Literature DB >> 32648527

Injecting Information into the Mammalian Cortex: Progress, Challenges, and Promise.

Kevin A Mazurek1,2, Marc H Schieber1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

For 150 years artificial stimulation has been used to study the function of the nervous system. Such stimulation-whether electrical or optogenetic-eventually may be used in neuroprosthetic devices to replace lost sensory inputs and to otherwise introduce information into the nervous system. Efforts toward this goal can be classified broadly as either biomimetic or arbitrary. Biomimetic stimulation aims to mimic patterns of natural neural activity, so that the subject immediately experiences the artificial stimulation as if it were natural sensation. Arbitrary stimulation, in contrast, makes no attempt to mimic natural patterns of neural activity. Instead, different stimuli-at different locations and/or in different patterns-are assigned different meanings randomly. The subject's time and effort then are required to learn to interpret different stimuli, a process that engages the brain's inherent plasticity. Here we will examine progress in using artificial stimulation to inject information into the cerebral cortex and discuss the challenges for and the promise of future development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral cortex; electrical stimulation; intracortical microstimulation; perception; sensation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648527      PMCID: PMC7995349          DOI: 10.1177/1073858420936253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscientist        ISSN: 1073-8584            Impact factor:   7.519


  96 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited.

Authors:  G Bi ; M Poo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  A model for intracortical visual prosthesis research.

Authors:  Philip Troyk; Martin Bak; Joshua Berg; David Bradley; Stuart Cogan; Robert Erickson; Conrad Kufta; Douglas McCreery; Edward Schmidt; Vernon Towle
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study.

Authors:  G di Pellegrino; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mapping by microstimulation of overlapping projections from area 4 to motor units of the baboon's hand.

Authors:  P Andersen; P J Hagan; C G Phillips; T P Powell
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1975-01-21

Review 5.  A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation.

Authors:  Roger A Nicoll
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Restoration of vision in blind individuals using bionic devices: a review with a focus on cortical visual prostheses.

Authors:  Philip M Lewis; Helen M Ackland; Arthur J Lowery; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in primate corticospinal connections induced during free behavior.

Authors:  Yukio Nishimura; Steve I Perlmutter; Ryan W Eaton; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Rewiring neural interactions by micro-stimulation.

Authors:  James M Rebesco; Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Körding; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-23

9.  A learning-based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration.

Authors:  Maria C Dadarlat; Joseph E O'Doherty; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice.

Authors:  Daniel Huber; Leopoldo Petreanu; Nima Ghitani; Sachin Ranade; Tomás Hromádka; Zach Mainen; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.