Copper-catalyzed enantioselective Sonogashira-type oxidative cross-coupling of unactivated C(sp3)-H bonds with alkynes.

Transition metal-catalyzed enantioselective Sonogashira-type oxidative C(sp3)-C(sp) coupling of unactivated C(sp3)-H bonds with terminal alkynes has remained a prominent challenge. The difficulties mainly stem from the regiocontrol in unactivated C(sp3)-H bond functionalization and the inhibition of readily occurring Glaser homocoupling of terminal alkynes. Here, we report a copper/chiral cinchona alkaloid-based N,N,P-ligand catalyst for asymmetric oxidative cross-coupling of unactivated C(sp3)-H bonds with terminal alkynes in a highly regio-, chemo-, and enantioselective manner. The use of N-fluoroamide as a mild oxidant is essential to site-selectively generate alkyl radical species while efficiently avoiding Glaser homocoupling. This reaction accommodates a range of (hetero)aryl and alkyl alkynes; (hetero)benzylic and propargylic C(sp3)-H bonds are all applicable. This process allows expedient access to chiral alkynyl amides/aldehydes. More importantly, it also provides a versatile tool for the construction of chiral C(sp3)-C(sp), C(sp3)-C(sp2), and C(sp3)-C(sp3) bonds when allied with follow-up transformations.

Introduction

As one of the most fundamental motifs in organic chemistry, chiral class="Chemical">alkynes play an essential role in biology, medicinal chemistry, and material science[1,2]. They also serve as vital synthetic precursors for many functionalities such as <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">alkanes, alkenes, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, and heterocycles on both laboratory and industrial scales[1,2]. Accordingly, a variety of catalytic methods have been developed to enantioselectively deliver chiral C(sp3)—C(sp) bonds[3-13]. From the viewpoint of step- and atom-economy, a direct enantioselective alkynylation of a C(sp3)−H bond would be highly appealing[14-16]. Thus, directed palladium-catalyzed C−H activation has been shown to be an effective strategy for C(sp3)−H alkynylation[17-19]. However, only a few enantioselective examples have been disclosed with the expensive alkynyl bromide/iodine as the alkynylation reagents[16,20-22]. In comparison, an enantioselective Sonogashira-type cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) of C(sp3)−H bonds with low-cost terminal alkynes would be more ideal due to the ready availability of both coupling partners. In this respect, Li and others have pioneered in establishing enantioselective alkynylation of C(sp3)−H bonds adjacent to nitrogen with terminal alkynes[23-32]. The stereochemical control was elegantly implemented via chiral Lewis acid-catalyzed nucleophilic addition to the in situ generated iminium ions (Fig. 1a)[23-32]. However, the enantioselective oxidative cross-coupling of common unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds poses a significant challenge to this strategy. Two major difficulties have to be overcome: (1) The site-selective generation of carbocation species from such unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds is relatively difficult compared with that adjacent to nitrogen. (2) The chemo- and enantiocontrol of the non-heteroatom-stabilized carbocations are also more challenging due to their inherently high reactivity. Clearly, a conceptually different approach is highly desirable to achieve the enantioselective oxidative cross-coupling of unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds and terminal alkynes.

Fig. 1

Sonogashira-type enantioselective oxidative cross-coupling of C(sp3)−H bonds with terminal alkynes.

a Previous ionic-type dehydrogenative coupling of C(sp3)—H bonds adjacent to nitrogen. b Our proposal: tandem HAA and copper-catalyzed Sonogashira-type coupling. c Amide-directed enantioselective coupling of C(sp3)−H bonds with terminal alkynes. HAA hydrogen atom abstraction, [ox] oxidant, SET single-electron transfer.

a Previous ionic-type declass="Chemical">hydrogenative coupling of <class="Chemical">span class="Species">C(sp3)—H bonds adjacent to nitrogen. b Our proposal: tandem HAA and copper-catalyzed Sonogashira-type coupling. c Amide-directed enantioselective coupling of C(sp3)−H bonds with terminal alkynes. HAA hydrogen atom abstraction, [ox] oxidant, SET single-electron transfer.

Enantioselective class="Species">C(sp3)−H bond functionalization by merging a site-selective <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">hydrogen atom abstraction (HAA) process with asymmetric copper-catalyzed cross-coupling has received much attention over the past several years[33-42]. At the same time, we have recently developed a copper/cinchona alkaloid-based N,N-ligand catalyst, which could intimately associate with alkyl radical species for realization of asymmetric alkene difunctionalization[43-46]. Inspired by these works, we wondered if this catalyst system would be also suitable for tandem site-selective HAA on unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds and enantioselective coupling with terminal alkynes (Fig. 1b). However, common oxidants for HAA readily lead to copper-catalyzed Glaser homocoupling of terminal alkynes[47,48]. To this end, we have been encouraged by the mild oxidation power of N-halogenated amides employed in recent remote C(sp3)−H functionalization transformations[49-59] based on the classic Hofmann–Löffler–Freytag[60,61] and Barton[62] reactions. More importantly, the corresponding amidyl radicals[49-51] commonly exhibit robust HAA reactivity and site-selectivity. Thus, we questioned if a removable directing amide group would be viable for sequential N-oxidation and asymmetric copper-catalyzed Sonogashira-type coupling of unactivated C−H bonds with terminal alkynes.

Herein, we describe our efforts toward the development of radical asymmetric oxidative cross-coupling of unactivated class="Species">C(sp3)−H bonds with terminal <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">alkynes enabled by copper(I)/cinchona alkaloid-based N,N,P-ligand catalysis. Notably, this protocol not only provides a range of chiral alkynyl amides and alkynyl aldehydes (Fig. 1c) but also, together with further transformations, offers a general way for chiral C(sp3)–C(sp), C(sp3)–C(sp2), and C(sp3)–C(sp3) bond construction.

Results

Reaction optimization

To verify our hypothesis, class="Chemical">N-halo-amides 1aa and 1ab as well as <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">O-acylhydroxylamide 1ac were prepared, which all can generate the amidyl radical via single-electron reduction by a Cu(I) catalyst[54,56]. Initial treatment of N-fluoroamide 1aa with phenylacetylene 2a and Cs2CO3 in the presence of CuI and our designed bidentate quinine-derived sulfonamide ligands[43] L1 and L2 did not provide any products (entries 1 and 2, Table 1). We tentatively ascribed the results to the insufficient reducing capability of Cu(I) catalysts. Thus, we speculated that an additional coordinative amine or phosphine moieties on the ligands might help increase the electron-density on copper and enhance its reducing power. As such, cinchona alkaloid-derived Nakamura’s tridentate N,N,N-ligand[63] L3 and Dixon’s N,N,P-ligand[64] L5 as well as their analogs L4 and L6, respectively, were examined. And most of them led to the desired product 3a with promising enantioselectivity (entries 3–6, Table 1). In contrast, N-chloroamide 1ab and O-acylhydroxylamide 1ac only afforded Glaser homocoupling product 3a′ (entries 7 and 8, Table 1) under such reaction conditions, indicating the importance of the chosen amidyl radical precursor. Further screening of Cu(I) catalysts and solvents (entries 9–15, Table 1) proved that CuI in Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was the best (88% yield and 94% ee; entry 12, Table 1). An evaluation of base indicated significant impacts on the efficiency and selectivity (entries 16–18, Table 1) and Cs2CO3 was found to be particularly effective to inhibit the formation of side product 3a″. Lowering the catalyst loading affected the yield but not the enantioselectivity (entries 19 and 20, Table 1). Control experiments showed that both the N,N,P-ligand and the alkyne were necessary for efficient amide consumption (entries 21–23, Table 1). Thus, both of them are required for the copper center to efficiently reduce the mild N–F oxidant.

Table 1

Screening of reaction conditionsa.

Entry	1	[Cu]	Base	L*	Solvent	Yield (%, 3a, 3a′, 3a″)b	Ee (%)c
1	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L1	Dichloromethane (DCM)	–d, 0, 0	–
2	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L2	DCM	–d, 0, 0	–
3	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L3	DCM	<5, 0, 0	6
4	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L4	DCM	8, 0, 0	74
5	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	DCM	53, 0, –d	68
6	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L6	DCM	15, 0, 0	51
7	1ab	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	DCM	–d, 48, 0	–
8	1ac	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	DCM	0, 0, –d	–
9	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	1,2-Dichloroethane	50, 0, –d	76
10	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	Benzene	77, 0, 5	64
11	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	EtOAc	92, 0, 0	91
12	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	88, 0, 0	94
13	1aa	CuBr	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	64, 0, 0	93
14	1aa	CuTc	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	91, 0, 0	92
15	1aa	CuOAc	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	80, 0, 0,	94
16	1aa	CuI	Na2CO3	L5	THF	<5, 0, 81	85
17	1aa	CuI	K2CO3	L5	THF	27, 0, 62	93
18	1aa	CuI	KOtBu	L5	THF	71, 0, 26	93
19e	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	66, 0, 0	94
20f	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	31, 0, 0	92
21	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	–	THF	0, 0, 0	–
22g	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	–	THF	0, 0, 0	–
23g	1aa	CuI	Cs2CO3	L5	THF	0, 0, 0	–

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), [Cu] (10 mol%), L* (10 mol%), and base (0.1 mmol) in dry solvent (1.2 mL) at room temperature (rt) for 16 h

bYield based on 1H NMR analysis of the crude product using CH2Br2 as an internal standard

cEe values based on HPLC analysis

dA trace amount of product

eCuI (5  mol%), L* (5  mol%) for 24  h

fCuI (2  mol%), L* (2  mol%) for 36  h

gWithout 2a

bYield based on <span class="Chemical">1H NMR analysis of the crude product using <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">CH2Br2 as an internal standard

<span class="Chemical">fCuI (2  mol%), L* (2  mol%) for 36  h

Substrate scope

With the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of class="Chemical">alkynes was next explored (Fig. 2). A series of <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">aryl alkynes, including those having electron-donating or -withdrawing groups at different positions (ortho, meta, or para) of phenyl rings, reacted smoothly to afford 3a–3p in 62–98% yield with 87–94% ee. Many functional groups, such as methoxyl (3b), halo (3d–3i), trifluoromethyl (3j), cyano (3k), formyl (3l and 3m), methoxylcarbonyl (3n), pinacolborato (3o), and terminal alkynyl (3p), were all compatible with the reaction conditions. Furthermore, a range of heteroaryl alkynes, such as 3-pyridinyl, 2-thiophenyl, and 3-thiophenyl, all worked well to deliver 3q–3s in good yields with excellent enantioselectivity. We were especially pleased to find that alkyl alkynes were also competent coupling partners. For example, the aliphatic alkynes underwent the reaction to give 3t and 3u with good results in the presence of 2 equivalents of Cs2CO3. A wide range of functional groups, such as conjugating alkenyl (3v and 3w), cyclopropanyl (3x), acetal (3y), carbazole (3z), cyano (3za), primary chloride (3zb), ester (3zc), and even hydroxy (3zd) groups, at different distances away from the reacting alkynes were well tolerated, therefore giving products in excellent enantioselectivity. In addition, a silyl alkyne was also applicable to provide 3ze in 78% yield with 97% ee.

Fig. 2

Substrate scope of alkynes.

Standard conditions: 1aa (0.2 mmol), alkyne (0.4 mmol), CuI (10 mol%), L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv.) in THF (2.4 mL) at rt for 16 h. Isolated yield based on 1aa is given. Ee values are based on HPLC analysis. aCuTc (15 mol%), L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv.) in THF at rt for 24 h. Bpin pinacolborato, TMS trimethylsilyl.

Standard conditions: 1aa (0.2 mmol), class="Chemical">alkyne (0.4 mmol), CuI (10 mol%), <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv.) in THF (2.4 mL) at rt for 16 h. Isolated yield based on 1aa is given. Ee values are based on HPLC analysis. aCuTc (15 mol%), L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (2.0 equiv.) in THF at rt for 24 h. Bpin pinacolborato, TMS trimethylsilyl.

The scope of class="Chemical">N-fluorocarboxamides bearing secondary benzylic <class="Chemical">span class="Species">C(sp3)−H bonds was next evaluated (Fig. 3a). Simple alkyl-substituted substrates worked well to give alkynylation products 3zf–3zh with excellent regio- and enantioselectivity. Noteworthy is that a terminal alkenyl group was tolerated under the reaction conditions to provide 3zi in 78% yield with 96% ee. A range of electron-donating or -withdrawing substituents at different positions of the backbone phenyl rings were well accommodated to deliver 3zj–3zn in 55–85% yield with 90–93% ee. In addition, direct alkynylation of the α-C−H bond of a thiophene heterocycle also proceeded smoothly to give 3zo in 69% yield with 88% ee. The N-tBu group could be replaced with another tertiary alkyl group without any interferences on either yield or enantioselectivity (3zp). The above method could also be extended to more remote benzylic C−H bonds via a 1,6-HAA[56,65-67] process to give alkynylated amide 3zq in 69% yield with 89% ee.

Fig. 3

Substrate scope of N-fluorocarboxamides.

a The reaction is compatible with a variety of (hetero)aryl-fused N-fluorocarboxamide substrates. b Linear N-fluorocarboxamides are also applicable under slightly modified conditions. aStandard conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), alkyne (0.4 mmol), CuI (10 mol%), L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv.) in THF (2.4 mL) at rt for 16 h. bIsolated yield based on 1. cEe values based on HPLC analysis. dL6 (10 mol%) was used in DCM at rt for 24 h. eL7 (Table 1, 10 mol%) was used in CHCl3 at rt for 24 h.

a The reaction is compatible with a variety of (hetero)aryl-fused class="Chemical">N-fluorocarboxamide substrates. b Linear <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">N-fluorocarboxamides are also applicable under slightly modified conditions. aStandard conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), alkyne (0.4 mmol), CuI (10 mol%), L5 (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (1.0 equiv.) in THF (2.4 mL) at rt for 16 h. bIsolated yield based on 1. cEe values based on HPLC analysis. dL6 (10 mol%) was used in DCM at rt for 24 h. eL7 (Table 1, 10 mol%) was used in CHCl3 at rt for 24 h.

To further test the compatibility of the reaction in more structurally diverse contexts, an class="Chemical">N-benzoylated amine with a tethered phenyl ring was evaluated and the desired product 3zr was obtained in 72% yield and 91% ee (Fig. 3b). Noteworthy is that the reaction is not restricted to benzylic or heterobenzylic <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">C(sp)–H bond functionalization. For example, various propargylic C(sp)–H bonds were amenable to this transformation, therefore providing 3zs−3zu in moderate to high enantioselectivity. Interestingly, a substrate containing only simple alkyl δ-C−H bonds also underwent the reaction to deliver 3zv in excellent regioselectivity, albeit with no enantioselectivity. The reaction is currently under further optimization for potential enantiocontrol in our laboratory.

Straightforward transformation

One feature of this strategy is the requirement for an class="Chemical">amide directing group. In fact, the <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">amide group in product 3a was readily removed by sequential treatment with the Schwartz’s reagent and the Wilkinson’s catalyst in two steps (Fig. 4a). In this sense, this protocol provides an indirect approach for enantioselective Sonogashira-type oxidative coupling. The absolute configuration of 5 was determined to be R by comparing its HPLC spectrum and optical rotation with those reported in literature[68,69]. Another feature of this protocol is the reactive alkyne moieties in products, which could be readily converted to a Z-alkene group in 6 and a saturated alkyl group in 7 upon hydrogenation to different extents (Fig. 4b), respectively. Therefore, it provides a versatile and complementary tool to other direct methods for the construction of chiral C(sp3)–C(sp2) and C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds. In addition, the TMS group in 3ze could be straightforwardly unmasked to provide the chiral terminal alkyne 8 in 86% yield without any loss of enantioselectivity (Fig. 4c). Such enantioenriched terminal alkynes are valuable chiral building blocks for a range of transformations.

Fig. 4

Straightforward transformation.

a The directing amide group was readily removed by sequential amide reduction to aldehyde and decarbonylation. b The essential alkyne moiety in the product was straightforwardly transformed into Z-alkene and alkane featuring chiral C(sp3)–C(sp2) and C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds. c Silyl alkyne was easily converted to terminal alkyne, thus providing valuable chiral building blocks.

a The directing class="Chemical">amide group was readily removed by sequential <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">amide reduction to aldehyde and decarbonylation. b The essential alkyne moiety in the product was straightforwardly transformed into Z-alkene and alkane featuring chiral C(sp3)–C(sp2) and C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds. c Silyl alkyne was easily converted to terminal alkyne, thus providing valuable chiral building blocks.

Mechanism investigation

To gain some insight into the reaction mechanism, control experiments with radical inhibitors class="Chemical">2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (<class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">TEMPO) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were conducted, respectively, indicating reaction inhibition (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Moreover, a radical clock experiment showed that substrate 9 underwent a tandem cyclopropane ring-opening/alkyne trapping process to provide 10 in 72% yield with 74% ee (Fig. 5a). These observations support the possible formation of alkyl radical species from in situ-generated amidyl radical species via 1,5(6)-HAA processes. Deuterium-labeling experiments indicated an intramolecular kinetic isotope effect (KIE) value of 1.94 and an intermolecular KIE value of 1.16. Thus, the 1,5-HAA process might be not involved in the rate-determining step(s) (Supplementary Fig. 1b and 1c)[70]. In addition, only in the presence of L5 could copper phenylacetylide initiate the reaction (Fig. 5b). This result, together with the aforementioned effects of ligand and phenylacetylene for efficient amide consumption (entries 21–23, Table 1), demonstrates that the complex of copper phenylacetylide with the chiral ligand might be the initial complex to start this reaction.

Fig. 5

Mechanistic investigations.

a The radical-clock substrate (±)-9 underwent ring opening before the C–C bond formation, thus indicating the initial generation of a benzylic radical. b The reaction of 1aa with copper acetylide did not occur in the absence of L5, indicating that both chiral ligand and terminal alkyne are indispensable for reaction initiation. c The reaction was proposed to proceed through sequential single-electron reduction of substrate 1, 1,5(6)-HAA, and copper-catalyzed C(sp3)–C(sp) coupling.

a The radical-clock substrate (±)-9 underwent ring opening before the C–C bond formation, thus indicating the initial generation of a benzylic radical. b The reaction of 1aa with class="Chemical">copper acetylide did not occur in the absence of <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">L5, indicating that both chiral ligand and terminal alkyne are indispensable for reaction initiation. c The reaction was proposed to proceed through sequential single-electron reduction of substrate 1, 1,5(6)-HAA, and copper-catalyzed C(sp3)–C(sp) coupling.

On the basis of abovementioned observations and previous reports[38-46,52-59], a plausible mechanism was tentatively proposed, as shown in Fig. 5c. Initially, CuIX reacts with chiral ligand and terminal class="Chemical">alkyne in the presence of base, giving chiral <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">Cu(I) acetylide complex B. Subsequent single-electron transfer (SET) of B with N-fluorocarboxamide 1 results in the formation of Cu(II) acetylide complex C and the amidyl radical D. The amidyl radical then undergoes intramolecular 1,5(6)-HAA to generate alkyl radical species E. Next, C(sp3)–C(sp) coupling via reductive elimination of a Cu(III) intermediate F[33-42] gives rise to enantioenriched product 3 and chiral Cu(I) complex A.

Discussion

We have discovered class="Chemical">copper/<class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">cinchona alkaloid-based N,N,P-ligand catalysts to accomplish a radical asymmetric oxidative C(sp3)–C(sp) cross-coupling of unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds and terminal alkynes. The utilization of a removable amide group to direct the site-selective formation of alkyl radical species via a HAA process is crucial to the success of the transformation. In addition, the use of N-fluorocarboxamides as mild amidyl radical precursors is critical for inhibiting the Glaser homocoupling. Further, the strategic utilization of chiral cinchona alkaloid-derived N,N,P-ligands proved to be essential for eliciting the initial SET between copper and the mild N-fluorocarboxamides oxidant while imparting excellent enantiodiscrimination in the final C–C coupling step. This strategy allows for the facile assembly of chiral alkynyl amides/aldehydes and also provides a generally robust tool for the construction of chiral C(sp3)–C(sp), C(sp3)–C(sp2), and C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds. Further studies toward the development of direct enantioselective oxidative Sonogashira-type coupling of unactivated C(sp3)−H bonds with terminal alkynes are ongoing in our laboratory.

Methods

General procedure A

This procedure applies to compounds 3a–p, 3r, 3s, 3v, class="Chemical">3y–za, <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">3zc, 3zf–zq. Under argon atmosphere, an oven-dried resealable Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with CuI (3.8 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), L5 (12.2 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), Cs2CO3 (65.2 mg, 0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and anhydrous THF (2.4 mL). Then, N-fluorocarboxamide (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and alkyne (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were sequentially added into the mixture and the reaction mixture was stirred at (rt) for 16 h. Upon completion (monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC)), the precipitate was filtered off and washed by DCM. The filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired product.

General procedure B

This procedure applies to compounds 3q, 3t, 3u, 3w, 3x, class="Chemical">3zb, <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">3zd, 3ze. Under argon atmosphere, an oven-dried resealable Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with CuTc (5.7 mg, 0.030 mmol, 15 mol%), L5 (12.2 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), Cs2CO3 (130.4 mg, 0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), and anhydrous THF (2.4 mL). Then, N-fluorocarboxamide (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and alkyne (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were sequentially added into the mixture and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. Upon completion (monitored by TLC), the precipitate was filtered off and washed by DCM. The filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired product.

General procedure C

This procedure applies to compounds 3zr, 3zs, 3zu, 3v. Under class="Chemical">argon atmoclass="Chemical">sphere, an oven-dried resealable Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with CuI (3.8 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), L6 (16.7 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">Cs2CO3 (65.2 mg, 0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and anhydrous DCM (2.4 mL). Then, N-fluorocarboxamide (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and alkyne (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were sequentially added into the mixture and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. Upon completion (monitored by TLC), the precipitate was filtered off and washed by DCM. The filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired product.

General procedure D

This procedure applies to compound 3zt. Under class="Chemical">argon atmoclass="Chemical">sphere, an oven-dried resealable Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with CuI (3.8 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), L7 (13.9 mg, 0.020 mmol, 10 mol%), <class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">Cs2CO3 (65.2 mg, 0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and anhydrous chloroform (2.4 mL). Then, N-fluorocarboxamide (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and alkyne (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were sequentially added into the mixture and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. Upon completion (monitored by TLC), the precipitate was filtered off and washed by DCM. The filtrate was evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired product.

For nuclear magnetic resonance and high-performance liquid chromatography spectra, see Supplementary Figures.

Peer Review File