| Literature DB >> 31830061 |
Simon Chengo Masha1,2,3, Collins Owuor1, Joyce Mwongeli Ngoi1, Piet Cools2, Eduard J Sanders1,4, Mario Vaneechoutte2, Tania Crucitti5, Etienne P de Villiers1,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the significance of the human vaginal microbiome for health and disease is increasingly acknowledged, there is paucity of data on the differences in the composition of the vaginal microbiome upon infection with different sexually transmitted pathogens.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31830061 PMCID: PMC6907840 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Socio-demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of pregnant women (N = 53), attending antenatal care at Kilifi County Hospital, Kenya.
| Characteristic | Controls (%) | TV cases (%) | CT cases (%) | χ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18–24 | 28.57 | 38.89 | 64.29 | |
| ≥ 25 | 71.43 | 61.11 | 35.71 | 0.106 |
| Christian | 66.67 | 72.22 | 78.57 | |
| Muslim | 9.52 | 11.11 | 21.43 | |
| Other/None | 23.81 | 16.67 | 0.0 | 0.360 |
| None | 19.05 | 22.22 | 21.43 | |
| Primary | 61.90 | 61.11 | 57.14 | |
| Secondary/Tertiary | 19.05 | 16.67 | 21.43 | 0.996 |
| 0 | 19.05 | 27.78 | 21.43 | |
| 1–2 | 42.86 | 44.44 | 57.14 | |
| 3+ | 38.10 | 27.78 | 21.43 | 0.814 |
| 14–27 | 66.67 | 55.56 | 53.85 | |
| ≥ 28 | 33.33 | 44.44 | 46.15 | 0.692 |
| ≤ 2 | 95.24 | 77.78 | 64.29 | |
| ≥3 | 4.76 | 22.22 | 35.71 | 0.065 |
| Positive | 0.0 | 11.11 | 0.0 | |
| Negative | 100.0 | 88.89 | 100.0 | 0.133 |
| Normal (0–3) | 95.24 | 55.56 | 85.71 | |
| Intermediate (4–6) | 4.76 | 44.44 | 14.29 |
Fig 1Venn diagram of the dominant OTU’s for each group.
Numbers indicate the number of operational taxonomic units OTU’s.
Fig 2Bacterial α-diversity among the different groups of pregnant women in Kilifi, Kenya.
Dot plots represent (A) Shannon index and (B) Simpson index. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. Lines inside dot plots represent mean ± standard error.
Fig 3β-diversity of vaginal microbiomes among the different groups of pregnant women.
β-diversity of vaginal microbiomes among pregnant women with T. vaginalis (n = 18), C. trachomatis (n = 14) and the control group (n = 21). (A) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of the vaginal bacteria of the three groups. Points represent the vaginal microbiomes of individual women at all taxonomic levels; colors indicate the infection status. (B) Principle coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Bray Curtis metrics on Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs).
Fig 4Bar graphs showing relative abundance of genera.
The bar graphs are of genera that were significantly different among the three groups. Women with CT and TV had more Collinsella, Dialister and Prevotella than controls. Women with CT had more Anaerococcus and Corynebacterium than women with TV. Women with TV have more Parvimonas than controls. Pair-wise comparisons are done by t-test and annotated as *; p < 0.05, **; p < 0.01. Standard error is depicted by error bars.