| Literature DB >> 31842955 |
Anamaria Ioana Paştiu1,2, Anamaria Cozma-Petruț3, Aurélien Mercier4,5, Anamaria Balea1, Lokman Galal4,5, Viorica Mircean1, Dana Liana Pusta2, Liviu Bogdan6, Adriana Györke1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Foodborne toxoplasmosis in humans can be due to the exposure to tissue cysts of Toxoplasma gondii through the consumption of meat, including pork, of infected animals. Traditional Romanian food habits include pork as the preferred meat, while backyard pig rearing remains a common practice in many rural areas of Romania. The aims of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of T. gondii infection in naturally infected backyard pigs slaughtered for familial consumption and to genetically characterize the T. gondii strains obtained.Entities:
Keywords: Genotyping; Pigs; Prevalence; Romania; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842955 PMCID: PMC6915976 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3842-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Regional distribution over Romania of households with backyard pigs included in the study. Yellow circles, sites where blood and heart samples were collected from backyard pigs; red squares, sites where T. gondii isolates were obtained. The map was created with ArcGis software. Abbreviations: AB, Alba county; AR, Arad county; BH, Bihor county; BN, Bistrița-Năsăud county; BV, Brașov county; CJ, Cluj county; HR, Harghita county; MS, Mureș county; SB, Sibiu county; SJ, Sălaj county; SM, Satu Mare county
Prevalence levels of T. gondii infection in backyard pigs from Romania by region, age and sex using IFAT and PCR
| IFAT | PCR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. positive | Prevalence | No. positive | Prevalence (%) | ||||
| Region | |||||||
| Central | 44 | 25 | 56.8 (41.0–71.7)* | 0.04 | 7 | 15.9 (6.6–30.1) | 0.04 |
| North-west | 40 | 18 | 45.0 (29.3–61.5) | 14 | 35.0 (20.6–51.7)* | ||
| West | 10 | 1 | 10.0 (0.25–44.5) | 4 | 40 (12.2–73.7) | ||
| Age group | |||||||
| < 1 year-old | 37 | 15 | 40.5 (24.8–57.9) | 0.33 | 10 | 27.0 (13.8–44.1) | 0.79 |
| ≥ 1 year-old | 57 | 29 | 50.9 (37.3–64.4) | 14 | 24.6 (14.1–37.8) | ||
| Sex | |||||||
| Females | 49 | 20 | 40.8 (27.0–55.8) | 0.22 | 11 | 22.4 (11.8–36.6) | 0.47 |
| Males | 24 | 45 | 53.3 (37.9–68.3) | 13 | 28.9 (16.4–44.3) | ||
| Total | 94 | 44 | 46.8 (36.4–57.4) | 24 | 25.5 (17.1– 35.6) | ||
*P < 0.05
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IFAT, immunofluorescence antibody test; n, number of samples; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
Measures of agreement between IFAT and PCR results
| IFAT/PCR heart | |
|---|---|
| Kappa ( | 0.12 (− 0.06–0.30) |
| Overall agreement (%) | 57.5 |
| Positive percent agreement | 41.2 |
| Negative percent agreement | 66.7 |
| McNemar | 9.03 |
Abbreviations: IFAT, immunofluorescence antibody test; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
Genotyping results of Toxoplasma gondii DNA from Romanian strains (n = 13) isolated from pigs and a set of Romanian and European strains isolated from animals and humans and analyzed in previous studies with 15 microsatellite markers in a single multiplex PCR assay
| Isolate | Origin | Host species | Lineage | Microsatellite markers | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUB2 | W35 | TgM-A | B18 | B17 | M33 | IV.1 | XI.1 | M48 | M102 | N60 | N82 | AA | N61 | N83 | Ref | ||||
| PT-B1 | Portugal | Cow | Type I | 291 | 248 | 209 | 160 | 342 | 169 | 274 | 358 | 209 | 166 | 147 | 119 | 273 | 87 | 306 | [ |
| PRU | France | Human | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 209 | 176 | 142 | 117 | 265 | 123 | 310 | [ |
| NED | France | Human | Type III | 289 | 242 | 205 | 160 | 336 | 165 | 278 | 356 | 209 | 190 | 147 | 111 | 267 | 91 | 312 | [ |
| ROU-H-001 | Romania | Human | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 231 | 176 | 138 | 109 | 273 | 93 | 312 | [ |
| TgRO-1GK | Romania | Goat | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 235 | 176 | 140 | 115 | 275 | 115 | 310 | [ |
| TgRO-2GK | Romania | Goat | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 235 | 176 | 140 | 115 | 275 | 115 | 310 | [ |
| RS-Eq39 | Serbia | Horse | Type III | 289 | 242 | 205 | 160 | 336 | 165 | 278 | 356 | 211 | 190 | 147 | 111 | 265 | 87 | 312 | [ |
| RS-Eq40 | Serbia | Horse | Type III | 289 | 242 | 205 | 160 | 336 | 165 | 278 | 356 | 213 | 190 | 149 | 111 | 267 | 89 | 312 | [ |
| TgRO-1PAB | Romania | Pig | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 225 | 176 | 142 | 113 | 259 | 95 | 312 | This study |
| TgRO-1PBH | Romania | Pig | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 217 | 176 | 142 | 125 | 277 | 93 | 312 | This study |
| TgRO-2PBH | Romania | Pig | Type II | 289 | 242 | 207 | 158 | 336 | 169 | 274 | 356 | 217 | 176 | 142 | 125 | 277 | 93 | 312 | This study |
Abbreviation: Ref, reference
Fig. 2Neighbour-joining clustering of T. gondii isolates based on 15 microsatellite markers. Green circles next to the identifiers of genotypes indicate strains from Romania (n = 16), red triangles indicate strains from the neighbouring Serbia (n = 12) [47] and black squares indicate reference strains representing the three most common lineages in Europe: types I, II and III. Support values using 1000 bootstrap samples are shown at the base of each clade. For details refer to Table 3