| Literature DB >> 31834916 |
Ji Eun Park1, Jessica Yun1, Sang Joon Kim1, Woo Hyun Shim1, Jungsu S Oh2, Minyoung Oh2, Jee Hoon Roh3, Sang Won Seo4, Seung Jun Oh2, Jae Seung Kim2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the in vivo whole-brain relationship between uptake of [18F]THK-5351 on PET and cortical atrophy on structural MRI according to the presence and severity of Alzheimer's disease (AD).Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31834916 PMCID: PMC6910674 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics of the study participants.
| NC | MCI | AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 21 | 32 | 12 | |
| Age (years, median) | 71 (IQR 66–75) | 71.5 (IQR 67.5–76) | 61 (IQR 55–69) | .011 |
| Sex (M/F) | 6/15 | 14/18 | 8/4 | .104 |
| Education (years, median) | 9 (IQR 6–14.5) | 12 (IQR 7.5–16) | 9 (IQR 6–16) | .339 |
| APOE (0/1/2 ε4 allele) | (17/3/0) | (15/12/1) | (8/1/1) | .395 |
| MMSE score (median) | 29 (IQR 27.8–29.2) | 26 (IQR 23–27) | 19 (IQR 15.7–21.7) | < .001 |
| β-amyloid PET (+) | 0 | 16 (50%) | 9 (75%) | < .0001 |
| Days between MRI and [18F]THK-5351 PET | 56 (IQR 25–88) | 41 (IQR 20.5–83) | 51.5 (IQR 28–93) | .969 |
| Days between MRI and beta-amyloid PET | 23 (IQR 10–37) | 21 (IQR 11–38.5) | 9 (IQR 5–18.5) | .21 |
| Days between [18F]THK-5351 PET and beta-amyloid PET | 15 (IQR 3.7–63.7) | 36 (IQR 1–70.2) | 36.5 (IQR 15–67.5) | .70 |
Abbreviations-NC, normal controls; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Exam; IQR, interquartile range
Comparison of locations showing correlations between THK-5351 uptake and cortical volume, demonstrated with in vivo Braak composite locations across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum.
| Significant locations | NC | MCI | AD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transentorhinal | Entorhinal | -0.132 (.561) | ||
| Hippocampus | 0.254 (.265) | -0.260 (.150) | -0.474 (.118) | |
| Limbic | Parahippocampal | -0.119 (.607) | -0.372 (.232) | |
| Middle temporal | -0.238 (.300) | |||
| Temporal pole | -0.031 (.895) | -0.442 (.150) | ||
| Isthmus cingulate | -0.216 (.346) | -0.073 (.689) | ||
| Isocortical | Pars triangularis | -0.345 (.126) | -0.306 (.333) | |
| Lateral orbitofrontal | 0.018 (.938) | -0.516 (.086) | ||
| Superior frontal | -0.278 (.221) | -0.176 (.335) | ||
| Superior temporal | -0.121 (.600) | -0.259 (.152) | ||
| Precuneus | -0.107 (.543) | -0.284 (.230) | ||
| Supramarginal | -0.188 (.414) | -0.228 (.210) | ||
| Inferior parietal | -0.141 (.543) | -0.218 (.230) | ||
| Superior parietal | 0.042 (.855) | -0.112 (.541) |
Note.-Correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson’s correlation. Each location is represented by the average value of the left and right regions. The numbers in parentheses are P-values. Bold text indicates locations exhibiting statistical significance.
Comparisons between β-amyloid PET-positive and PET-negative groups.
| Significant locations | Aβ (+) | Aβ (-) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transentorhinal | Entorhinal | -0.221 (.170) | |
| Hippocampus | -0.115 (.481) | ||
| Limbic | Parahippocampal | -0.267 (.095) | |
| Middle temporal | |||
| Temporal pole | |||
| Isthmus cingulate | -0.364 (.073) | ||
| Isocortical | Pars triangularis | -0.112 (.491) | |
| Lateral orbitofrontal | -0.112 (.490) | ||
| Superior frontal | -0.162 (.317) | ||
| Superior temporal | -0.121 (.457) | ||
| Precuneus | -0.409 (.052) | ||
| Supramarginal | -0.308 (.053) | ||
| Inferior parietal | -0.346 (.263) | ||
| Superior parietal | -0.224 (.282) | -0.351 (.052) |
Note.-Correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson’s correlation. Each location is represented by the average value of the left and right regions. The numbers in parentheses are P-values. Bold text indicates locations exhibiting statistical significance.