| Literature DB >> 31842473 |
Bach Xuan Tran1,2, Tracy Vo3, Anh Kim Dang4, Quang Nhat Nguyen1,4,5,6, Giang Thu Vu7, Linh Gia Vu7, Khanh Nam Do1, Carl A Latkin2, Cyrus S H Ho8, Roger C M Ho9,10,11.
Abstract
Industrial workers or factory workers, especially migrant workers, have been found to be vulnerable populations at risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, there has been a gap in literature regarding health behaviors of migrant factory workers. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 230 factory workers in Hanoi and Bac Ninh cities in Northern Vietnam from July to September 2018 to identify sexual risk practices and related factors among migrant and nonmigrant factory workers. Information collected regarding sexual behavior included the number of sexual partners in the previous 12 months and whether they used condoms in their last sexual intercourse. Two-thirds of participants reported having no sexual activity in the last 12 months, and there was a low percentage of participants using condoms in their last sexual intercourse. Being female, living with spouses/partners, and being a nonimmigrant had a negative association with the lack of using condoms in the last sexual intercourse with casual partners/sex workers, as opposed to having mobility and self-care problems and identifying as a binge drinker. Therefore, workplace-based prevention programs focusing on providing tailored sexual health education and promoting condom use among industrial workers, especially those who are immigrant or migrant workers, in Vietnam should be emphasized.Entities:
Keywords: Vietnam; condom use; factory worker; industrial worker; sexual risk behavior; sexually transmitted infections
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31842473 PMCID: PMC6950032 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic characteristics, general health status, and behaviors of participants (n = 230).
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
|
| 186 | 81.2 |
|
| ||
| Under high school | 17 | 7.5 |
| High school | 139 | 61.0 |
| Above high school | 72 | 31.5 |
|
| ||
| Single | 8 | 3.5 |
| Having spouse/partner | 222 | 96.5 |
|
| ||
| Parents | 115 | 50.4 |
| Wife/husband | 187 | 82.0 |
| Children | 139 | 61.0 |
| Brothers/sisters | 18 | 7.9 |
| Relatives | 2 | 0.9 |
| Colleague | 2 | 0.9 |
|
| 117 | 51.1 |
|
| ||
| Mobility | 76 | 34.1 |
| Self-care | 7 | 3.2 |
| Usual activities | 73 | 32.7 |
| Pain/Discomfort | 132 | 61.4 |
| Anxiety/Depression | 135 | 62.8 |
|
| 187 | 84.2 |
|
| 99 | 45.0 |
|
| 37 | 16.6 |
|
| 35 | 15.7 |
|
| ||
| Never-smokers | 183 | 85.5 |
| Former smokers | 14 | 6.6 |
| Current smokers | 17 | 7.9 |
|
|
| |
|
| 31.7 | 4.5 |
|
| 282.4 | 106.5 |
|
| 9.8 | 3.7 |
|
| 8.3 | 0.9 |
|
| 1.8 | 1.7 |
Sexual behaviors in the last 12 months among participants.
| Characteristic | Local People | Migrants | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
|
| 71 | 64.6 | 77 | 67.5 | 148 | 66.1 | 0.80 |
|
| |||||||
| None | 20 | 18.2 | 17 | 14.9 | 38 | 16.5 | 0.83 |
| One sex partner | 69 | 62.7 | 76 | 66.7 | 145 | 64.8 | |
| Two sex partners or more | 2 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.9 | 3 | 1.3 | |
| Don’t remember | 19 | 17.3 | 20 | 17.5 | 39 | 17.4 | |
|
| |||||||
| Spouse/intimate partners (n = 214) | 47 | 46.5 | 49 | 43.4 | 96 | 44.9 | 0.64 |
| Yes | 47 | 46.5 | 49 | 43.4 | 96 | 44.9 | 0.64 |
| No | 54 | 53.5 | 64 | 56.6 | 118 | 55.1 | |
| Sex workers (n = 177) | |||||||
| Yes | 11 | 12.8 | 7 | 7.7 | 18 | 10.2 | 0.15 |
| No | 16 | 18.6 | 10 | 11.0 | 26 | 14.7 | |
| Do not remember | 59 | 68.6 | 74 | 81.3 | 133 | 75.1 | |
| Casual partners without receiving money (n = 187) | |||||||
| Yes | 12 | 13.5 | 8 | 8.2 | 20 | 10.7 | 0.44 |
| No | 16 | 18.0 | 16 | 16.3 | 32 | 17.1 | |
| Do not remember | 61 | 68.5 | 74 | 75.5 | 135 | 72.2 | |
| Casual partners while receiving money (n = 178) | |||||||
| Yes | 11 | 12.9 | 6 | 6.5 | 17 | 9.5 | 0.23 |
| No | 11 | 12.9 | 9 | 9.7 | 20 | 11.2 | |
| Do not remember | 63 | 74.1 | 78 | 83.9 | 141 | 79.2 | |
Factors associated with not using a condom with casual partners or sex workers (n = 208).
| Characteristics | Not Using Condom with Casual Partners/Sex Workers in the Last Sexual Intercourse | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | ||
|
| 0.52 *** | 0.34; 0.79 | 0.00 |
|
| |||
| High school | 0.12 *** | 0.03; 0.43 | 0.00 |
| Above high school | 0.14 ** | 0.02; 0.98 | 0.05 |
|
| 0.19 ** | 0.04; 0.96 | 0.05 |
|
| 2.49 *** | 1.60; 3.88 | 0.00 |
|
| 1.06 ** | 1.01; 1.11 | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| Mobility problems (Yes vs. No) | 2.84 *** | 1.36; 5.93 | 0.01 |
| Self-care problems (Yes vs. No) | 4.85 *** | 2.48; 9.47 | 0.00 |
| Usual activities problems (Yes vs. No) | 0.52 * | 0.26; 1.04 | 0.06 |
| Pain/Discomfort (Yes vs. No) | 2.13 | 0.26; 17.56 | 0.48 |
| Anxiety/Depression (Yes vs. No) | 0.93 | 0.42; 2.10 | 0.87 |
|
| 0.94 *** | 0.89; 0.98 | 0.01 |
|
| 1.47 | 0.57; 3.77 | 0.42 |
|
| 0.30 | 0.04; 2.09 | 0.23 |
|
| 3.97 ** | 1.12; 4.15 | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| Former smokers | 1.06 | 0.54; 2.09 | 0.87 |
| Current smokers | 0.37 ** | 0.15; 0.91 | 0.03 |
*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1.