Literature DB >> 3184003

Neuronal processing of conspecific and related calls in the torus semicircularis of Rana r. ridibunda Pall. (Anura): single-unit recordings.

B Diekamp1, H Schneider.   

Abstract

1. Single-unit responses in the torus semicircularis of Rana ridibunda were analyzed with regard to the neuronal mechanisms underlying call identification. Particular attention was directed to the question whether discrimination among the conspecific calls (mating, territorial and release calls), and between these and the mating calls of the related species R. lessonae and of the hybrid R. esculenta, can be explained by differences in the neuronal responses. 2. 75% of the single cells responded to at least one call. 25% of the neurons in this group were selective in the sense that they failed to respond to at least one of the calls. 3. Three of the single cells were selective for one type of call alone, the conspecific mating call in each case. Most of the selective neurons responded to three calls, having a preference either for the conspecific calls or for the amplitude-modulated mating calls. Such responses can be explained by the neurons' operation as either frequency or time filters. 4. Even the neurons that were nonselective, responding in some way to all the calls, differentiated among them with regard to response magnitude; that is, either the territorial and release calls elicited higher discharge rates than the amplitude-modulated mating calls, or the reverse. 69.8% of the single cells exhibited maximal responses to the conspecific mating call. The territorial and release calls elicited maximal responses in only 7.8% of the single cells. 5. In discrimination among the three mating calls, the temporal pattern of the calls plays a role. The differences in pulse-group timing are encoded by the overall response magnitude and not by way of differences in degree of synchronization. 66% of the nonselective neurons responded maximally to one of the three mating calls and very much less intensely to the other two. 6. No correlation was found between the types of call to which the various neurons responded maximally and the CF's of those neurons. Only very few cells represented a frequency and time filter exactly tuned to a particular call.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3184003     DOI: 10.1007/bf00604006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. I. Stimulation with acoustic clicks.

Authors:  W J Epping; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. II. Stimulation with amplitude modulated sound.

Authors:  W J Epping; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system.

Authors:  G J Rose; R R Capranica
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of estradiol on auditory evoked responses from the frog's auditory midbrain.

Authors:  S Yovanof; A S Feng
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1983-04-29       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for natural stimuli.

Authors:  A M Aertsen; J H Olders; P I Johannesma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Neural correlates of temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).

Authors:  E A Brenowitz; G Rose; R R Capranica
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  [Bio-acoustic investigations in the green frog, rana esculenta (L.)].

Authors:  Manfred Wahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Auditory and vocal nuclei in the frog brain concentrate sex hormones.

Authors:  D B Kelley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Vocal response of male European water frogs (Rana Esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls.

Authors:  J Brzoska
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  H C Gerhardt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  From behavioral context to receptors: serotonergic modulatory pathways in the IC.

Authors:  Laura M Hurley; Megan R Sullivan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Cell type, sub-region, and layer-specific speed representation in the hippocampal-entorhinal circuit.

Authors:  Motosada Iwase; Takuma Kitanishi; Kenji Mizuseki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A large-scale standardized physiological survey reveals functional organization of the mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Saskia E J de Vries; Jerome A Lecoq; Michael A Buice; Peter A Groblewski; Gabriel K Ocker; Michael Oliver; David Feng; Nicholas Cain; Peter Ledochowitsch; Daniel Millman; Kate Roll; Marina Garrett; Tom Keenan; Leonard Kuan; Stefan Mihalas; Shawn Olsen; Carol Thompson; Wayne Wakeman; Jack Waters; Derric Williams; Chris Barber; Nathan Berbesque; Brandon Blanchard; Nicholas Bowles; Shiella D Caldejon; Linzy Casal; Andrew Cho; Sissy Cross; Chinh Dang; Tim Dolbeare; Melise Edwards; John Galbraith; Nathalie Gaudreault; Terri L Gilbert; Fiona Griffin; Perry Hargrave; Robert Howard; Lawrence Huang; Sean Jewell; Nika Keller; Ulf Knoblich; Josh D Larkin; Rachael Larsen; Chris Lau; Eric Lee; Felix Lee; Arielle Leon; Lu Li; Fuhui Long; Jennifer Luviano; Kyla Mace; Thuyanh Nguyen; Jed Perkins; Miranda Robertson; Sam Seid; Eric Shea-Brown; Jianghong Shi; Nathan Sjoquist; Cliff Slaughterbeck; David Sullivan; Ryan Valenza; Casey White; Ali Williford; Daniela M Witten; Jun Zhuang; Hongkui Zeng; Colin Farrell; Lydia Ng; Amy Bernard; John W Phillips; R Clay Reid; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A segregated cortical stream for retinal direction selectivity.

Authors:  Rune Rasmussen; Akihiro Matsumoto; Monica Dahlstrup Sietam; Keisuke Yonehara
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.