H X Dang1,2, B S White1,2, S M Foltz1, C A Miller1, J Luo3,4, R C Fields3,4, C A Maher1,2,4,5. 1. McDonnell Genome Institute. 2. Department of Internal Medicine. 3. Department of Surgery. 4. Siteman Cancer Center. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of clonal evolution is critical for understanding tumor progression and implementing personalized therapies. This is often done by clustering somatic variants based on their cellular prevalence estimated via bulk tumor sequencing of multiple samples. The clusters, consisting of the clonal marker variants, are then ordered based on their estimated cellular prevalence to reconstruct clonal evolution trees, a process referred to as 'clonal ordering'. However, cellular prevalence estimate is confounded by statistical variability and errors in sequencing/data analysis, and therefore inhibits accurate reconstruction of the clonal evolution. This problem is further complicated by intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, the field lacks a comprehensive visualization tool to facilitate the interpretation of complex clonal relationships. To address these challenges we developed ClonEvol, a unified software tool for clonal ordering, visualization, and interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ClonEvol uses a bootstrap resampling technique to estimate the cellular fraction of the clones and probabilistically models the clonal ordering constraints to account for statistical variability. The bootstrapping allows identification of the sample founding- and sub-clones, thus enabling interpretation of clonal seeding. ClonEvol automates the generation of multiple widely used visualizations for reconstructing and interpreting clonal evolution. RESULTS: ClonEvol outperformed three of the state of the art tools (LICHeE, Canopy and PhyloWGS) for clonal evolution inference, showing more robust error tolerance and producing more accurate trees in a simulation. Building upon multiple recent publications that utilized ClonEvol to study metastasis and drug resistance in solid cancers, here we show that ClonEvol rediscovered relapsed subclones in two published acute myeloid leukemia patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that through noninvasive monitoring ClonEvol recapitulated the emerging subclones throughout metastatic progression observed in the tumors of a published breast cancer patient. CONCLUSIONS: ClonEvol has broad applicability for longitudinal monitoring of clonal populations in tumor biopsies, or noninvasively, to guide precision medicine. AVAILABILITY: ClonEvol is written in R and is available at https://github.com/ChrisMaherLab/ClonEvol.
BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of clonal evolution is critical for understanding tumor progression and implementing personalized therapies. This is often done by clustering somatic variants based on their cellular prevalence estimated via bulk tumor sequencing of multiple samples. The clusters, consisting of the clonal marker variants, are then ordered based on their estimated cellular prevalence to reconstruct clonal evolution trees, a process referred to as 'clonal ordering'. However, cellular prevalence estimate is confounded by statistical variability and errors in sequencing/data analysis, and therefore inhibits accurate reconstruction of the clonal evolution. This problem is further complicated by intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, the field lacks a comprehensive visualization tool to facilitate the interpretation of complex clonal relationships. To address these challenges we developed ClonEvol, a unified software tool for clonal ordering, visualization, and interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ClonEvol uses a bootstrap resampling technique to estimate the cellular fraction of the clones and probabilistically models the clonal ordering constraints to account for statistical variability. The bootstrapping allows identification of the sample founding- and sub-clones, thus enabling interpretation of clonal seeding. ClonEvol automates the generation of multiple widely used visualizations for reconstructing and interpreting clonal evolution. RESULTS: ClonEvol outperformed three of the state of the art tools (LICHeE, Canopy and PhyloWGS) for clonal evolution inference, showing more robust error tolerance and producing more accurate trees in a simulation. Building upon multiple recent publications that utilized ClonEvol to study metastasis and drug resistance in solid cancers, here we show that ClonEvol rediscovered relapsed subclones in two published acute myeloid leukemia patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that through noninvasive monitoring ClonEvol recapitulated the emerging subclones throughout metastatic progression observed in the tumors of a published breast cancer patient. CONCLUSIONS: ClonEvol has broad applicability for longitudinal monitoring of clonal populations in tumor biopsies, or noninvasively, to guide precision medicine. AVAILABILITY: ClonEvol is written in R and is available at https://github.com/ChrisMaherLab/ClonEvol.
Authors: Andrew McPherson; Andrew Roth; Emma Laks; Tehmina Masud; Ali Bashashati; Allen W Zhang; Gavin Ha; Justina Biele; Damian Yap; Adrian Wan; Leah M Prentice; Jaswinder Khattra; Maia A Smith; Cydney B Nielsen; Sarah C Mullaly; Steve Kalloger; Anthony Karnezis; Karey Shumansky; Celia Siu; Jamie Rosner; Hector Li Chan; Julie Ho; Nataliya Melnyk; Janine Senz; Winnie Yang; Richard Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Marco A Marra; Alexandre Bouchard-Côté; C Blake Gilks; David G Huntsman; Jessica N McAlpine; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Tanner M Johanns; Christopher A Miller; Ian G Dorward; Christina Tsien; Edward Chang; Arie Perry; Ravindra Uppaluri; Cole Ferguson; Robert E Schmidt; Sonika Dahiya; George Ansstas; Elaine R Mardis; Gavin P Dunn Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Amit G Deshwar; Shankar Vembu; Christina K Yung; Gun Ho Jang; Lincoln Stein; Quaid Morris Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Katherine A Hoadley; Marni B Siegel; Krishna L Kanchi; Christopher A Miller; Li Ding; Wei Zhao; Xiaping He; Joel S Parker; Michael C Wendl; Robert S Fulton; Ryan T Demeter; Richard K Wilson; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Elaine R Mardis Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: G L Uy; E J Duncavage; G S Chang; M A Jacoby; C A Miller; J Shao; S Heath; K Elliott; T Reineck; R S Fulton; C C Fronick; M O'Laughlin; L Ganel; C N Abboud; A F Cashen; J F DiPersio; R K Wilson; D C Link; J S Welch; T J Ley; T A Graubert; P Westervelt; M J Walter Journal: Leukemia Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Davide Prandi; Sylvan C Baca; Alessandro Romanel; Christopher E Barbieri; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Jacqueline Fontugne; Himisha Beltran; Andrea Sboner; Levi A Garraway; Mark A Rubin; Francesca Demichelis Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Muhammed Murtaza; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Katherine Pogrebniak; Oscar M Rueda; Elena Provenzano; John Grant; Suet-Feung Chin; Dana W Y Tsui; Francesco Marass; Davina Gale; H Raza Ali; Pankti Shah; Tania Contente-Cuomo; Hossein Farahani; Karey Shumansky; Zoya Kingsbury; Sean Humphray; David Bentley; Sohrab P Shah; Matthew Wallis; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Carlos Caldas Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Christopher S Hong; Juan C Vasquez; Adam J Kundishora; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Jason M Beckta; Amrita Sule; Asher M Marks; Nalin Leelatian; Anita Huttner; Ranjit S Bindra; Michael L DiLuna; Kristopher T Kahle; E Zeynep Erson-Omay Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 8.617
Authors: Audris Chiang; Caroline Z Tan; François Kuonen; Luqman M Hodgkinson; Felicia Chiang; Raymond J Cho; Andrew P South; Jean Y Tang; Anne Lynn S Chang; Kerri E Rieger; Anthony E Oro; Kavita Y Sarin Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Anniina Färkkilä; Alfredo Rodríguez; Jaana Oikkonen; Doga C Gulhan; Huy Nguyen; Julieta Domínguez; Sandra Ramos; Caitlin E Mills; Fernando Pérez-Villatoro; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Jia Zhou; Connor S Clairmont; Lisa A Moreau; Peter J Park; Peter K Sorger; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Sara Frias; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bridget K Marcellino; Noushin Farnoud; Bruno Cassinat; Min Lu; Emanuelle Verger; Erin McGovern; Minal Patel; Juan Medina-Martinez; Max Fine Levine; Juanes E Arango Ossa; Yangyu Zhou; Heidi Kosiorek; Meenakshi Mehrotra; Jane Houldsworth; Amylou Dueck; Michael Rossi; John Mascarenhas; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Raajit K Rampal; Ronald Hoffman Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-11-24
Authors: Gonzalo Recondo; Laura Mezquita; Francesco Facchinetti; David Planchard; Anas Gazzah; Ludovic Bigot; Ahsan Z Rizvi; Rosa L Frias; Jean Paul Thiery; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Tony Sourisseau; Karen Howarth; Olivier Deas; Dariia Samofalova; Justine Galissant; Pauline Tesson; Floriane Braye; Charles Naltet; Pernelle Lavaud; Linda Mahjoubi; Aurélie Abou Lovergne; Gilles Vassal; Rastilav Bahleda; Antoine Hollebecque; Claudio Nicotra; Maud Ngo-Camus; Stefan Michiels; Ludovic Lacroix; Catherine Richon; Nathalie Auger; Thierry De Baere; Lambros Tselikas; Eric Solary; Eric Angevin; Alexander M Eggermont; Fabrice Andre; Christophe Massard; Ken A Olaussen; Jean-Charles Soria; Benjamin Besse; Luc Friboulet Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 12.531