Wing-Sum Siu1, Xuelin Zhou2, Chak-Hei Fung3, Wai-Ting Shum4, Clara Bik-San Lau5, Ping-Chung Leung6, Chun-Hay Ko7, Leung-Kim Hung8. 1. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: sammysiu@cuhk.edu.hk. 2. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: peterxlzhou@gmail.com. 3. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. Electronic address: fungchakhei@yahoo.com.hk. 4. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: awtshum@cuhk.edu.hk. 5. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: claralau@cuhk.edu.hk. 6. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: pingcleung@cuhk.edu.hk. 7. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong; Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518057, China. Electronic address: gohey@cuhk.edu.hk. 8. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. Electronic address: leungkimhung@cuhk.edu.hk.
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Patients suffering from musculoskeletal pain and swellings occupy many hospital beds and demand many rehabilitation facilities. Chinese Medicine is offering many alternatives to ameliorate pain and swelling. However, evidence-based scientific publications supporting their efficacy on pain relief are inadequate. The in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a topical use Chinese herbal bath formula (HB) on anti-inflammation and swelling control was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The therapeutic mechanisms of HB were studied in vitro via anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic assays on RAW264.7 and HUVEC cells, respectively. Fibroblast proliferation was also studied with Hs27 cells. The in vivo angiogenic effect of HB was also studied using zebrafish model, while its efficacy of in vivo anti-Inflammation and swelling control were investigated using rat paw edema model. The affected paw was treated by immersing it in the HB or distilled water as control. The sensation of pain, change in paw thickness and inflammation marker in serum were analyzed. RESULTS: In the anti-inflammation assay, HB significantly inhibited nitrite release from RAW264.7 by 47.6% at 800 μg/ml. In the pro-angiogenic assays, it reduced wound area in HUVEC by 8.2% and increased tube formation of HUVEC by 11.5% at 300 μg/ml. HB also stimulated Hs27 proliferation up to 23.5% at 1200 μg/ml. It showed in vivo pro-angiogenic effect by increasing the mean sprout number in the embryos of zebrafish by 2.4 folds. The in vivo therapeutic effects of HB on edema was illustrated by the significant longer thermal withdrawal latency and thinner paw thickness compared with control. After 14 days of treatment, HB also reduced the IL-6 concentration in the serum of rat by 20.9% significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that HB is effective for swelling control and pain relief from edema due to its anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic properties.
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Patients suffering from musculoskeletal pain and swellings occupy many hospital beds and demand many rehabilitation facilities. Chinese Medicine is offering many alternatives to ameliorate pain and swelling. However, evidence-based scientific publications supporting their efficacy on pain relief are inadequate. The in vitro and in vivo efficacy of a topical use Chinese herbal bath formula (HB) on anti-inflammation and swelling control was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The therapeutic mechanisms of HB were studied in vitro via anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic assays on RAW264.7 and HUVEC cells, respectively. Fibroblast proliferation was also studied with Hs27 cells. The in vivo angiogenic effect of HB was also studied using zebrafish model, while its efficacy of in vivo anti-Inflammation and swelling control were investigated using rat paw edema model. The affected paw was treated by immersing it in the HB or distilled water as control. The sensation of pain, change in paw thickness and inflammation marker in serum were analyzed. RESULTS: In the anti-inflammation assay, HB significantly inhibited nitrite release from RAW264.7 by 47.6% at 800 μg/ml. In the pro-angiogenic assays, it reduced wound area in HUVEC by 8.2% and increased tube formation of HUVEC by 11.5% at 300 μg/ml. HB also stimulated Hs27 proliferation up to 23.5% at 1200 μg/ml. It showed in vivo pro-angiogenic effect by increasing the mean sprout number in the embryos of zebrafish by 2.4 folds. The in vivo therapeutic effects of HB on edema was illustrated by the significant longer thermal withdrawal latency and thinner paw thickness compared with control. After 14 days of treatment, HB also reduced the IL-6 concentration in the serum of rat by 20.9% significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that HB is effective for swelling control and pain relief from edema due to its anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic properties.
Authors: Wing Sum Siu; Wai Ting Shum; Wen Cheng; Chun Wai Wong; Hoi Ting Shiu; Chun Hay Ko; Ping Chung Leung; Christopher Wai Kei Lam; Chun Kwok Wong Journal: Chin Med Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 5.455