| Literature DB >> 31842729 |
Chandler D Gatenbee1, Ryan O Schenck1,2, Rafael R Bravo1, Alexander R A Anderson3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High throughput sequence data has provided in depth means of molecular characterization of populations. When recorded at numerous time steps, such data can reveal the evolutionary dynamics of the population under study by tracking the changes in genotype frequencies over time. This necessitates a simple and flexible means of visualizing an increasingly complex set of data.Entities:
Keywords: Evolution; Tumor; Visualization software
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842729 PMCID: PMC6916070 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3173-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Comparison of the features within the currently available packages for plotting evolutionary dynamics
| ggmuller | fishplot | EvoFreq | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency data | |||
| Size data | |||
| Long format | |||
| Wide format | |||
| Smoothing | |||
| Uses ggplot | |||
| Animations | |||
| Create graphs | |||
| Integration with subclonal | |||
| reconstruction software |
EvoFreq is capable of visualizing the evolutionary dynamics from ClonEvol, PhyloWGS, and CALDER
Fig. 1EvoFreq is a comprehensive and flexible R package for the visualization of longitudinal data. a and b show an EvoFreq plot for one of the provided datasets with b and without a the function to add labels. For more complicated data EvoFreq provides a powerful means to quickly filter data (c and d thresholded at 0.2 frequency), color by an attribute (driver strength), and visualize dynamics as a frequencies rather than population size. Using a dendogram styled to ensure that origin time is easily conveyed (termed here as an EvoGram), a more quantitative view is provided e
Fig. 2EvoFreq can be easily used to visualize outputs from CloneEvol, PhyloWGS, and CALDER. Data parsing functions are included within EvoFreq to rapidly visualize subclonal reconstructions. Each column above illustrates a method of subclonal reconstruction for two separate human breast cancer xenograftments from Eirew et al. [6] for PhyloWGS (left) and CALDER (right). Originating tumors (T) and their subsequent xenograft passages (X1, X2, etc.) are shown for SA501 (top) and SA536 (bottom)