Shampa Das1,2, Diansong Zhou3, Wright W Nichols3,4, Andy Townsend5,6, Paul Newell5,7, Jianguo Li3,8. 1. AstraZeneca, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK. shampa.das@liverpool.ac.uk. 2. Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Sherrington Building, L69 3GA, Liverpool, UK. shampa.das@liverpool.ac.uk. 3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 35 Gatehouse Drive, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. 4. Didsbury, Manchester, UK. 5. AstraZeneca, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK. 6. Pfizer, Walton Oaks, UK. 7. F2G Ltd., Manchester, UK. 8. , Chadds Ford, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime-avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the "perfect storm" of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NP patient population. METHODS: This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime-avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime-avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE. CONCLUSIONS: This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.
PURPOSE:Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), among other indications. In the phase III REPROVE trial (NCT01808092), ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including VAP. As ceftazidime-avibactam was not studied in patients with NP prior to REPROVE, selecting an appropriate dosage regimen in the "perfect storm" of NP required careful consideration of potential determinants and confounders of response specific to the NPpatient population. METHODS: This review describes the series of preclinical studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses that supported ceftazidime-avibactam dosage selection for patients with NP/VAP (2000/500 mg by 2-h intravenous infusion every 8 h, adjusted for renal function). In parallel, important considerations for antibiotic dosage selection in patients with NP are highlighted, including adequate drug penetration into the lungs, the suitability of murine-derived plasma PK/PD targets, evaluation of MIC distributions against clinical bacterial isolates from patients with NP, and consideration of PK in patients with NP, who are often critically ill. These analyses also supported the European approval of ceftazidime-avibactam for adults with HAP, including VAP, before the completion of REPROVE. CONCLUSIONS: This work serves as a successful practical example of dosage design for a new antibacterial drug therapy in the indication of NP, including VAP, where previous drug therapies have failed, possibly as a result of evaluation of too few variables, thereby limiting the accuracy of pharmacodynamic predictions.
Authors: F Bressolle; J E de la Coussaye; R Ayoub; D Fabre; R Gomeni; G Saissi; J J Eledjam; M Galtier Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Helio S Sader; Mariana Castanheira; Rodrigo E Mendes; Robert K Flamm; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Jonathan R Edwards; Chesley L Richards; Teresa C Horan; Robert P Gaynes; Daniel A Pollock; Denise M Cardo Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Wright W Nichols; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jason A Roberts; Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jeffrey Lipman; Johan W Mouton; Alexander A Vinks; Timothy W Felton; William W Hope; Andras Farkas; Michael N Neely; Jerome J Schentag; George Drusano; Otto R Frey; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Joseph L Kuti Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Florian M Wagenlehner; Jack D Sobel; Paul Newell; Jon Armstrong; Xiangning Huang; Gregory G Stone; Katrina Yates; Leanne B Gasink Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Shampa Das; Richard Fitzgerald; Asad Ullah; Marcin Bula; Andrea M Collins; Elena Mitsi; Jesus Reine; Helen Hill; Jamie Rylance; Daniela M Ferreira; Karen Tripp; Andrea Bertasini; Samantha Franzoni; Mameli Massimiliano; Omar Lahlou; Paola Motta; Philip Barth; Patrick Velicitat; Philipp Knechtle; William Hope Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Philipp Knechtle; Stuart Shapiro; Ian Morrissey; Cyntia De Piano; Adam Belley Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 5.191