Literature DB >> 31833634

Unfair Advantages for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Listed for Liver Transplant in Short-Wait Regions Following 2015 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Policy Change.

Max N Brondfield1, Jennifer L Dodge2, Ryutaro Hirose2, Julie Heimbach3, Francis Y Yao2,4, Neil Mehta4.   

Abstract

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) listed for liver transplantation (LT), United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) enacted policy changes in 2015 to improve equity between HCC and non-HCC patients. We evaluated the impact of these changes on regional disparities in wait-list dropout and LT. We included patients in the UNOS database listed with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease HCC exceptions in long-wait regions (LWRs), mid-wait regions (MWRs), and short-wait regions (SWRs) before these policy changes (era 1, January 1 to December 31, 2013) and after (era 2, October 7, 2015, to October 7, 2016). Cumulative incidence of wait-list dropout and LT were evaluated using competing risk regression. Median time to LT increased by 3.6 months (3.1 to 6.7 months) in SWRs and 1.3 months (6.9 to 8.2 months) in MWRs (P < 0.001), with a slight decrease in LWRs (13.4 to 12.9 months; P = 0.02). The 2-year cumulative incidence of dropout increased from 9.7% to 14.8% in SWRs (P = 0.03) and from 18.9% to 22.6% in MWRs (P = 0.18) but decreased in LWRs from 26.7% to 24.8% (P = 0.31). Factors predicting wait-list dropout included listing in era 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17), in LWRs (HR, 2.56), and in MWRs (HR, 1.91). Regional differences in wait-list outcomes decreased with policy changes, but HCC patients in SWRs remain advantaged. Recent policy change may narrow these disparities.
Copyright © 2020 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31833634      PMCID: PMC8751234          DOI: 10.1002/lt.25701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  16 in total

1.  Impact of geographic disparity on liver allocation for hepatocellular cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Zakiyah Kadry; Eric W Schaefer; Tadahiro Uemura; Ali Riaz Shah; Ian Schreibman; Thomas R Riley
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Priority of candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation can be reduced after successful bridge therapy.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Cescon; Eleonora Bigonzi; Fabio Piscaglia; Rita Golfieri; Giorgio Ercolani; Maria Cristina Morelli; Matteo Ravaioli; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Benjamin French; Peter Abt; Sandy Feng; Andrew M Cameron
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Ryutaro Hirose; Peter G Stock; David P Schladt; Hui Xiong; Jiannong Liu; Kim M Olthoff; Ann Harper; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system.

Authors:  K Washburn; E Edwards; A Harper; R Freeman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change.

Authors:  Tanveen Ishaque; Allan B Massie; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Jessica M Ruck; Samantha E Halpern; Madeleine M Waldram; Macey L Henderson; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Andrew M Cameron; Benjamin Philosophe; Shane Ottmann; Anne F Rositch; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  MELD Exceptions and Rates of Waiting List Outcomes.

Authors:  A B Massie; B Caffo; S E Gentry; E C Hall; D A Axelrod; K L Lentine; M A Schnitzler; A Gheorghian; P R Salvalaggio; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Identification of liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma and a very low dropout risk: implications for the current organ allocation policy.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; Aparna Goel; John Paul Roberts; Ryutaro Hirose; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 9.  Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population.

Authors:  Sahil Mittal; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the U.S.

Authors:  Robert J Wong; Ramsey Cheung; Aijaz Ahmed
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shorter Height Is Associated With Lower Probability of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric Lee; Monika Sarkar; Jennifer Dodge; Maureen Kohi; Neil Mehta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  The Impact of Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease at Transplant Minus 3 National Policy on Waitlist Outcomes in Patients With and Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah Bernards; Ryutaro Hirose; Francis Y Yao; Chengshi Jin; Jennifer L Dodge; Chiung-Yu Huang; Neil Mehta
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 5.799

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.