Literature DB >> 3184289

Gastrocystoplasty: an alternative solution to the problem of urological reconstruction in the severely compromised patient.

M C Adams1, M E Mitchell, R C Rink.   

Abstract

An isolated segment of stomach was used for bladder augmentation in 10 patients or construction of a continent urinary reservoir in 3. Diagnosis in these 13 patients included cloacal exstrophy (5), myelodysplasia (4), posterior urethral valves (2), radiation cystitis (1) and neurogenic bladder secondary to a rectal pull-through procedure (1). Indications for the use of stomach in bladder reconstruction were decreased renal function and acidosis (6 patients), insufficient large and small bowel (6) and decreased mucus production (1). Postoperative followup averaged 13 months (range 6 to 23 months). All patients have stable upper tracts radiographically and stable or improved renal function. Of 13 patients 10 require intermittent clean catheterization to empty and 11 are completely continent. Nine patients have remained free of infection, while 4 had asymptomatic bacteriuria. Mucus production is reduced relative to other intestinal segments and 10 patients require no bladder irrigations. Postoperative urodynamic evaluation is similar to that of ileocystoplasty or colocystoplasty. Use of stomach has protected these patients from the development of new or worsened hyperchloremic acidosis. Serum chloride values have decreased and serum total carbon dioxide values have increased after bladder reconstruction, particularly in patients with impaired renal function. Stomach should be considered when lower urinary tract reconstruction is necessary in such compromised patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3184289     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  25 in total

1.  Reverse serosal demucosalized gastrocystoplasty.

Authors:  N P Sheth; Malka Chainani
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Surgery: outcomes of gastric-segment bladder reconstruction.

Authors:  Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Combining gastric and ileal segments, does it overcome segment-related complications? An experimental study on rats.

Authors:  Berk Burgu; Mehmet İlker Gökce; Özgü Aydoğdu; Evren Süer; Duygu Kankaya; Tarkan Soygür
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 4.  Indications for Augmentation Cystoplasty in the Era of OnabotulinumtoxinA.

Authors:  Evan Shreck; Kevin Gioia; Alvaro Lucioni
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  [Urinary diversion in childhood: special attention to the long-term consequences and complications].

Authors:  R Stein; A Schröder; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Enzymatic treatment of ileal segments used for urinary tract reconstruction.

Authors:  L N Türkeri; F Simşek; A Sav; Y N Ilker; A Akdaş
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Female bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  S J Crankson; S Ahmed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

9.  Reconstructive bladder surgery in genitourinary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Narmada Prasad Gupta; Anup Kumar; Sachit Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-07

10.  Bladder augmentation: Review of the literature and recent advances.

Authors:  Serhat Gurocak; Jody Nuininga; Iyimser Ure; Robert P E De Gier; Mustafa Ozgur Tan; Wouter Feitz
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.