Literature DB >> 31834973

Information on surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on YouTube is highly biased and misleading.

Patrick Betschart1, Manolis Pratsinis1, Gautier Müllhaupt1, Roman Rechner1, Thomas Rw Herrmann2, Christian Gratzke3, Hans-Peter Schmid1, Valentin Zumstein1, Dominik Abt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of videos on the surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) available on YouTube, given that such video-sharing platforms are frequently used as sources of patient information and the therapeutic landscape of LUTS/BPH has evolved substantially during recent years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options for LUTS/BPH was performed in May 2019. Measures assessed included basic data (e.g. number of views), grade of misinformation and reporting of conflicts of interest. The quality of content was analysed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: A total of 159 videos with a median (range) of 8570 (648-2 384 391) views were included in the analysis. Only 21 videos (13.2%) were rated as containing no misinformation, 26 (16.4%) were free of commercial bias, and two (1.3%) disclosed potential conflicts of interest. According to DISCERN, the median overall quality of the videos was low (2 out of 5 points for question 16). Only four of the 15 assessed categories (bipolar and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, transurethral resection of the prostate and patient-based search terms) were scored as having moderate median overall quality (3 points).
CONCLUSION: Most videos on the surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH on YouTube had a low quality of content, provided misinformation, were subject to commercial bias and did not report on conflicts of interest. These findings emphasize the importance of thorough doctor-patient communication and active recommendation of unbiased patient education materials.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #UroBPH; YouTube; benign prostatic syndrome; lower urinary tract symptoms; patient information; social media

Year:  2020        PMID: 31834973     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

1.  Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTubeTM" on Phimosis.

Authors:  Simone Cilio; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Carmine Turco; Massimiliano Creta; Marco Capece; Roberto La Rocca; Giuseppe Celentano; Gianluigi Califano; Simone Morra; Alberto Melchionna; Francesco Mangiapia; Felice Crocetto; Paolo Verze; Alessandro Palmieri; Ciro Imbimbo; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Mikkel Fode; Alexander B Nolsøe; Frederik M Jacobsen; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Peter B Østergren; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Maarten Albersen; Paolo Capogrosso; Jens Sønksen
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.491

3.  An analysis of misleading YouTube videos on urological conditions: what to do about the danger of spreading misinformation of the YouTube videos?

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Numan Baydilli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  YouTube: A good source for retrograde intrarenal surgery?

Authors:  Senol Tonyali
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

5.  Educational value of YouTube Surgical Videos of Thulium Laser Enucleation of The Prostate (ThuLEP): the quality assessment.

Authors:  Kunlin Yang; Yisen Meng; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

6.  Analyzing the quality and validity of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) videos on social media.

Authors:  Emrullah Sogutdelen; Senol Tonyali
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study.

Authors:  Kapil Chaudhary; Abhishek Chandna; Sudheer Kumar Devana; Aditya Prakash Sharma; Shantanu Tyagi; Shrawan K Singh
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-01

8.  YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Meningiomas: A Content Quality and Audience Engagement Analysis.

Authors:  Michał Krakowiak; Justyna Fercho; Kaja Piwowska; Rami Yuser; Tomasz Szmuda; Paweł Słoniewski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.