Literature DB >> 31842587

Vascular Landmark-Based Method for Highly Reproducible Measurement of Left Atrial Appendage Volume in Computed Tomography.

Andrew Schluchter1, Chelsea Jan1, Katherine Lowe1, Davis M Vigneault1,2, Francisco Contijoch1,3,4, Elliot R McVeigh1,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern computed tomographic scanning can produce 4-dimensional images of the left atrial appendage (LAA). LAA function and morphology can then be measured, to plan interventions such as occlusion and to evaluate LAA flow for thrombogenic risk analysis. A current problem here is defining a reproducible boundary between the LAA and the left atrium.
METHODS: This study used retrospectively gated 4-dimensional computed tomographic data from 25 implantation and coronary artery imaging patients. In each patient, the LAA ostium was defined at multiple time points during the RR interval. To examine the reproducibility of the definition of the LAA ostium, 3 observers analyzed all time frames in each patient 3 times. Five nonconsecutive time frames from each patient were then compared using intraclass correlation coefficients to quantify the precision of the method across patients. The correlation of LAA volumes for each time frame of each patient was determined across the different observers (interobserver) and within each observer's own data sets (intraobserver).
RESULTS: The method was successful in 92% of patients. Two-way random-effect, absolute-agreement, single-measurement intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver measurements were 0.984, 0.990, and 0.988, with intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.989, 0.989, and 0.995. The intraclass correlation coefficient of all observations was 0.988.
CONCLUSIONS: Classification of the LAA ostium using a stepwise procedure identifying the coumadin ridge and 2 vascular landmarks in ECG-gated computed tomography provides a viable method of establishing a highly reproducible boundary between the atrium and LAA needed to obtain LAA metrics useful for procedure planning and measuring LAA function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary vessels; heart atria; humans; retrospective studies; warfarin

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31842587      PMCID: PMC7685054          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  26 in total

1.  A novel method to estimate blood flow velocity in the left atrial appendage using enhanced computed tomography: role of Hounsfield unit density ratio at two distinct points within the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Ryobun Yasuoka; Takashi Kurita; Yasuhito Kotake; Yuzuru Akaiwa; Naotaka Hashiguchi; Koichiro Motoki; Hiromi Yamamoto; Kazuhiro Kobuke; Yoshitaka Iwanaga; Yutaka Hirano; Shunichi Miyazaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage.

Authors:  Y Agmon; B K Khandheria; F Gentile; J B Seward
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure.

Authors:  Jacqueline Saw; Peter Fahmy; Ryan Spencer; Roshan Prakash; Patrick McLaughlin; Savvas Nicolaou; Michael Tsang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-09

4.  Computed tomography measurement of the left atrial appendage for optimal sizing of the Watchman device.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Jorge Betancor; Kimi Sato; Serge Harb; Karim Abdur Rehman; Kunal Patel; Arnav Kumar; Paul C Cremer; Wael Jaber; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Paul Schoenhagen; Oussama Wazni
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-12-05

5.  Additional value of left atrial appendage geometry and hemodynamics when considering anticoagulation strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation with low CHA2DS2-VASc scores.

Authors:  Jung Myung Lee; Jin-Bae Kim; Jae-Sun Uhm; Hui-Nam Pak; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Luigi Di Biase; Rodney P Horton; Tuan Nguyen; Prasant Morhanty; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09

7.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Robby Nieuwlaat; Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  Detection of left atrial appendage thrombus by cardiac computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Syed Arman Husain; Iosif Kelesidis; Javier Sanz; Hector M Medina; Mario J Garcia
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.792

9.  Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study.

Authors:  Sumeet S Chugh; Rasmus Havmoeller; Kumar Narayanan; David Singh; Michiel Rienstra; Emelia J Benjamin; Richard F Gillum; Young-Hoon Kim; John H McAnulty; Zhi-Jie Zheng; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Mohsen Naghavi; George A Mensah; Majid Ezzati; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Left Atrial Appendage Function and Stroke Risk.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Christopher Song; William A Gray; Karen L Furie; Mitchell S V Elkind; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.