| Literature DB >> 31828155 |
Satoshi Ida1, Ryutaro Kaneko1, Kanako Imataka1, Kazuya Murata1.
Abstract
Previous studies involving patients with diabetes have indicated that sarcopenia is related to renal function. The objective of the present study was to investigate the association between sarcopenia and urinary albumin level, urinary protein level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data were extracted from studies investigating the association between sarcopenia and urinary albumin level, urinary protein level, and eGFR and by calculating odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate pooled OR and 95% CI. Six studies (2662 patients) that met the criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with urinary albumin level with a pooled OR of 2.11 (95% CI, 1.55-2.88; P < 0.001). The pooled ORs of the associations between sarcopenia and urinary protein level and decreased eGFR were 1.82 (95% CI, 1.13-2.92; P = 0.01) and 3.75 (95% CI, 1.24-11.41), respectively. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with urinary albumin level, urinary protein level, and decreased eGFR. However, further investigations are needed, including meta-analyses with a larger number of studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31828155 PMCID: PMC6885774 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1365189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Figure 1Study flow diagram.
Characteristics of the studies included in the present meta-analysis.
| No. | Reference | Year | Region | Design of study | No. of patients | Age† (years) | Women (%) | HbA1c (%) | eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | Definition of sarcopenia | Sarcopenia (%) | Outcome | Adjustment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Han et al. [ | 2016 | Korea | Cross-sectional | 360 | 58 | 56.5 | NR | 87 | ASM/height2 below the cutoff value (7.0 kg/m2 in men and 5.4 kg/m2 in women) using the DXA method according to the recommendations of AWGS | 18.8 | Albuminuria | HTN, BMI, and MetS | |
| 2 | Yang et al. [ | 2016 | China | Cross-sectional | 793 | 51 | 30.6 | 9.2 | 114 | ASM/height2 below the cutoff value (7.26 kg/m2 in men and 5.45 kg/m2 in women) using the anthropometric equation model | 26.2 | Albuminuria and eGFR | Age, BMI, SBP, DBP, HbA1c, FPG, diabetes duration, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, the use of drugs, and physical activities | |
| 3 | Bouchi et al. [ | 2017 | Japan | Longitudinal study | 238 | 64 | 39.2 | 7.1 | 75.6 | SMI (ASM/height2) below the cutoff value (7.0 kg/m2 in men and 5.4 kg/m2 in women) using the DXA method and grip strength below the cutoff value (26 kg in men and 18 kg in women) according to the recommendations of AWGS | 17.6 | Albuminuria | Age, sex, HbA1c, BMI, and TG/HDL-C ratio | |
| 4 | Hwang et al. [ | 2017 | Korea | Cross-sectional | 704 | 69 | 49.5 | NR | 78.1 | SMI (ASM/weight) of 2 SD below the sex-specific mean value for a younger reference group (cutoff point for sarcopenia in men and women: 27.2% and 21.3%, respectively) | 14.2 | Proteinuria | None | |
| 5 | Yoon et al. [ | 2017 | Korea | Cross-sectional | 158 | 64 | 54.7 | NR | 87.6 | SMI (ASM/weight) of 2 SD below the sex-specific mean value for a younger reference group | 11.3 | Albuminuria | Age, BMI, smoking status, alcohol drinking status, physical activities, HTN, DL, CVD, MetS, vitamin D deficiency, estrogen replacement, and renal dysfunction (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) | |
| 6 | Chung et al. [ | 2018 | Korea | Cross-sectional | 409 | 58 | 47.4 | 7.1 | 102.8 | SMI (ASM/weight) of 2 SD below the sex-specific mean value for a younger reference group (cutoff point for sarcopenia in men and women: 35.9% and 30.6%, respectively) | 19.6 | Albuminuria | Sex, age, percent body fat, smoking status, alcohol status, physical activity, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, SBP, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and RAS blocker, statin, fibrate, and insulin use |
†Unless indicated otherwise, data are shown as mean values. Abbreviations: SD: standard deviation; SMI: skeletal muscle mass index; BMI: body mass index; DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; ASM: appendicular skeletal muscle mass; AWGS: Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia; HTN: hypertension; MetS: metabolic syndrome; DL: dyslipidemia; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; TG: triglycerides; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; CVD: cardiovascular disease; HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; RAS: renin-angiotensin system; NR: not reported.
Risk of bias assessment included in the meta-analysis.
| No. | Reference | Selection of participants | Confounding variables | Measurement of exposure | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome date | Selective outcome reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Han et al. [ | L | H | L | L | L | L |
| 2 | Yang et al. [ | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| 3 | Bouchi et al. [ | L | H | L | L | L | L |
| 4 | Hwang et al. [ | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| 5 | Yoon et al. [ | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| 6 | Chung et al. [ | L | H | L | L | L | L |
Abbreviations: L: low risk of bias; U: unclear risk of bias; H: high risk of bias.
Figure 2Forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and albuminuria. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 3Subgroup analysis: forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and albuminuria based on age ≥ 60 or <60 years. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 4Subgroup analysis: forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and albuminuria based on the method of sarcopenia assessment. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 5Subgroup analysis: forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and albuminuria based on eGFR ≥ 90 or <90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 6Subgroup analysis: forest plot of the associations between sarcopenia and albuminuria based on the proportion of women being ≥50% or <50%. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 7Forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and proteinuria. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 8Forest plot of the association between sarcopenia and eGFR. Odds ratios (ORs) in individual studies are presented as squares with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented as extending lines. Pooled OR with its 95% CI is indicated by a diamond.