Literature DB >> 27032377

Prescription of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after high-risk, abdominopelvic cancer surgery.

Jason D Wright1, Ling Chen2, Soledad Jorge2, William M Burke3, Ana I Tergas4, June Y Hou3, Jim C Hu5, Alfred I Neugut6, Cande V Ananth7, Dawn L Hershman6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis for 4weeks after discharge has been demonstrated to reduce venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in cancer patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery and is recommended in national guidelines. We examined the utilization and effectiveness of extended-duration low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis in high-risk cancer patients.
METHODS: We analyzed patients with colon, ovarian, and uterine cancer who underwent surgery from 2009 to 2013 and who were recorded in the MarketScan database. Multivariable models and propensity score analysis with inverse probability of treatment weight were developed to examine uptake and predictors of use of post-discharge low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), as well as associated adverse events (transfusion, and hemorrhage).
RESULTS: A total of 63,280 patients were identified. Use of extended-duration prophylaxis increased from 2009 to 2013 from 1.4% to 1.7% (P=0.67) for colectomy, 5.9% to 18.3% for ovarian cancer surgery (P<0.001), and 6.3% to 12.2% (P<0.001) for hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. There was no association between use of extended-duration prophylaxis and reductions in VTE for any of the procedures: colectomy (2.4% with extended-duration prophylaxis vs. 2.9% without prophylaxis, OR=0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.31), ovarian cancer-directed surgery (3.7% vs. 3.6%, OR=1.01; 95% CI, 0.76-1.33), hysterectomy (2.1% vs. 2.1%; OR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.38). Extended-duration prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative events: 2.20 (95% CI, 1.51-3.19) after colectomy, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.92-1.68) following ovarian cancer-directed surgery and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.66-1.48) for hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
CONCLUSION: Use of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis is low among high-risk cancer patients undergoing surgery.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heparin; Low molecular weight heparin; Prophylactic; Prophylaxis; Pulmonary embolism; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27032377      PMCID: PMC4877256          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  31 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery.

Authors:  P Mismetti; S Laporte; J Y Darmon; A Buchmüller; H Decousus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Extended perioperative thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer. A systematic review.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Irene Terrenato; Maddalena Barba; Francesca Sperati; Paola Muti; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

Authors:  Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.

Authors:  Valerie S Harder; Elizabeth A Stuart; James C Anthony
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-09

7.  Quality of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Sharyn N Lewin; Monjri Shah; William M Burke; Shing M Lee; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Incidence and prevention of deep venous thrombosis occurring late after general surgery: randomised controlled study of prolonged thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  I Lausen; R Jensen; L N Jorgensen; M S Rasmussen; K M Lyng; M Andersen; H O Raaschou; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-09

9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Duration and magnitude of the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism in middle aged women: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Siân Sweetland; Jane Green; Bette Liu; Amy Berrington de González; Marianne Canonico; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-12-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after abdominopelvic cancer surgery: a retrospective review.

Authors:  M Laureano; M Ebraheem; M Crowther
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery.

Authors:  Brett E Youngerman; Evan F Joiner; Xianling Wang; Jingyan Yang; Mary R Welch; Guy M McKhann; Jason D Wright; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.130

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.