| Literature DB >> 31833222 |
De-Hong Wu1,2, Xiao-Wen Zhu1, Xiang-Mei Wen3,4, Ying-Ying Zhang1, Ji-Chun Ma3,4, Dong-Ming Yao3,4, Jing-Dong Zhou1, Hong Guo3,4, Peng-Fei Wu2, Xing-Li Zhang2, Hong-Chun Qiu2, Jiang Lin3,4, Jun Qian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have disclosed up-regulation of MIR-378 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and might consequently affect the outcome of the patients. Correspondingly, hypomethylation of MIR-378 was also identified in AML, particularly for FAB-M2 subtype with t(8;21) chromosomal translocation. Nevertheless, the methylation status of MIR-378 has not been illustrated in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Herein we designed to understand the methylation pattern of MIR-378 involved in MDS and clinical interrelation thereof.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990MIR-378zzm321990; hypomethylation; myelodysplastic syndrome; prognosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31833222 PMCID: PMC6978398 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Correlation of MIR‐378 hypomethylation with clinical features in MDS
| Clinical parameters |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( | Total ( |
| |
| Age (years) | 60 (20–86) | 63.5 (27–85) | 60 (20–86) | .560 |
| Sex (male/female) | 39/36 | 16/4 | 55/40 | .040 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 2.8 (0.9–26.6) | 2.4 (1.3–19.5) | 2.7 (0.9–26.6) | .204 |
| HB (g/L) | 68 (26–128) | 58 (29–104) | 63.5 (26–118) | .088 |
| PLT (×109/L) | 63 (0–754) | 60 (9–1176) | 61.5 (0–1176) | .964 |
| Cytogenetics | .607 | |||
| Good | 54 | 15 | 69 | |
| Intermediate | 9 | 1 | 10 | |
| Poor | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| No data | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| WHO classifications | .486 | |||
| RARS | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| RCMD (RS) | 32 | 5 | 37 | |
| 5q‐ | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| RAEB‐1 | 16 | 4 | 20 | |
| RAEB‐2 | 16 | 7 | 23 | |
| MDS‐U | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| FAB classifications | .222 | |||
| RA | 32 | 7 | 39 | |
| RARS | 15 | 2 | 17 | |
| RAEB | 26 | 11 | 37 | |
| RAEBt | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| IPSS | .541 | |||
| Low | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Int‐1 | 45 | 9 | 54 | |
| Int‐2 | 13 | 4 | 17 | |
| High | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
| No data | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Gene mutations | ||||
| U2AF1 (+/−) | 5/66 | 2/15 | 7/81 | .616 |
| IDH1/2 (+/−) | 4/68 | 0/17 | 4/85 | 1.000 |
| DNMT3A (+/−) | 2/70 | 1/16 | 3/86 | .475 |
| SF3B1 (+/−) | 5/66 | 1/16 | 6/82 | 1.000 |
Abbreviations: FAB, French‐American‐British; HB, hemoglobin; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; PLT, platelet count; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, RA with excess of blasts; RARS, RA with ringed sideroblasts; RCMD, refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia; RCMD‐RS, RCMD with ringed sideroblasts; WBC, white blood cells; WHO, World Health Organization.
Median (range).
The sequences of primers used in RQ‐MSP and BSP
| Forward (5’→3’) | Reverse (5’→3’) | Product (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RQ‐MSP | |||
| M | GGATGAGTTTTGAGTCGTTT | CCATACAAACCGCTCACTCC | 129 |
| U | TAGGATGAGTTTTGAGTTGT | ATAATCCCATACAAACCACT | 137 |
| BSP | AGGATTTTTTGGTGATTTTTG | TCACCCTCTAACTACATAATCCC | 200 |
Abbreviations: BSP, bisulfite‐sequencing PCR; RQ‐MSP, real‐time quantitative methylation‐specific PCR.
Figure 1Relative Levels of MIR‐378 unmethylation in MDS and control. The cutoff value of the mean plus 1 SD (0.252) in normal controls was displayed with the dotted line. MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome
Figure 2Electrophoresis results of RQ‐MSP products in MDS patients. (a) MIR‐378 methylation; (b) MIR‐378 unmethylation; (c) ALU. 1: Gene Ruler™ 100bp DNA ladder; 2–3: normal controls; 4–10: MDS samples; 11: cloned plasmid; 12: negative control. MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; RQ‐MSP, real‐time quantitative methylation‐specific PCR
Figure 3The CpG site of MIR‐378 5’‐flanking region and methylation density of MIR‐378 5’‐flanking region identified in three hypomethylated and three hypermethylated MDS patients by bisulfite sequencing. (A) diagrammatic sketches of the CpG site of MIR‐378 5’‐flanking region. The vertical lines represent the cytosine resides of CpGs. The black and gray arrows indicate the locations of the primers for BSP and RQ‐MSP respectively. (B) methylation density. Black lollipop: methylated CpG dinucleotide; Blank lollipop: unmethylated CpG dinucleotide. (a–c) Three hypomethylated samples; (d–f) three hypermethylated samples. The results of RQ‐MSP and bisulfite‐sequencing were significantly negative correlated (R = −.886, p = .019). BSP, bisulfite‐sequencing PCR; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; RQ‐MSP, real‐time quantitative methylation‐specific PCR
Figure 4Overall survival of MDS patients. (a) All patients; (b) MDS patients <60 years. MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome
Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival in MDS patients
| OS multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Sex | 0.385 | 0.189–0.786 | .009 |
| IPSS stratification | 1.525 | 1.076–2.161 | .018 |
|
| 1.709 | 0.830–3.519 | .146 |
|
| 7.827 | 0.685–89.402 | .098 |
|
| 2.530 | 0.758–8.443 | .131 |
|
| 1.410 | 0.364–5.456 | .619 |
|
| 3.240 | 0.898–11.693 | .073 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidential interval; HR, hazard ratio; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; OS, overall survival.
HR >1 indicates an increased risk of an event for the first category listed.
Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival in young (age <60 years) MDS patients
| OS multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Sex | 1.664 | 0.398–6.954 | .485 |
| IPSS stratification | 4.181 | 1.908–9.159 | .000 |
|
| 6.619 | 1.694–25.864 | .007 |
|
| 7.827 | 0.685–89.402 | .098 |
|
| 17.391 | 1.551–194.943 | .021 |
|
| 1.410 | 0.364–5.456 | .619 |
|
| 31.725 | 2.604–386.451 | .007 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidential interval; HR, hazard ratio; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; OS, overall survival.
HR >1 indicates an increased risk of an event for the first category listed.