotherapy | One-year post-radiotherapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| E2, pg/mL | 138.68 ± 90.91 | 68.75 ± 98.77* | 106.85 ± 126.46& |
| FSH, mIU/mL | 7.13 ± 6.40 | 55.25 ± 43.35* | 33.14 ± 40.58& |
| LH, mIU/mL | 9.35 ± 9.67 | 32.09 ± 24.49* | 20.02 ± 23.62& |
| Normal ovarian function, case (rate) | 77(100%) | 34 (44.3%) | 56(72.7%) # |
*Student’s t-test, Comparison of sex hormone levels with pre-radiotherapy. P < 0.01
&Student’s t-test, Comparison of sex hormone levels with 3 months post-radiotherapy. P < 0.05
#χ2 test, Comparison of cases of normal ovarian function with 3 months post-radiotherapy. P < 0.01