| Literature DB >> 31830092 |
Eliyas Tsegaye Sahle1,2, Jill Blumenthal3, Sonia Jain3, Shelly Sun3, Jason Young3, Tsegahun Manyazewal1,4, Habtamu Woldeamanuel1, Lemma Teferra5, Beniam Feleke6, Olivier Vandenberg7,8, Zilma Rey9, Melissa Briggs-Hagen9, Richard Haubrich10, Wondwossen Amogne1,4, John Allen McCutchan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) is a major health problem in prisons. Multiple studies of TB in regional Ethiopian prisons have assessed prevalence and risk factors but have not examined recently implemented screening programs for TB in prisons. This study compares bacteriologically-confirmed PTB (BC-PTB) prevalence in prison entrants versus residents and identifies risk factors for PTB in Kality prison, a large federal Ethiopian prison located in Addis Ababa, through a study of an enhanced TB screening program.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31830092 PMCID: PMC6907752 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Work flow for TB screening.
Socio-demographic characteristics of 13,803 study participants.
| Variable | Category | Value or n (%) (out of N = 13,803) |
|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | 26 (21–33) | |
| Male | 11,823 (85.7) | |
| Amhara | 5,341 (38.7) | |
| Oromo | 3,262 (23.6) | |
| Southern | 2,872 (20.8) | |
| Tigre | 1360 (9.9) | |
| Others | 968 (7.0) | |
| None | 1,564 (11.3) | |
| Elementary (0–8) | 5,891 (42.7) | |
| Secondary (9–10) | 3,253 (23.6) | |
| 3,095 (22.4) | ||
| Literate | 12,258 (88.8) | |
| Illiterate | 1,545 (11.2) | |
| Never Married | 8,470 (61.4) | |
| Married | 4,938 (35.8) | |
| 395 (2.8) | ||
| Urban | 12,698 (92.0) | |
| Rural | 1,096 (7.9) | |
| Pastoral | 6 (0.1) | |
| Yes | 536 (3.9) | |
| No | 13,267 (96.1) |
*Post-secondary: Preparatory (11–12), Diploma, Undergraduate, and Post-grad Masters/PhD
**Other: Divorce/Separated, Widow/Widower, and other types of relationships.
Prevalence of PTB symptom screen and bacteriologically confirmed-PTB cases.
| n, (Prevalence in %) | p-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | E2 | EG | R1 | R2 | Total | E1 vs R1 | E2 vs R2 | |
| 112 (7) | 165 (5) | 108 (3) | 1152 (38) | 797 (31) | 2334 (17) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| | 74 (5) | 116 (3) | 70 (2) | 832 (28) | 668(26) | 1760 (13) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| | 53 (3) | 122 (4) | 75 (2) | 670 (22) | 495 (19) | 1415 (10) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| | 15 (1) | 28 (1) | 21 (1) | 149 (5) | 120 (5) | 333 (2) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| | 59 (4) | 112 (3) | 78 (2) | 671 (22) | 454 (18) | 1374 (10) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| | 47 (3) | 85 (3) | 40 (1) | 482 (16) | 360 (14) | 1014 (7) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 3 (0.19) | 4 (0.12) | 3 (0.09) | 36 (1.2) | 38 (1.5) | 84 (0.61) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 2 (0.13) | 1 (0.03) | 6 (0.18) | 10 (0.33) | 14 (0.55) | 33 (0.24) | 0.240 | <0.001 | |
| 1 (0.06) | 3 (0.09) | 5 (0.15) | 3 (0.10) | 10 (0.39) | 22 (0.16) | 1 | 0.021 | |
E = Entrants, R = Residents, EG = Entrants screened between E1 and E2 screening, BC-PTB = Bacteriologically-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, TBTx = TB treatment
Diagnostic results for bacteriologically-confirmed PTB cases.
| Group | AFB smear | Xpert/ RIF susceptible | Culture | Results of Drug Sensitivity Testing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E1 | + | + | + | INH |
| 2 | R1 | + | + | + | PZA |
| 3 | R1 | + | + | + | INH |
| 4 | R1 | + | + | + | S |
| 5 | EG | + | + | + | INH |
| 6 | EG | + | + | - | NA |
| 7 | EG | + | + | - | NA |
| 8 | EG | + | + | - | NA |
| 9 | EG | + | + | - | NA |
| 10 | E2 | + | + | + | S |
| 11 | E2 | - | + | + | S |
| 12 | E2 | - | - | + | S |
| 13 | R2 | + | + | + | S |
| 14 | R2 | + | + | + | S |
| 15 | R2 | + | + | + | S |
| 16 | R2 | + | + | - | NA |
| 17 | R2 | + | + | - | NA |
| 18 | R2 | + | + | - | NA |
| 19 | R2 | + | + | - | NA |
| 20 | R2 | + | + | - | NA |
| 21 | R2 | - | - | + | S |
| 22 | R2 | - | - | + | INH |
+ = positive for MTB;— = negative for MTB; NA = not applicable
S = susceptible to all drugs tested by DST (drug sensitivity testing) or line probe assay (LPA)
* Drug testing by LPA only for INH and RIF
DST: INH (isoniazid); RIF (rifampicin); ETH (ethambutol); PZA (pyrazinamide); STM (streptomycin)
= resistant to the indicated anti-TB drug
Sensitivity and specificity of Xpert for MTB detection.
| Xpert | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | 719 | 1 | 720 | 100% | 99.9% | ||||
| Positive | 0 | 18 | 18 | ||||||
| Total | 719 | 19 | 738 | ||||||
| Negative | 155 | 9 | 164 | 76.9% | 94.5% | ||||
| Positive | 3 | 10 | 13 | ||||||
| Total | 158 | 19 | 177 | ||||||
| Negative | 785 | 1 | 786 | 85.7% | 99.9% | ||||
| Positive | 3 | 18 | 21 | ||||||
| Total | 788 | 19 | 807 | ||||||
Bivariate analysis of BC-PTB and risk factors.
| Participant Characteristics | Not PTB | PTB | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 11801 (99.8) | 22 (0.2) | 11823 (85.7) | |
| Female | 1980 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1980 (14.3) | |
| Never Married | 8452 (99.8) | 18 (0.2) | 8470 (61.4) | |
| Married | 4935 (99.9) | 3 (0.1) | 4938 (35.8) | |
| Divorced/Separated | 249 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 249 (1.8) | |
| Widow/Widower | 65 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 65 (0.5) | |
| Other | 80 (98.8) | 1 (1.2) | 81 (0.6) | |
| None | 406 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 406 (2.9) | |
| Student | 1485 (99.9) | 1 (0.1) | 1486 (10.8) | |
| Housewife | 144 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 144 (1.0) | |
| Merchant | 1417 (99.9) | 1 (0.1) | 1418 (10.3) | |
| Gov. employee | 1096 (99.9) | 1 (0.1) | 1097 (7.9) | |
| Peasant | 800 (99.5) | 4 (0.5) | 804 (5.8) | |
| Other | 8433 (99.8) | 15 (0.2) | 8448 (61.2) | |
| No | 13305 (99.9) | 16 (0.1) | 13321 (96.5) | |
| Yes | 476 (98.8) | 6 (1.2) | 482 (3.5) | |
| No | 13044 (99.9) | 17 (0.1) | 13061 (94.6) | |
| Yes | 737 (99.3) | 5 (0.7) | 742 (5.4) | |
| Underweight (<18.5) | 828 (98.9) | 9 (1.1) | 837 (6.3) | |
| Normal (18.5–24.9) | 10082 (99.9) | 12 (0.1) | 10094 (76.3) | |
| Overweight (25–29.9) | 2028 (100.0) | 1 (0.0) | 2029 (15.3) | |
| Obese (≥30) | 267 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 267 (2.0) | |
| Negative | 10362 (99.9) | 12 (0.1) | 10374 (96.3) | |
| Positive | 430 (99.3) | 3 (0.7) | 433 (4.0) | |
| Entrant | 8219 (99.9) | 9 (0.1) | 8228 (59.6) | |
| Resident | 5562 (99.8) | 13 (0.2) | 5575 (40.4) | |
| None to < 1 per day | 11,425 (99.9) | 14 (0.1) | 11,439 (82.9) | |
| ≥ 1 per day | 2347 (99.7) | 8 (0.3) | 2355 (17.1) |
Variables with p>0.20: age (p = 0.586), ethnicity (p = 0.709), education (p = 0.745), literacy (p = 0.504), religion (p = 0.559), previous TB treatment (p = 0.410), diabetes diagnosis (p = 0.247), cancer diagnosis (p = 1.000), residence prior prison (p = 0.611), prior imprisonment (p = 1.000), prior prison duration (none = no stat), current prison duration (p = 0.623), current smoking (p = 0.371), current use of Khat (p = 0.913), number of sex partners (p = 0.801), number of people in the house (p = 0.295), and number of rooms in the house (p = 0.862).
Multi-variate analysis of BC-PTB infection and its related risk factors.
| Characteristic/Variable | AOR | 95% C.I. | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Male | 1.55 x106 | 0.000 | - | |
| Female | 1 | - | - | - |
| Never Married | 1 | - | - | - |
| Married | 0.361 | 0.097 | 1.34 | 0.128 |
| Divorce/Separated | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | 0.995 |
| Widow/Widower | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | 0.997 |
| Other | 5.99 | 0.554 | 64.7 | 0.141 |
| None | 1 | - | - | - |
| Student | 0.898 | 0.000 | - | 1.000 |
| House Wife | 11. 3 | 0.000 | - | 0.999 |
| Merchant | 1.89 x106 | 0.000 | - | 0.994 |
| Government Employee | 2.66 x106 | 0.000 | - | 0.994 |
| Peasant | 1.08 x107 | 0.000 | - | 0.994 |
| Other | 2.46 x106 | 0.000 | - | 0.994 |
| No | 1 | - | - | - |
| Yes | 6.42 | 1.745 | 23.6 | |
| No | 1 | - | - | - |
| Yes | 3.94 | 1.02 | 15.2 | |
| Underweight | 1 | - | - | - |
| Normal weight | 0.196 | 0.058 | 0.66 | 0.009 |
| Overweight | 0.099 | 0.010 | 0.97 | 0.047 |
| Obese | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | 0.995 |
| Negative | 1 | - | - | - |
| Positive | 3.20 | 0.739 | 13.8 | |
| None to < 1 per day | 1 | - | - | - |
| ≥ 1 per day | 1.14 | 0.351 | 3.70 | |
| Entrant | 1 | - | - | - |
| Resident | 1.06 | 0.333 | 3.34 | |
*AOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio
95% C.I. = 95% Confidence Interval