Literature DB >> 31836499

Sperm selection in assisted reproduction: A review of established methods and cutting-edge possibilities.

Giuseppina Marzano1, Maria Serena Chiriacò2, Elisabetta Primiceri3, Maria Elena Dell'Aquila4, João Ramalho-Santos5, Vincenzo Zara6, Alessandra Ferramosca7, Giuseppe Maruccio8.   

Abstract

Male infertility often involves idiopathic or unknown causes, leading to an increasing demand for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Conventional sperm sorting techniques rely on centrifugation steps that are known to cause oxidative stress and consequently damage cells. Alternative novel techniques have been introduced but offer disadvantages that need to be overcome. These techniques are also employed to increase the number and the quality of subjects in the animal breeding industry, to obtain purebred subjects or to preserve endangered animal species. Microfluidics deals with the manipulation of small amounts of volume within a microdevice known as lab-on-a-chip (LOC), which offers rapid analyses, ease of use, small reagent sample volumes, high-throughput processing and wide reproducibility owing to automation and standardization. As the LOC allows gamete handling within a microenvironment that strictly mimics physiological in vivo conditions and avoids centrifugation steps and long processing time, the use of microfluidics for sperm sorting and selection have been proposed during the last 15 years and is currently under investigation. Moreover, LOC technologies to sort, identify and analyse other kinds of cells could be transferred to sperm selection and analysis, thus opening the way to a novel approach to the sperm cell selection and manipulation. This review describes the techniques routinely performed in human and animal clinical practice for sorting good-quality sperm for in vitro fertilization procedures, and focuses on the positive and negative aspects of each method. Emerging microfluidic devices, recently proposed for sperm selection, are also described and, when possible, compared with standard methods.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal sperm; Assisted reproduction technologies; Human sperm; ICSI; In vitro fertilization; Lab-on-chip; Microfluidic devices; Non-invasive procedures; Sperm selection; Sperm sorting

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31836499     DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Adv        ISSN: 0734-9750            Impact factor:   14.227


  12 in total

Review 1.  The influence of the female reproductive tract and sperm features on the design of microfluidic sperm-sorting devices.

Authors:  Nima Ahmadkhani; Mahshid Hosseini; Maryam Saadatmand; Alireza Abbaspourrad
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Microfluidic chips as a method for sperm selection improve fertilization rate in couples with fertilization failure.

Authors:  Jamileh Sadat Mirsanei; Nadia Sheibak; Zahra Zandieh; Mehdi Mehdizadeh; Reza Aflatoonian; Maryamsadat Tabatabaei; Atieh Sadat Mousavi; Fatemehsadat Amjadi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Embryologic outcomes among patients using a microfluidics chip compared to density gradient centrifugation to process sperm: a paired analysis.

Authors:  Prachi Godiwala; Emilse Almanza; Jane Kwieraga; Reeva Makhijani; Daniel Grow; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Alison Bartolucci; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Hitting the wall: Human sperm velocity recovery under ultra-confined conditions.

Authors:  Matías A Bettera Marcat; María N Gallea; Gastón L Miño; Marisa A Cubilla; Adolfo J Banchio; Laura C Giojalas; Verónica I Marconi; Héctor A Guidobaldi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 5.  Advancements in Microfluidic Systems for the Study of Female Reproductive Biology.

Authors:  Vedant V Bodke; Joanna E Burdette
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Sperm selection during ICSI treatments reduces single- but not double-strand DNA break values compared to the semen sample.

Authors:  Sandra Lara-Cerrillo; Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Candela Rosado-Iglesias; Tania Lacruz-Ruiz; Jordi Benet; Agustín García-Peiró
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Male Infertility is a Women's Health Issue-Research and Clinical Evaluation of Male Infertility Is Needed.

Authors:  Katerina A Turner; Amarnath Rambhatla; Samantha Schon; Ashok Agarwal; Stephen A Krawetz; James M Dupree; Tomer Avidor-Reiss
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Centrifugation Force and Time Alter CASA Parameters and Oxidative Status of Cryopreserved Stallion Sperm.

Authors:  Giuseppina Marzano; Natalina Moscatelli; Mariangela Di Giacomo; Nicola Antonio Martino; Giovanni Michele Lacalandra; Maria Elena Dell'Aquila; Giuseppe Maruccio; Elisabetta Primiceri; Maria Serena Chiriacò; Vincenzo Zara; Alessandra Ferramosca
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 9.  Seminal Plasma: Relevant for Fertility?

Authors:  Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez; Emilio A Martinez; Juan J Calvete; Fernando J Peña Vega; Jordi Roca
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The Future of IVF: The New Normal in Human Reproduction.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Gary D Smith; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.