| Literature DB >> 31842930 |
Lanlan Bai1,2, Shin-Nosuke Takeshima3,4, Masaaki Sato1, William C Davis5, Satoshi Wada2, Junko Kohara6, Yoko Aida7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bovine leukemia virus (BLV), which is closely related to human T-cell leukemia virus, is the etiological agent of enzootic bovine leukosis, a disease characterized by a highly prolonged course involving persistent lymphocytosis and B-cell lymphoma. The bovine major histocompatibility complex class II region plays a key role in the subclinical progression of BLV infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the roles of CD4+ T-cell epitopes in disease progression in cattle.Entities:
Keywords: Bovine leukemia virus; Bovine leukocyte antigen class II; CD4+ T-cell epitope mapping; Disease susceptibility; Proviral load
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842930 PMCID: PMC6916044 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-019-1259-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Blood samples used for epitope mapping
| Animal no. | Breed | Ageb (months) | PBLsc | Proviral load | Anti-BLV antibody (ELISA)e | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:B | A:B | (cells/μl) | (CoCoMo-qPCR)d | ||||
| Susceptible cattle | |||||||
| S4 | JBf | 9 | 10,400 | 76,029 | + | ||
| S2 | JB | 10 | 11,600 | 96,232 | + | ||
| S6 | JB | 9 | 10,200 | 100,377 | + | ||
| Resistant cattle | |||||||
| R1 | JB | 9 | 4210 | 263 | + | ||
| Normal cattle | |||||||
| N1 | JB | 9 | 10,200 | 50,877 | + | ||
aBoth alleles, A and B, for each animal are shown
bAge at the time of blood sample collection
cPeripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) count per 1 μl of blood (measured at a single time point)
dProviral load (expressed as the number of copies of provirus per 105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) was evaluated using the CoCoMo-qPCR-2 assay
eEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed using the BLV ELISA kit. +, BLV-positive
fJB, Japanese black
Fig. 1CD4+ T-cell proliferative responses to 23 peptide pools. PBMCs were obtained from five BLV-infected cattle (S2, S4, S6, R1, and N1). CD4+ T-cells were then isolated and used as effector cells. PBMCs were pre-treated with mitomycin C (4 × 105/50 μl; 50 μg/ml) for 1 h at 37 °C and then co-incubated with CD4+ T-cells (1 × 105/50 μl) and different peptide pools (each pool contained five different peptides, each at 20 μM) for 113 h at 37 °C. Cell Counting Kit-8 was used to measure CD4+ T-cell proliferation. The absorbance of the test wells was compared with that of control wells that did not contain peptides. The Stimulation Index (SI) was calculated as follows: . The bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate wells. Asterisk and shade box bar mean the pool showed significantly higher value than DMSO (negative control) well (p < 0.01)
Fig. 2CD4+ T-cell proliferative responses to individual peptides within positive peptide pools. CD4+ T-cells (effector cells; 1 × 105 cells/50 μl) from four BLV-infected cattle (S2, S4, R1, and N1) were co-incubated with mitomycin C-treated PBMCs (APCs; 4 × 105 cells/50 μl) and incubated with either 80% DMSO (negative control) or peptide from pools 9, 11 and 14 (for S2), pool 21 (for S4), pools 20 and 21 (for R1), and pools 9 and 21 (for N1), all at a final concentration of 20 μM. The cells were incubated with peptide for 113 h at 37 °C and CD4+ T-cell proliferation was examined using Cell Counting Kit-8. The absorbance of the test wells was compared with that of control wells incubated without peptide and the Stimulation Index (SI) was calculated as follows: . The bars represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate wells. Asterisk and shade box bar mean the peptide showed significantly higher value than DMSO (negative control) well (p < 0.01)
Fig. 3Schematic representation of CD4+ T-cell epitopes based on the deduced amino acid sequences of the BLV Env (gp51 and gp30) (a), and Tax (b) proteins. The epitope names, blue bold underline and pink denote the CD4+ T-cell epitopes identified in this study. The signal peptide is shown double under line. The putative gp51 and gp30 proteins are indicated with arrows. The three conformational epitopes (G, H and F) are shown under line. Five linear epitopes (A, B, C, D and E) are shown single under line and italic. Neutralization domains are shown in double under line and italic