| Literature DB >> 31827595 |
Wing Sum Siu1,2, Wai Ting Shum1,2, Wen Cheng1,2, Chun Wai Wong1,2, Hoi Ting Shiu1, Chun Hay Ko1, Ping Chung Leung1,2, Christopher Wai Kei Lam3, Chun Kwok Wong1,2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential adverse effects of conventional oral pharmacotherapy of osteoarthritis (OA) restrict their long-term use. Topical application of a Chinese herbal paste for relieving OA knee pain can be effective and safe. However, evidence-based scientific research is insufficient to support its application worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vivo efficacy of a topical Chinese herbal paste on relieving OA knee pain and its underlying mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese Medicine; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Topical treatment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31827595 PMCID: PMC6902578 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-019-0278-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Quantitative analysis on the chemical markers in the DAEP herbal paste and their transdermal property
| Chemical marker | Herb | Conc. in paste (%) | Conc. in porcine skin (μg) | Conc. in receiving chamber (μg) | Molecular weight (g/mol) | Topological polar surface area (A2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginsenoside Ro | ABR | 0.15 | 6.64 | 0.00 | 957.12 | 312.0 |
| Chikusetsusaponin IV A | ABR | 0.01 | 12.39 | 0.00 | 927.09 | 292.0 |
| Asperosaponin VI | DR | 1.77 | 393.48 | 5.09 | 929.11 | 295.0 |
| Pinoresinol diglucoside | EC | 0.23 | 80.38 | 8.42 | 682.67 | 236.0 |
| β-ecdysterone | ABR | 0.02 | 4.82 | 0.51 | 480.64 | 138.0 |
| Psoralen | PF | 0.37 | 54.41 | 9.25 | 186.17 | 39.4 |
| Isopsoralen | PF | 0.33 | 45.11 | 9.51 | 186.17 | 39.4 |
Fig. 1The UPLC profile of the DAEP herbal paste. Chemical profile of DAEP at 203 nm, mixed with 212 nm, 248 nm, 277 nm showing the peaks of all standard chemical markers, except chikusetsusaponin IV A
Rat primer sequences of target genes
| Primer | Forward/Reverse | Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | Forward | ATCTGCCCTTCAGGAACAGC |
| Reverse | AGCCTCCGACTTGTGAAGTG | |
| TNF-α | Forward | CAGCCGATTTGCCATTTCATAC |
| Reverse | GGCTCTGAGGAGTAGACGATAA | |
| iNOS | Forward | CTCAGGCTTGGGTCTTGTTAG |
| Reverse | TGTTGTTGGGCTGGGAATAG | |
| COX-2 | Forward | TCTCCAACCTCTCCTACTACAC |
| Reverse | CTCCACCGATGACCTGATATTT | |
| MMP-3 | Forward | GGACCAGGGATTAATGGAGATG |
| Reverse | CAGGGTCCAGAGAGTTAGATTTG | |
| GAPDH | Forward | CAACGACCCCTTCATTGACC |
| Reverse | CGCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT |
Fig. 2Radiographic images showing the development of OA at knee. Representative digital X-ray images from medial–lateral approach of the right knee were obtained before the ACLT (Day 0) and then biweekly thereafter (Week 2, 4, 6 and 8). Obvious destruction of the posterior tibial plateau is indicated by arrow. The destruction was reduced by the DAEP topical treatment at Week 2 as indicated by the arrowhead. Sham: the group of rats received surgical procedures to expose the knee joint cavity only, but without ACLT and meniscus resection, without treadmill running and DAEP treatment. Control: The group of rats received surgical procedures to expose the knee joint cavity, with ACLT and meniscus resection, with treadmill running but without DAEP topical treatment. DAEP: The group of rats received all the surgical procedures and treadmill running as Control, together with DAEP topical treatment
Static weight ratio measured by the Incapacitance test
| Week | Mean (%) ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham (n = 5) | Control (n = 11) | DAEP (n = 12) | |
| 0 | 92.30 ± 11.55 | 102.04 ± 9.24 | 100.60 ± 13.87 |
| 2 | 89.65 ± 15.78 | 74.38 ± 12.26*** | 83.80 ± 16.86** |
| 4 | 102.52 ± 8.72 | 82.05 ± 11.53**,# | 89.61 ± 12.09 |
| 6 | 100.75 ± 13.73 | 97.06 ± 12.19 | 89.93 ± 9.18 |
| 8 | 108.22 ± 11.73 | 89.71 ± 18.98# | 93.29 ± 13.08 |
Sham: the group of rats received surgical procedures to expose the knee joint cavity only, but without ACLT and meniscus resection, without treadmill running and DAEP treatment. Control: The group of rats received surgical procedures to expose the knee joint cavity, with ACLT and meniscus resection, with treadmill running but without DAEP topical treatment. DAEP: The group of rats received all the surgical procedures and treadmill running as Control, together with DAEP topical treatment
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs Week 0; #p < 0.05 vs Sham
Fig. 3Comparisons of CatWalk parameters among groups throughout the experiment. Changes in gait parameters: a Stand Phase; b Duty Cycle; c Print Area; d Maximum Intensity; e Swing Speed. Results were shown in bar charts with mean + standard deviation; Δp < 0.05, ΔΔp < 0.01; ΔΔΔp < 0.001 (compared with the group denoted by n-zig-zag line); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (compared with baseline (Week 0) of its own group). n = 5, 11 and 12 for Sham, Control and DAEP group, respectively
Fig. 4Effect of DAEP on gene expression of the articular cartilage of OA. Fold changes in IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS, COX-2 and MMP-3. Results are shown in bar charts with mean + standard error of mean (SEM); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (compared with the group denoted by n-zig-zag line). n = 5, 10 and 10 for Sham, Control and DAEP group, respectively
Fig. 5Effect of DAEP on protein expression in NF-κB pathway. Total protein of the articular cartilage from the distal femur of the OA limb was collected and then evaluated by Western blot. β-actin was used as an internal control (a). Protein expression relating to inflammation (b) and matrix degradation (c) was quantified by densitometry using ImageJ software and normalized to the β-actin level. Results are shown in bar charts with mean + standard error of mean (SEM), * p < 0.05 compared with the Sham. n = 3, 6 and 6 for Sham, Control and DAEP group, respectively