Literature DB >> 26728988

Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure.

Jacqueline Saw1, Peter Fahmy1, Ryan Spencer1, Roshan Prakash1, Patrick McLaughlin2, Savvas Nicolaou2, Michael Tsang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure requires accurate preprocedural measurements, and trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and fluoroscopy can be utilized. However, correlations between these measurements remain inadequately assessed.
METHODS: Patients who underwent LAA closure at Vancouver General Hospital who had baseline LAA measurements by CCTA, TEE, and fluoroscopy were included in this analysis. CCTAs were performed with prospective-ECG-gating with Toshiba 320-detector or Siemens second generation 128-slice dual-source scanners, and images interpreted with VitreaWorkstation.™ LAA maximal dimensions were obtained for all patients at: (1) Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP)/Amulet landing zone 10 mm within orifice, (2) WATCHMAN ostium, and (3) WATCHMAN depth measurements. Correlations and agreements were compared.
RESULTS: We report 50 consecutive patients who underwent LAA closure (8 ACP, 10 Amulet, 32 WATCHMAN). Average age was 75.2 ± 8.7 years, mean CHADS2 score 3.0 ± 1.3, and CHA2 DS2 -VASc 4.7 ± 1.5. Procedural device implantation success was 100%. For ACP landing zone, mean maximal measurements were 24.1 ± 4.7 mm with CCTA, 22.3 ± 4.9 mm TEE, and 19.9 ± 5.6 mm fluoroscopy (P < 0.001); R value 0.81 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.67 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.80 CTA/TEE. For WATCHMAN ostium, mean maximal measurements were 25.8 ± 4.7 mm CCTA (P < 0.001 vs. fluoroscopy, P = 0.16 vs. TEE), 25.1 ± 4.4 mm TEE (P = 0.016 vs. fluoroscopy), and 23.8 ± 4.9 mm fluoroscopy; R value 0.71 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.65 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.74 CTA/TEE. Depth measurements were 34.3 ± 5.7 mm with CCTA, 31.1 ± 6.5 mm TEE, and 27.8 ± 7.1 mm fluoroscopy (all P < 0.01); and correlations with R value 0.28 fluoroscopy/CTA, 0.22 fluoroscopy/TEE, and 0.56 CTA/TEE.
CONCLUSIONS: All 3 imaging modalities correlated with ACP landing zone and WATCHMAN ostium measurements, with CCTA providing the largest measurements, followed by TEE and fluoroscopy.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT angiography; TEE; WATCHMAN; amulet; atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage (LAA) closure; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26728988     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  14 in total

1.  Vascular Landmark-Based Method for Highly Reproducible Measurement of Left Atrial Appendage Volume in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Andrew Schluchter; Chelsea Jan; Katherine Lowe; Davis M Vigneault; Francisco Contijoch; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Personalized Fluoroscopic Angles in Watchman™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Landing Zone Assessment: A Three-Dimensional Printed Simulation Study.

Authors:  Vikram Shee; Liwei He; Shenrong Liu; Xingfu Huang; Yanyu Chen; Liangzhen Xie; Xiaojiang Deng; Jian Peng
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-23

3.  Left atrial appendage orifice diameter measured with trans-esophageal echocardiography is independently related with peri-device leakage after Watchman device implantation.

Authors:  Yu-Yi Chen; Yong-Hua Zhang; Xin Chen; Wei-Ping Huang; Bei Xu; Xi Su; Yan-Hong Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Complex Structural Interventions: The Role of Computed Tomography, Fluoroscopy, and Fusion Imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad A Hussain; Faisal Nabi
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  A Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography, Transesophageal and Intracardiac Echocardiography, and Fluoroscopy for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Authors:  Pavel Osmancik; Dalibor Herman; Hana Linkova; Marek Hozman; Marek Labos
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 6.  Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Treatments for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Laura Ueberham; Nikolaos Dagres; Tatjana S Potpara; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Left atrial appendage closure device implantation guided with fluoroscopy only: Long-term results.

Authors:  Yoga Yuniadi; Dicky A Hanafy; Sunu B Raharjo; Dony Yugo
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Iksung Cho; William D Kim; Oh Hyun Lee; Min Jae Cha; Jiwon Seo; Chi Young Shim; Hui-Nam Pak; Boyoung Joung; Geu-Ru Hong; Heidi Gransar; Seung Yong Shin; Jung-Sun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Additive Value of Preprocedural Computed Tomography Planning Versus Stand-Alone Transesophageal Echocardiogram Guidance to Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Comparison of Real-World Practice.

Authors:  Chak-Yu So; Guson Kang; Pedro A Villablanca; Abel Ignatius; Saleha Asghar; Dilshan Dhillon; James C Lee; Arfaat Khan; Gurjit Singh; Tiberio M Frisoli; Brian P O'Neill; Marvin H Eng; Thomas Song; Milan Pantelic; William W O'Neill; Dee Dee Wang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  A Comparative Study of Three Imaging Modalities for Size Selection of a Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device.

Authors:  Zhong-Bao Ruan; Fei Wang; Ge-Cai Chen; Li Zhu
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.