OBJECTIVE: To study patterns and determinants of HIV prevalence and risk-behaviour characteristics in different population groups in four border provinces of Viet Nam. METHODS: We surveyed four population groups during April-June 2002. We used stratified random-cluster sampling and collected data concomitantly on HIV status and risk behaviours. The groups included were female sex workers (n = 2023), injecting drug users (n = 1391), unmarried males aged 15-24 years (n = 1885) and different categories of mobile groups (n = 1923). FINDINGS: We found marked geographical contrasts in HIV prevalence, particularly among female sex workers (range 0-24%). The HIV prevalence among injecting drug users varied at high levels in all provinces (range 4-36%), whereas lower prevalences were found among both unmarried young men (range 0-1.3%) and mobile groups (range 0-2.5%). All groups reported sex with female sex workers. Less than 40% of the female sex workers had used condoms consistently. The strongest determinants of HIV infection among female sex workers were inconsistent condom use (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-11.8), history of injecting drug use and mobility, and, among injecting drug users, sharing of injection equipment (adjusted OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.3-24.0) and sex with non-regular partners (adjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-8.5). CONCLUSION: The finding of marked geographical variation in HIV prevalence underscores the value of understanding local contexts in the prevention of HIV infection. Although lacking support from data from all provinces, there would appear to be a potential for sex work to drive a self-sustaining heterosexual epidemic. That the close links to serious injecting drug use epidemics can have an accelerating effect in increasing the spread of HIV merits further study.
OBJECTIVE: To study patterns and determinants of HIV prevalence and risk-behaviour characteristics in different population groups in four border provinces of Viet Nam. METHODS: We surveyed four population groups during April-June 2002. We used stratified random-cluster sampling and collected data concomitantly on HIV status and risk behaviours. The groups included were female sex workers (n = 2023), injecting drug users (n = 1391), unmarried males aged 15-24 years (n = 1885) and different categories of mobile groups (n = 1923). FINDINGS: We found marked geographical contrasts in HIV prevalence, particularly among female sex workers (range 0-24%). The HIV prevalence among injecting drug users varied at high levels in all provinces (range 4-36%), whereas lower prevalences were found among both unmarried young men (range 0-1.3%) and mobile groups (range 0-2.5%). All groups reported sex with female sex workers. Less than 40% of the female sex workers had used condoms consistently. The strongest determinants of HIV infection among female sex workers were inconsistent condom use (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-11.8), history of injecting drug use and mobility, and, among injecting drug users, sharing of injection equipment (adjusted OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.3-24.0) and sex with non-regular partners (adjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.4-8.5). CONCLUSION: The finding of marked geographical variation in HIV prevalence underscores the value of understanding local contexts in the prevention of HIV infection. Although lacking support from data from all provinces, there would appear to be a potential for sex work to drive a self-sustaining heterosexual epidemic. That the close links to serious injecting drug use epidemics can have an accelerating effect in increasing the spread of HIV merits further study.
Authors: Anh Tuan Nguyen; Tran Hien Nguyen; Kim Chi Pham; Truong Giang Le; Duc Thang Bui; Thuy Long Hoang; Tobi Saidel; Roger Detels Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: A Buvé; E Lagarde; M Caraël; N Rutenberg; B Ferry; J R Glynn; M Laourou; E Akam; J Chege; T Sukwa Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Suphak Vanichseni; Don C Des Jarlais; Kachit Choopanya; Philip A Mock; Dwip Kitayaporn; Udomsak Sangkhum; Boonrawd Prasithiphol; Dale J Hu; Frits van Griensven; Timothy D Mastro; Jordan W Tappero Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Vonthanak Saphonn; Heng Sopheab; Ly Penh Sun; Mean Chhi Vun; Seng Suth Wantha; Pamina M Gorbach; Roger Detels Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2004-06
Authors: Neff Walker; Karen A Stanecki; Tim Brown; John Stover; Stefano Lazzari; Jesus Maria Garcia-Calleja; Bernhard Schwartländer; Peter D Ghys Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-10-17 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Eric Sanders-Buell; Meera Bose; Abdul Nasir; Catherine S Todd; M Raza Stanekzai; Sodsai Tovanabutra; Paul T Scott; Steffanie A Strathdee; Jeffrey Tjaden; Nelson L Michael; Francine E McCutchan Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Li Li; Nguyen Tran Hien; Chunqing Lin; Nguyen Anh Tuan; Le Anh Tuan; Shu C Farmer; Roger Detels Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2013-09-30
Authors: Vu Minh Quan; Vivian F Go; Le Van Nam; Anna Bergenstrom; Nguyen Phuong Thuoc; Jonathan Zenilman; Carl Latkin; David D Celentano Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2009-01
Authors: Christina M Schumacher; Vivian F Go; Le Van Nam; Carl A Latkin; Anna Bergenstrom; David D Celentano; Vu Minh Quan Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2008-11-17
Authors: Thuong Vu Nguyen; Nghia Van Khuu; Phuc Duy Nguyen; Hau Phuc Tran; Huong Thu Thi Phan; Lan Trong Phan; Roger Detels Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-10
Authors: Anastasia Pharris; Thi Kim Chuc Nguyen; Carol Tishelman; Ruairí Brugha; Phuong Hoa Nguyen; Anna Thorson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Trinh Thanh Thuy; N Sarita Shah; Mai Hoang Anh; Do Trong Nghia; Duong Thom; Truong Linh; Dinh Ngoc Sy; Bui Duc Duong; Luu Thi Minh Chau; Phuong Thi Phoung Mai; Charles D Wells; Kayla F Laserson; Jay K Varma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240