Liang Wang1, Tammie L Benzinger2, Yi Su3, Jon Christensen3, Karl Friedrichsen3, Patricia Aldea3, Jonathan McConathy4, Nigel J Cairns1, Anne M Fagan5, John C Morris5, Beau M Ances6. 1. Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri2The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 2. The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri3Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham. 5. Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri2The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri5The Hope Center for Neurological Disorders at Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri2The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri3Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri5The Hope Center for Neurological Disorders at Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: In vivo tau imaging may become a diagnostic marker for Alzheimer disease (AD) and provides insights into the pathophysiology of AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of [18F]-AV-1451 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to stage AD and assess the associations among β-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and volume loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An imaging study conducted at Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri. A total of 59 participants who were cognitively normal (CN) (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] score, 0) or had AD dementia (CDR score, >0) were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of [18F]-AV-1451 in the hippocampus and a priori-defined AD cortical signature regions, cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42, hippocampal volume, and AD signature cortical thickness. RESULTS: Of the 59 participants, 38 (64%) were male; mean (SD) age was 74 (6) years. The [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR in the hippocampus and AD cortical signature regions distinguished AD from CN participants (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range [95% CI], 0.89 [0.73-1.00] to 0.98 [0.92-1.00]). An [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR cutoff value of 1.19 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 86%) from AD cortical signature regions best separated cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42-positive (Aβ+) AD from cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42-negative (Aβ-) CN participants. This same cutoff also divided Aβ+ CN participants into low vs high tau groups. Moreover, the presence of Aβ+ was associated with an elevated [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR in AD cortical signature regions (Aβ+ participants: mean [SD], 1.3 [0.3]; Aβ- participants: 1.1 [0.1]; F = 4.3, P = .04) but not in the hippocampus. The presence of Aβ+ alone was not related to hippocampal volume or AD signature cortical thickness. An elevated [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR was associated with volumetric loss in both the hippocampus and AD cortical signature regions. The observed [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR volumetric association was modified by Aβ status in the hippocampus but not in AD cortical signature regions. An inverse association between hippocampal [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR and volume was seen in Aβ+ participants (R2 = 0.55; P < .001) but not Aβ- (R2 = 0; P = .97) participants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Use of [18F]-AV-1451 has a potential for staging of the preclinical and clinical phases of AD. β-Amyloid interacts with hippocampal and cortical tauopathy to affect neurodegeneration. In the absence of Aβ, hippocampal tau deposition may be insufficient for the neurodegenerative process that leads to AD.
IMPORTANCE: In vivo tau imaging may become a diagnostic marker for Alzheimer disease (AD) and provides insights into the pathophysiology of AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of [18F]-AV-1451 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to stage AD and assess the associations among β-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and volume loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An imaging study conducted at Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri. A total of 59 participants who were cognitively normal (CN) (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] score, 0) or had AD dementia (CDR score, >0) were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of [18F]-AV-1451 in the hippocampus and a priori-defined AD cortical signature regions, cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42, hippocampal volume, and AD signature cortical thickness. RESULTS: Of the 59 participants, 38 (64%) were male; mean (SD) age was 74 (6) years. The [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR in the hippocampus and AD cortical signature regions distinguished AD from CN participants (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range [95% CI], 0.89 [0.73-1.00] to 0.98 [0.92-1.00]). An [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR cutoff value of 1.19 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 86%) from AD cortical signature regions best separated cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42-positive (Aβ+) AD from cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42-negative (Aβ-) CN participants. This same cutoff also divided Aβ+ CN participants into low vs high tau groups. Moreover, the presence of Aβ+ was associated with an elevated [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR in AD cortical signature regions (Aβ+ participants: mean [SD], 1.3 [0.3]; Aβ- participants: 1.1 [0.1]; F = 4.3, P = .04) but not in the hippocampus. The presence of Aβ+ alone was not related to hippocampal volume or AD signature cortical thickness. An elevated [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR was associated with volumetric loss in both the hippocampus and AD cortical signature regions. The observed [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR volumetric association was modified by Aβ status in the hippocampus but not in AD cortical signature regions. An inverse association between hippocampal [18F]-AV-1451 SUVR and volume was seen in Aβ+ participants (R2 = 0.55; P < .001) but not Aβ- (R2 = 0; P = .97) participants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Use of [18F]-AV-1451 has a potential for staging of the preclinical and clinical phases of AD. β-Amyloid interacts with hippocampal and cortical tauopathy to affect neurodegeneration. In the absence of Aβ, hippocampal tau deposition may be insufficient for the neurodegenerative process that leads to AD.
Authors: Nobuyuki Okamura; Shozo Furumoto; Michelle T Fodero-Tavoletti; Rachel S Mulligan; Ryuichi Harada; Paul Yates; Svetlana Pejoska; Yukitsuka Kudo; Colin L Masters; Kazuhiko Yanai; Christopher C Rowe; Victor L Villemagne Journal: Brain Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Irina Alafuzoff; Eileen H Bigio; Constantin Bouras; Heiko Braak; Nigel J Cairns; Rudolph J Castellani; Barbara J Crain; Peter Davies; Kelly Del Tredici; Charles Duyckaerts; Matthew P Frosch; Vahram Haroutunian; Patrick R Hof; Christine M Hulette; Bradley T Hyman; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Kurt A Jellinger; Gregory A Jicha; Enikö Kövari; Walter A Kukull; James B Leverenz; Seth Love; Ian R Mackenzie; David M Mann; Eliezer Masliah; Ann C McKee; Thomas J Montine; John C Morris; Julie A Schneider; Joshua A Sonnen; Dietmar R Thal; John Q Trojanowski; Juan C Troncoso; Thomas Wisniewski; Randall L Woltjer; Thomas G Beach Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Yi Su; Tyler M Blazey; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Daniel S Marcus; Beau M Ances; Randall J Bateman; Nigel J Cairns; Patricia Aldea; Lisa Cash; Jon J Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Russ C Hornbeck; Angela M Farrar; Christopher J Owen; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; William Klunk; Julie C Price; Paul M Thompson; Bernadino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Peter R Schofield; Virginia Buckles; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Jennifer L Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; Keith A Josephs; Joseph E Parisi; Maria S Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: G Lace; G M Savva; G Forster; R de Silva; C Brayne; F E Matthews; J J Barclay; L Dakin; P G Ince; S B Wharton Journal: Brain Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Keith A Johnson; Aaron Schultz; Rebecca A Betensky; J Alex Becker; Jorge Sepulcre; Dorene Rentz; Elizabeth Mormino; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Rebecca Amariglio; Kate Papp; Gad Marshall; Mark Albers; Samantha Mauro; Lesley Pepin; Jonathan Alverio; Kelly Judge; Marlie Philiossaint; Timothy Shoup; Daniel Yokell; Bradford Dickerson; Teresa Gomez-Isla; Bradley Hyman; Neil Vasdev; Reisa Sperling Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Heiko Braak; Irina Alafuzoff; Thomas Arzberger; Hans Kretzschmar; Kelly Del Tredici Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2006-08-12 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Marta Marquié; Michael Siao Tick Chong; Alejandro Antón-Fernández; Eline E Verwer; Nil Sáez-Calveras; Avery C Meltzer; Prianca Ramanan; Ana C Amaral; Jose Gonzalez; Marc D Normandin; Matthew P Frosch; Teresa Gómez-Isla Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Hee Jin Kim; Seongbeom Park; Hanna Cho; Young Kyoung Jang; Jin San Lee; Hyemin Jang; Yeshin Kim; Ko Woon Kim; Young Hoon Ryu; Jae Yong Choi; Seung Hwan Moon; Michael W Weiner; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici; Charles DeCarli; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Syed Faraz Kazim; Joon Ho Seo; Riccardo Bianchi; Chloe S Larson; Abhijeet Sharma; Robert K S Wong; Kirill Y Gorbachev; Ana C Pereira Journal: eNeuro Date: 2021-04-23
Authors: Jeremy A Elman; Matthew S Panizzon; Daniel E Gustavson; Carol E Franz; Mark E Sanderson-Cimino; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Veronika Hanko; Alexandra C Apple; Kathryn I Alpert; Kristen N Warren; Julie A Schneider; Konstantinos Arfanakis; David A Bennett; Lei Wang Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.673