| Literature DB >> 31834475 |
Julien Grosse1, Edem Allado2, Camille Roux2, Audrey Pierreisnard3, Marion Couderc4, Isabelle Clerc-Urmes5, Thomas Remen5, Éliane Albuisson5, Marcelo De Carvalho-Bittencourt6, Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere2,7, Damien Loeuille2,7.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence, localization, and severity of bone erosions on radiography (RX) and ultrasonography (US) according to ACPA status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 78 patients with ACPA-positive (ACPA+) RA and 30 patients with ACPA-negative (ACPA-) RA fulfilling the ACR 1987 and/or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria were consecutively included. On RX, a modified Sharp erosion score (SHSe) was evaluated by two blinded readers and one adjudicator for discordant cases (number of eroded joints ≤ three). On US, erosions were scored on six bilateral joints (MCP2, 3, 5; MTP2, 3, 5) with a four-point scale to calculate the total US score for erosions (USSe). The mean total SHSe and USSe were 3.7 and 4.4 times higher in the ACPA+ group than in the ACPA- group, respectively (P < 0.001). On both RX and US, the most discriminating joint between the two groups was MTP5, especially in cases with bilateral erosion. Based on multivariate analyses, ACPA + status was associated with erosive RA on RX according to the EULAR 2013 definition criteria [OR 4.4 (95% CI 1.2-16.4)], and on US according to the following two definitions: the presence of at least two eroded joint facets [OR 3.7 (95% CI 1.4-9.9)] or at least one grade 2 joint facet erosion [OR 9.0 (95% CI 2.8-28.4)]. Compared to ACPA- RA, ACPA + RA is associated independently with more severe erosive disease on RX and US. Both US and RX bilateral erosions in MTP5 joints are highly discriminant for ACPA + RA patients (97.8% in US and 100% in RX).Entities:
Keywords: ACPA; Bone erosion; Erosive disease; Radiography; Rheumatoid arthritis; Ultrasonography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31834475 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-019-04492-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rheumatol Int ISSN: 0172-8172 Impact factor: 2.631