Literature DB >> 3184152

Measuring medical residents' chart-documentation practices.

M T Moran1, T H Wiser, J Nanda, H Gross.   

Abstract

To determine the adequacy of medical history documentation, investigators videotaped 26 clinical interviews performed by medical residents in ambulatory practice, and the contents of each videotape were compared with the corresponding entries in the medical record. The residents recorded a little over half of all medical history information observed on the videotapes. Medical issues were more often documented than psychosocial or health behaviors. The residents in their second postgraduate year had the best documentation practices regardless of their residency track (primary-care or traditional track). Also, no difference was noted between the performances of primary-care internal medicine residents and traditional internal medicine residents. For one-quarter of the patients, less than 40 percent of the information that was present on the videotapes was documented in their charts. The residents documented more-severe illnesses better than less-severe ones and documented the medical histories of older patients better than the histories of younger ones. The residents' records of health behavior and psychosocial concerns were less complete for women patients. To improve chart documentation, members of both the attending and the house staffs should review videotapes and corresponding medical records of clinical encounters to help them investigate factors causing inadequate chart-documentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3184152     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198811000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  10 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data.

Authors:  J R Logan; P N Gorman; B Middleton
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Paper versus electronic documentation in complex chronic illness: a comparison.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith; Saira N Haque
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

3.  Use of an outpatient medical record audit to achieve educational objectives: changes in residents' performances over six years.

Authors:  D E Kern; W L Harris; B O Boekeloo; L R Barker; P Hogeland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The voices of the medical record.

Authors:  S Poirier; D J Brauner
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1990-03

5.  Prediction scores do not correlate with clinically adjudicated categories of pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Christina Katsios; Marco Donadini; Maureen Meade; Sangeeta Mehta; Richard Hall; John Granton; Jim Kutsogiannis; Peter Dodek; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Lauralynn McIntyre; Nikolas Vlahakis; John Muscedere; Jan Friedrich; Robert Fowler; Yoanna Skrobik; Martin Albert; Michael Cox; James Klinger; Joseph Nates; Andrew Bersten; Chip Doig; Nicole Zytaruk; Mark Crowther; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.409

6.  Missed psychosocial risk factors during routine preoperative evaluations are associated with increased complications after elective cancer surgery.

Authors:  Patrick M Meyers; Ira L Leeds; Zachary O Enumah; Richard A Burkhart; Jin He; Elliott R Haut; Jonathan E Efron; Fabian M Johnston
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  Carlos M Soto; Kenneth P Kleinman; Steven R Simon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Agreement between physicians' office records and Medicare Part B claims data.

Authors:  J B Fowles; A G Lawthers; J P Weiner; D W Garnick; D S Petrie; R H Palmer
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1995

9.  The effect of referral templates on out-patient quality of care in a hospital setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Henrik Wåhlberg; Per Christian Valle; Siri Malm; Øistein Hovde; Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  An antimicrobial stewardship program improves antimicrobial treatment by culture site and the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Christina M Katsios; Lisa Burry; Sandra Nelson; Tanaz Jivraj; Stephen E Lapinsky; Randy S Wax; Michael Christian; Sangeeta Mehta; Chaim M Bell; Andrew M Morris
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.