| Literature DB >> 31835697 |
Xinfu Yuan1, Jinli Zhang1, Rui Zhang1, Jingyuan Liu1, Wentao Wang1,2, Hanxue Hou1.
Abstract
In this study, two types of antibacterial montmorillonites (Mt) were prepared using a facile method. The Mt modified with ε-polylysine hydrochloride (ε-PL) was named PL-Mt, while the Mt dually modified with dioctadecyl dimethylammonium chloride (D1821) and ε-PL was named PL-OMt. The results of the X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the PL-Mt indicated that 30% ε-PL was the most suitable amount for intercalating the Mt. The particle size and distribution of the ε-PL in the solution demonstrated that the Mt d-value could not be further increased owing to the increasing ε-PL diameter. The result of the X-ray diffraction of PL-OMt displayed that ultrasonic treatment at 600 W facilitated ε-PL to intercalate into the OMt interlayer space. The PL-OMt prepared with ultrasonic treatment at 600 W exhibited antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis superior to that of the PL-OMt prepared with higher-power ultrasonic treatment. Thus, the addition of 30% ε-PL based on the dry Mt mass is the most suitable ratio for preparing PL-Mt, while ultrasonic treatment at 600 W is the most suitable for preparing PL-OMt. These findings may expand the application fields of ε-PL.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; montmorillonite; ultrasonic treatment; ε-polylysine hydrochloride
Year: 2019 PMID: 31835697 PMCID: PMC6947220 DOI: 10.3390/ma12244148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns for Mt modified with ε-PL at various amounts.
Particle size and distribution of ε-PL with various concentrations.
| ε-PL Concentration (g/100 mL Water) | Parameters | PDI |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Diameter (nm) | ||
| 1% | 1134.7 ± 53.4 c | 0.211 ± 0.167 a |
| 3% | 1218.5 ± 98.7 c | 0.181 ± 0.102 a |
| 5% | 1413.8 ± 68.8 b | 0.152 ± 0.107 a |
| 7% | 1579.3 ± 21.9 a | 0.146 ± 0.050 a |
a–c Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). The data represented in mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3).
Figure 2Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of ε-PL, Mt, PL-Mt10, PL-Mt30, PL-Mt50 and PL-Mt70 (a); magnification of 1700 to 1500 cm−1 range of PL-Mt (b).
Figure 3Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of Mt (a), PL-Mt10 (b), PL-Mt30 (c), PL-Mt50 (d) and PL-Mt70 (e).
Figure 4Antibacterial activity of control (a), Mt (b) and PL-Mt30 (c) on E. coli and B. subtilis.
Figure 5XRD patterns of Mt and OMt (a) and PL-OMt (b).
d001-values of OMt and PL-OMt prepared at different ultrasonic powers.
| Ultrasonic Power (W) | Interlayer Space (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OMt | PL-OMt | ||
| 0 | 3.00 | 3.64 | 0.64 |
| 600 | 3.13 | 3.83 | 0.70 |
| 1200 | 3.13 | 3.66 | 0.53 |
| 1800 | 3.20 | 3.68 | 0.48 |
d = d001-value of PL-OMt minus d001-value of OMt.
Figure 6FTIR spectra Mt and OMt (a) and PL-OMt (b).
Figure 7Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetry (DTG) of ε-PL andD1821(a), OMt (b) and PL-OMt (c).
Figure 8Antibacterial activity of control, OMt and PL-OMt on E. coli and B. subtilis.