| Literature DB >> 31831784 |
Genesio M Karere1,2, Michael C Mahaney3, Deborah E Newman4,5, Angelica M Riojas6, Clint Christensen5, Shifra Birnbaum5, John L VandeBerg3, Laura Cox6,4,5.
Abstract
Reported associations between leukocyte telomere length (LTL) attrition, diet and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are inconsistent. This study explores effects of prolonged exposure to a high cholesterol high fat (HCHF) diet on LTL in a baboon model of atherosclerosis. We measured LTL by qPCR in pedigreed baboons fed a chow (n = 105) or HCHF (n = 106) diet for 2 years, tested for effects of diet on LTL, and association between CVD risk factors and atherosclerotic lesions with LTL. Though not different at baseline, after 2 years median LTL is shorter in HCHF fed baboons (P < 0.0001). Diet predicts sex- and age-adjusted LTL and LTL attrition (P = 0.0009 and 0.0156, respectively). Serum concentrations of CVD biomarkers are associated with LTL at the 2-year endpoint and LTL accounts approximately 6% of the variance in aortic lesions (P = 0.04). Although heritable at baseline (h2 = 0.27, P = 0.027) and after 2 years (h2 = 0.46, P = 0.0038), baseline LTL does not predict lesion extent after 2 years. Atherogenic diet influences LTL, and LTL is a potential biomarker for early atherosclerosis. Prolonged exposure to an atherogenic diet decreases LTL and increases LTL attrition, and shortened LTL is associated with early-stage atherosclerosis in pedigreed baboons.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31831784 PMCID: PMC6908639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55348-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Adjusted standard curves for measurements of (left) baboon leukocyte telomere length, (right) single copy gene (baboon endothelial lipase, LIPG).
Telomere-to-Single Copy Gene (T/S) Ratios in Pedigreed Baboons: Descriptive Statistics.
| T/S Ratio | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | Total | Females | Males | Total | |
| Mean | 1.07 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| Median | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.90 |
| SD | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Minimum | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Maximum | 1.59 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.75 | 1.56 | 1.75 |
| Range | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.82 | 0.91 |
| Mean | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Median | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.86 |
| SD | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Minimum | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Maximum | 1.47 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.16 |
| Range | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.42 |
Mean effects of sex, age, and diet and additive effects of genes on LTL in pedigreed baboons at two timepoints: Cohorts combined.
| Baseline | Baseline + 2 years | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | MLE ± S.e. | P | MLE ± s.e. | P |
| βsex | 0.516 ± 0.141 | 0.0003 | 0.218 ± 0.169 | 0.2975 |
| βage | −0.089 ± 0.040 | 0.0274 | −0.048 ± 0.031 | 0.1976 |
| βdiet | N/A | N/A | −0.486 ± 0.143 | 0.0009 |
| h2 | 0.270 ± 0.128 | 0.0266 | 0.457 ± 0.242 | 0.0038 |
Baseline: diet is LCLF for both; Baseline + 2 years: Control group fed LCLF diet and experimental group fed HCHF atherogenic challenge diet for 2 years.
MLE ± s.e.: maximum likelihood estimates of parameters and their standard errors.
P: Probability a parameter estimate equals zero (by likelihood ratio test).
Sex: A dichotomous (0, 1) variable. Estimate of mean effect of being female.
Age: Continuous variable (decimal years).
Diet: Dichotomous variable (0, 1). Estimate of mean effect of HCHF diet.
h2: Heritability or proportion of residual phenotypic variance in the phenotype due to the additive effects of genes.
Correlations: LTL and biomarkers of lipid metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress by time on HCHF diet.
| Trait | Baseline | Baseline + 7 weeks | Baseline + 2 years | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | r | P(r = 0) | R2 | r | P(r = 0) | R2 | r | P(r = 0) | |
| HDLC | 0.0164 | 0.090 | 0.373 | 0.008 | 0.089 | 0.378 | 0.010 | 0.102 | 0.313 |
| V + LDLC | 0.0260 | −0.160 | 0.112 | 0.058 | −0.241 | 0.015 | 0.005 | −0.069 | 0.498 |
| TG | 0.0020 | −0.040 | 0.693 | 0.016 | 0.126 | 0.212 | 0.002 | −0.048 | 0.635 |
| apo A1 | 0.0037 | 0.192 | 0.055 | 0.002 | 0.045 | 0.657 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.976 |
| apo B | 0.0049 | 0.070 | 0.488 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.843 | 0.001 | 0.030 | 0.767 |
| apo E | 0.00008 | 0.009 | 0.929 | 0.046 | −0.214 | 0.032 | 0.002 | −0.046 | 0.649 |
| CRP | 0.0002 | 0.013 | 0.897 | 0.015 | 0.122 | 0.226 | 0.004 | −0.062 | 0.540 |
| oxLDL | 0.0044 | −0.066 | 0.514 | 0.012 | 0.110 | 0.272 | 0.0003 | 0.018 | 0.859 |
| IL8 | 0.0060 | −0.077 | 0.446 | 0.002 | 0.045 | 0.667 | 0.010 | −0.101 | 0.317 |
| LpPLA2 | 0.0034 | 0.058 | 0.567 | 0.012 | 0.110 | 0.276 | 0.004 | −0.061 | 0.547 |
| PON1 | 0.0163 | 0.127 | 0.207 | 0.045 | 0.212 | 0.035 | 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.707 |
| TAS | 0.0106 | 0.103 | 0.378 | 0.050 | 0.224 | 0.025 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.400 |
| VWF | 0.0005 | 0.023 | 0.820 | 0.014 | 0.118 | 0.242 | 0.001 | 0.027 | 0.790 |
Abbreviations: For traits, TSC: total serum cholesterol, HDLC: high density lipoprotein cholesterol, V + LDLC: very low + low density lipoprotein cholesterol (V + LDLC), TG: triglycerides, apo A1: apolipoprotein A1, apo B: apolipoprotein B, apo E: apolipoprotein E, CRP: C-reactive protein, IL8: interleukin 8, LpPLA2: lipoprotein associated phospholipase 2 activity, PON1: paraoxonase 1 activity, TAS: total antioxidant status, and VWF: von Willebrand factor. For table column headers, R2: proportion of the variance in LTL attributable to the biomarker; correlation between the biomarker and LTL; P(r = 0): probability that the correlation between the biomarker and LTL equals zero, which is equal the probability that mean effect of the biomarker (β) on LTL equals zero in the model.
Correlations between LTL and extent of atherosclerotic lesions at three sites.
| Trait | R2 | r | P(r = 0) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aortic arch | 0.0157 | −0.125 | 0.201 |
| Common iliac artery | 0.0027 | −0.052 | 0.596 |
| Descending aorta | 0.0609 | −0.247 | 0.010 |
| Sum of lesion extent at three sites | 0.0219 | −0.148 | 0.130 |
| Mean lesion extent at three sites | 0.0220 | −0.148 | 0.130 |
R2: proportion of the variance in lesion extent attributable to LTL; correlation between LTL and lesion extent; P(r = 0): probability that the correlation between LTL on extent of lesion (r) equals zero, which is equivalent to the probability that the mean effect LTL (β) on lesion extent equals zero in the model.
Correlations between ΔLTL and extent of atherosclerotic lesions at three sites.
| Trait | R2 | r | P(r = 0) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aortic arch | 0.0034 | −0.059 | 0.595 |
| Common iliac artery | 0.0408 | −0.202 | 0.036 |
| Descending aorta | 0.0190 | −0.137 | 0.170 |
| Sum of lesion extent at three sites | 0.0114 | −0.106 | 0.279 |
| Mean lesion extent at three sites | 0.0114 | −0.109 | 0.266 |
R2: proportion of the variance in lesion extent attributable to ΔLTL; correlation between ΔLTL and lesion extent; P(r = 0): probability that the correlation between ΔLTL on extent of lesion (r) equals zero, which is equivalent to the probability that the mean effect of ΔLTL (β) on lesion extent equals zero in the model.