Literature DB >> 31827250

Identification of novel FBN1 variations implicated in congenital scoliosis.

Mao Lin1,2,3, Sen Zhao1,4, Gang Liu1,4, Yingzhao Huang1,4, Chenxi Yu1,2, Yanxue Zhao1, Lianlei Wang1,2, Yuanqiang Zhang1,2, Zihui Yan1,2, Shengru Wang1, Sen Liu1,4, Jiaqi Liu4,5, Yongyu Ye6, Yaping Chen1, Xu Yang1, Bingdu Tong1, Zheng Wang3,7, Xinzhuang Yang8, Yuchen Niu8, Xiaoxin Li8, Yipeng Wang1,4,9, Jianzhong Su10, Jian Yuan10, Hengqiang Zhao10, Shuyang Zhang11, Guixing Qiu1,4,9, Shiro Ikegawa3, Jianguo Zhang1,4,9, Zhihong Wu12,13,14, Nan Wu15,16,17.   

Abstract

Congenital scoliosis (CS) is a form of scoliosis caused by congenital vertebral malformations. Genetic predisposition has been demonstrated in CS. We previously reported that TBX6 loss-of-function causes CS in a compound heterozygous model; however, this model can explain only 10% of CS. Many monogenic and polygenic CS genes remain to be elucidated. In this study, we analyzed exome sequencing (ES) data of 615 Chinese CS from the Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) project. Cosegregation studies for 103 familial CS identified a novel heterozygous nonsense variant, c.2649G>A (p.Trp883Ter) in FBN1. The association between FBN1 and CS was then analyzed by extracting FBN1 variants from ES data of 574 sporadic CS and 828 controls; 30 novel variants were identified and prioritized for further analyses. A mutational burden test showed that the deleterious FBN1 variants were significantly enriched in CS subjects (OR = 3.9, P = 0.03 by Fisher's exact test). One missense variant, c.2613A>C (p.Leu871Phe) was recurrent in two unrelated CS subjects, and in vitro functional experiments for the variant suggest that FBN1 may contribute to CS by upregulating the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling. Our study expanded the phenotypic spectrum of FBN1, and provided nove insights into the genetic etiology of CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31827250      PMCID: PMC6983459          DOI: 10.1038/s10038-019-0698-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


Introduction

Congenital scoliosis (CS) is a form of scoliosis caused by congenital vertebral malformations potentially resulting from formation failure, segmentation defects, or a combination of both [1]. The prevalence of CS is ~0.5–1 per 1000 live births [2]. As a major cause to infantile and adolescent disability, CS perturbs patient lives and daily activities both physically and psychologically [3]. Genetic predisposition has been demonstrated in CS [4, 5]. CS is a consequence of single-gene mutations. We previously reported that a heterozygous 16p11.2 deletion or rare TBX6 loss-of-function (LoF) variants together with a common hypomorphic risk haplotype composed by three SNPs in trans cause CS [6]. We subsequently recapitulated this compound heterozygosity model in a gene-edited mouse [7], and defined the unique and clinically actionable phenotype of a monogenic form of CS, TBX6-associated CS (TACS) [8]. However, this model can explain only about 10% of CS [8, 9]. Many other contributor genes remain to be elucidated. CS is also a consequence of multifactorial gene-environment mutual interaction [10]. The susceptibility of some polygenic defects has been illustrated in CS cases, accompanied with multiple birth defects [11]. Previous studies have reported several CS-associated genes, including PAX1 (MIM #167411) [12], PTK7 (MIM #601890) [13], DLL1 (MIM #606582) [14], DDR2 (MIM #191311) [15], T (MIM #601397) [16], and numerous other genes are thus far known to cause phenotypes involving scoliosis with vertebral malformations; however, their potential contribution to CS has been poorly investigated. Here, as a part of the Deciphering Disorders Involving Scoliosis and COmorbidities (DISCO) project, we conducted exome sequencing (ES) for a CS cohort. Trio-based analyses on familial cases identified a novel nonsense variant in FBN1, the gene implicated in Marfan syndrome (MFS; MIM#154700) and many monogenic diseases with scoliosis and spinal dysplasia. We then examined the effect of rare FBN1 variants on sporadic CS and observed that deleterious missense variants were significantly enriched in CS. Functional analyses of a recurrent FBN1 missense variant revealed the potential association between upregulation of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling and CS. The subjects carrying highly deleterious FBN1 variants had vertebral malformations, malformations of the ribs, and intraspinal defects.

Materials and methods

Participant recruitment

Initially, 615 Chinese CS subjects with complete clinical data and ES data were recruited at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China from 2010 to 2018, as a pivotal part of DISCO study (http://www.discostudy.org/). There were 103 familial cases with available samples for first-degree relatives. TBX6 mutations were examined and 41 cases molecularly diagnosed as TACS [6, 8] were removed. Consequently, 574 CS cases were retained for further study. For the control subjects, 828 unrelated Chinese iindividuals without apparent spinal deformity were ascertained. The ethical committees or institutional review boards at PUMCH that contributed to the patient samples approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant or their guardians (for those younger than 16 years old).

Exome Sequencing and Sanger sequencing

Genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The ES data were processed and analyzed using the PUMCH Pipeline as previously described [17]. The following public available databases were used for mutation annotation: the 1000 Genomes Project (1KG; http://www.internationalgenome.org), the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP; http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC; http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), and Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; http://gnomad-old.broadinstitute.org), Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp). In silico prediction tools, including Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [18], Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (Polyphen-2) [19], Mutation Taster [20], and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) [21] were utilized to predict deleterious properties of variants. We also annotated the detected variants using customized database based on Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD; www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/) and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (https://omim.org/). Empirically, we utilized the recommended filters of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (v2.2–3) prior to performing association analyses in order to guarantee that the risk of false negatives is minimized to select quality control passed variants [22]. Sanger sequencing by using an Applied Biosystem 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies, CA, USA) was conducted to confirm the candidate variants identified by ES, and segregation analyses were performed in family members. The RefSeq accession numbers of the transcript and corresponding protein isoform of FBN1 we used for mutation nomenclature were NM_000138.4 and NP_000129.3, respectively.

Mutational burden analyses

Mutational burden analyses of FBN1 were implemented between 574 CS cases and 828 controls. To alleviate the biased factors attributable to differential sequencing coverage, we conducted harmonization analyses between case and control exomes. An individual RefSeq coding sequence site was excluded from the analysis if the absolute difference in percentages of cases compared with controls with adequate coverage of the site differed by >10%. This site-based pruning resulted in exclusion of 4.8% of the Refseq coding sequence sites. We also introduced a likely gene-disrupting (LGD) model [23] to prioritize the candidate variants. The LGD model is defined by clustering LoF variants (nonsense, splice-site, and insertion/deletion). A damaging missense (D-mis) model was also applied for variant prioritization. D-mis is defined by selection of D-mis variants with a predicted CADD score ≥ 20. In viewing of the dominant traits that FBN1 may have, inclusion criteria were strictly set to select the presumably LGD and D-mis variants to identify risk-conferring variants to CS. Variants that are not present at this time in 1KG, ESP, ExAC, dbSNP, the Universal Mutation Database for FBN1 (UMD-FBN1; http://www.umd.be/FBN1/) [24] were defined as “novel.” Only novel variants were subjected to the burden analysis. We applied a collapsing method [25] to detect the association of mutational burden. The CADD score of 20, which corresponds to the top 1% of damage when evaluating all known allelic variants [26], was set as the cutoff value for creating a stratified variants subgroup for collapsing.

Construction of expression plasmids

We constructed a plasmid expressing full-length FBN1 (GenBank: NM_000138.4) cDNA with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion, pEGFP-FBN1. A full-length FBN1 cDNA having suitable restriction sites was PCR-amplified using KOD-Plus-Neo (Toyobo, Japan). The PCR amplicons were cloned into the NheI and SacII sites of the pEGFP-N1 expression vector (Clontech, Takara Bio, Japan). The construct for the Leu871Phe variant was generated by QuikChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). All plasmid constructs were subjected to Sanger sequencing for verification.

Cell culture and transfection

HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Biological Industries, CT, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were seeded in a six-well plates and transfected with Lipofectamine™ 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The medium was replaced with fresh DMEM culture medium 6 h after transfection. The cells were further incubated for 48 h.

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen) and treated with RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). Total RNA was reversely transcribed to cDNA by using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (#RR037A, Clontech). The relative abundance of targeted mRNA was normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The primers 5’-CAAGGGCATCCTGGGCTACACT-3′ and 5′- CTCTCTCTTCCTCTTGTGCTCTTGC-3′ were used for amplification of GAPDH; 5′-ACCTGGTTACTTCCGCATAG-3′ and 5′-GAGGCATCAGTTTCGTTTGT-3′ were used for amplification of EGFP-FBN1. Gene expression was determined using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) on the 7500Fast Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems).

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed with modified RIPA (50 mM Tris-HCL, 1% NP40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA; CompleteTM Protease Inhibitor Cocktail [Roche, Mannheim, Germany]), and protein concentrations were determined with the PierceTM BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, USA). A total of 5 mg protein was size separated on an 8% SDS polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked in powdered milk for 30 min at room temperature (RT, 25 °C), and primary antibodies (Phospho-Smad2 [Ser465/467] (138D4) Rabbit mAb #3108, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA; Smad2/3 [D7G7] XP® Rabbit mAb #8685, Cell Signaling Technology; Mouse Anti-β actin mAb, TA-09, ZSGB-bio, China) were incubated overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the corresponding horseradish-peroxidase-coupled IRDye® 800CW Goat anti-Mouse IgG Secondary Antibody (926-32210, LI-COR, NE, USA) were incubated for 1 h at RT. Bands were visualized with the WesternBright ECL HRP substrate chemiluminescent system (Advansta, CA, USA). Chemiluminescent signals were quantified using ImageJ [27].

Statistical analyses

A one-sided Fisher’s exact test or a one-sided Chi-square test was used for all mutational burden analyses by using SPSS Statistics 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Al Monk, NY, USA), and a Student's t test was used to compare the differences of qPCR and WB results. All cell experiments were independently repeated three times with different cell lysates for each single assay, and data were presented as mean ± S.E.M. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Identification of a novel FBN1 null variant transmitted in a CS family

We applied ES to identify responsible variants with autosomal dominant inheritance in all 103 familial CS. We identified a maternally inherited LGD variant associated with the vertebral phenotypes in a family. The novel heterozygous LGD variant was c.2649G>A (p.Trp883Ter) in FBN1, which co-segregated with CS in a dominant family (Fig. 1a, b). The nonsense variant was considered to exert a significant LoF effect by triggering the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay mechanism and subsequently loss of FBN1 protein. The proband III-1 displayed CS with structural segmentation defect of the vertebrae (T10-L1) and the formation of vertebral bar on the left side (T10-L1) (Fig. 1c), whereas the mother II-2 exhibited severe congenital kyphosis with segmentation defects (Fig. 1d). Although the mitral valve prolapse with mild mitral insufficiency was found in the proband, no other apparent cardiovascular or ocular phenotypes featuring MFS were identified in the proband and his mother. The aortic root measurements of the proband still remained normal (Z score = 1.4) by echocardiographic measurements, and the diagnosis of MFS could not be implemented according to the Ghent Criteria [28]. As for now, no obvious “marfanoid” appearances are observed in the family members. i.e., III-1 and II-2 (Supplementary Table 1).
Fig. 1

The family with congenital scoliosis and an FBN1 nonsense variant, c.2649G>A (p.Trp883Ter). a Pedigree and segregation of the variant. b Electropherograms of Sanger sequencing showing the heterozygous c.2649G>A in the proband (III-1) and his mother (II-2). Ref., the reference sequence. Black arrows indicate the nucleotide substitution positions. c Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray film of the whole spine of the proband III-1 displaying congenital scoliosis with segmentation defects of thoracic 10-lumbar 1 spine with formation of vertebral bar on the left. d Lateral X-ray film of the whole spine of II-2 showing severe congenital kyphosis with segmentation defects.

The family with congenital scoliosis and an FBN1 nonsense variant, c.2649G>A (p.Trp883Ter). a Pedigree and segregation of the variant. b Electropherograms of Sanger sequencing showing the heterozygous c.2649G>A in the proband (III-1) and his mother (II-2). Ref., the reference sequence. Black arrows indicate the nucleotide substitution positions. c Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray film of the whole spine of the proband III-1 displaying congenital scoliosis with segmentation defects of thoracic 10-lumbar 1 spine with formation of vertebral bar on the left. d Lateral X-ray film of the whole spine of II-2 showing severe congenital kyphosis with segmentation defects. In addition, we did not observe any LoF variants other than the FBN1 p.Trp883Ter in any of the family members.

Novel deleterious coding variants in FBN1 are enriched in CS patients

Concerning the potential association between FBN1 and CS, we further compared the difference of the frequency of FBN1 variants between sporadic CS cases and controls. We subsequently identified a total of 30 novel variants (28 missense, 1 frameshift, and 1 splicing variant) in 16 out of the 574 CS cases and 14 out of 828 in-house controls. When all 30 variants were evaluated by the collapsing method, no significant association with CS was observed (OR = 1.6, P = 0.15 by one-sided Chi-square test). Next, the variants were stratified based on their deleteriousness determined by the CADD score. In the group of CADD score < 20, a total of 19 variants were subjected to the collapsed analysis without mutation types stratification and no statistical difference was identified. Further stratification within this group based on mutation types did not show any statistical difference in any mutation types (Table 1). In contrast, in the group of CADD score ≥ 20, a total of 11 missense variants were identified; eight in CS and three in controls, respectively. The eight missense variants (including one recurrent variant) were significantly enriched in CS (OR = 3.9, P = 0.03 by one-sided Fisher’s exact test) (Table 1). Sanger sequencing results of the eight cases are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Intriguingly, we have also checked the FBN1 mutations in our study but did not identify any overlapping variants with the idiopathic scoliosis cohort reported by Buchan et al. [29].
Table 1

Mutational burden analysis of FBN1 variants in congenital scoliosis.

VariantTotal number of variantsNumber of alternative allelesOR (95% CI)P value
Congenital scoliosis (n = 574)In-house control (n = 828)
Total3016141.6 (0.8–3.2)0.15
CADD score < 20198111.0 (0.4–2.6)0.55
 Frameshift1010.60
 Splicing1100.41
 Missense177101.0 (0.4–2.7)0.60
CADD score ≥  2011833.9 (1.0–14.6)0.03
 Missense11833.9 (1.0–14.6)0.03

Association in the allelic model was calculated using Fisher’s exact test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, CADD Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion

Mutational burden analysis of FBN1 variants in congenital scoliosis. Association in the allelic model was calculated using Fisher’s exact test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, CADD Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion

Genetic and phenotypic analyses of the CS individuals harboring candidate variants

The genetic information and in silico deleteriousness predictions of the eight variants are presented in Table 2. One missense variant: p.Leu871Phe (CADD score = 23.9) was recurrent in two unrelated CS subjects. Leu871 was located within the hybrid 2 motif region of the protein (Fig. 2), which is an evolutionary ‘hybrid’ between TGF-β binding protein-like (TB) and calcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like (cbEGF-like) domains [30]. Previous studies indicated that mutations situated within this domain disrupted the ratio of an α-helix to β-sheet leading to a more compact conformation [31]. In addition, conservation analysis of amino acid residue of Leu871 in FBN1 indicated that it is highly conserved throughout evolution and across many selected species, suggesting it is required for the normal function of the protein (Fig. S2). The remaining six missense variants predicted with highly deleterious properties were located in epidermal growth factor-like (EGF-like) domains or cbEGF-like domains (Fig. 2), playing a seminal role in diseases [32].
Table 2

Candidate FBN1 variants in congenital scoliosis.

Subject IDGenomic positionaNucleotide changebProtein changecExon numberFamily and domainAF in gnomADIn silico prediction toold
ALLEASSIFTPolyphen-2Mutation tasterCADD score
XH116248902987c.284C>Gp.Ser95Trp4EGF-likee #0100DDD22.7
XH81048807596c.1456G>Tp.Gly486Trp12EGF-like #0400DDD24.6
XH15248805763c.1571C>Ap.Thr524Lys13cbEGF-likef #0300TDD32
XH7348787384c.2613A>Cp.Leu871Phe22Hybrid motif #020.000004060.000058DDD23.9
XH57948787384c.2613A>Cp.Leu871Phe22Hybrid motif #020.000004060.000058DDD23.9
XH76648779535c.3437T>Gp.Leu1146Arg28cbEGF-like #1300DPD26.4
XH90248729214c.6440G>Ap.Gly2147Asp53cbEGF-like #3200TDD34
XH44148722914c.6825C>Gp.Ile2275Met56cbEGF-like #3500TDD20.6

gnomAD Genome Aggregation Database, AF allele frequency, ALL all populations, EAS east Asian, D damaging, P probably damaging, T tolerated

aChromosomal position based on GRCh37/hg19

b,cThe RefSeq transcript number of FBN1 is NM_000138.4

dIn silico prediction tools to evaluate a genetic variant for its deleterious potential

eEpidermal growth factor-like domain

fCalcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like domain

Fig. 2

Schematic representation of the distribution of the candidate FBN1 variants identified in congenital scoliosis. Protein structure is redrawn from the UMD-FBN1 database. Black dots indicate the location of missense and nonsense variants.

Candidate FBN1 variants in congenital scoliosis. gnomAD Genome Aggregation Database, AF allele frequency, ALL all populations, EAS east Asian, D damaging, P probably damaging, T tolerated aChromosomal position based on GRCh37/hg19 b,cThe RefSeq transcript number of FBN1 is NM_000138.4 dIn silico prediction tools to evaluate a genetic variant for its deleterious potential eEpidermal growth factor-like domain fCalcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like domain Schematic representation of the distribution of the candidate FBN1 variants identified in congenital scoliosis. Protein structure is redrawn from the UMD-FBN1 database. Black dots indicate the location of missense and nonsense variants. The eight subjects harbored the FBN1 variants displayed different types of vertebral malformations (Table 3). Malformations of the ribs were also found in three subjects (Table 3). Notably, intraspinal defects (diastematomyelia, syringomyelia, and tethered cord) were identified in five subjects (Table 3). Although mild mitral insufficiency and pectus carinatum deformity presented in XH902, aortic root measurements still remained normal (Z score = 1.6), and ocular phenotypes supporting MFS were not present. This patient would be categorized as “potential MFS” until the aorta reaches threshold (Z score = 3) [28]. The remaining seven subjects had no cardiovascular or ocular manifestations (Table 3), and hence they were not diagnosed as MFS. We have also re-evaluated the other marfanoid musculoskeletal phenotypes of these eight cases, and observed that no apparent manifestations except Patient XH902 with pectus carinatum deformity (Supplementary Table 2).
Table 3

Phenotypic manifestations of the congenital scoliosis subjects with deleterious FBN1 missense variants.

Subject IDAge (year)GenderMCA (degree)Malformation involvedOther complication
VertebralCostalIntraspinalCardiovascularOcular
XH11626M65SD, FL, LF, HNNNNShort neck
XH8107F48BNTethered cordNNN
XH15211M72H, W, FLNNNNPulmonary dysfunction
XH7312F40SDIntercostal cohesion of bilateral 2–5th ribsDiastematomyelia, hypoplastic spinal processesNNN
XH5792M104W, FF, SDBilateral 12th rib absencesyringomyelia, tethered cordNNJoint contractures
XH7661M80B, HNNNNN
XH90211M77SD, WNSyringomyeliaMitral insufficiencyNPectus carinatum
XH4411M50SD, FF, BBilateral 13th ribsDiastematomyelia, syringomyeliaNNN

MCA maximal Cobb angle, M male, F female, SD segmentation defect, FL fused lamina, LF lamina fissure, H hemivertebrae, B butterfly-vertebrae, W wedge-shaped vertebrae, FF formation failure of vertebrae, N not present

Phenotypic manifestations of the congenital scoliosis subjects with deleterious FBN1 missense variants. MCA maximal Cobb angle, M male, F female, SD segmentation defect, FL fused lamina, LF lamina fissure, H hemivertebrae, B butterfly-vertebrae, W wedge-shaped vertebrae, FF formation failure of vertebrae, N not present

Functional study of the recurrent variant, Leu871Phe

We overexpressed either human FBN1 wild-type or p.Leu871Phe in HEK293T cells. Total RNA was reversely transcribed to cDNA 48 h after transfection. The mRNA expression level of the p.Leu871Phe FBN1 showed no statistical difference to that of the WT plasmid (P = 0.38 by Student’s t test) (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

Functional analyses of the recurrent missense variant, c.2613A>C (p.Leu871Phe). a The expression of FBN1 mRNAs from HEK293T cells transfected with the empty vector (EV), wild type (WT), or mutant (p. Leu871Phe: L871F) FBN1 plasmids. ns not significant. b Western blotting for the protein lysates. c, d Quantification of the western blotting results. The ratio of phosphorylated Smad2 and total Smad2 to β-actin are shown normalized to WT plasmid. Data are expressed as arbitrary units indicating mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by Student’s t test, *P < 0.05. ns not significant.

Functional analyses of the recurrent missense variant, c.2613A>C (p.Leu871Phe). a The expression of FBN1 mRNAs from HEK293T cells transfected with the empty vector (EV), wild type (WT), or mutant (p. Leu871Phe: L871F) FBN1 plasmids. ns not significant. b Western blotting for the protein lysates. c, d Quantification of the western blotting results. The ratio of phosphorylated Smad2 and total Smad2 to β-actin are shown normalized to WT plasmid. Data are expressed as arbitrary units indicating mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated by Student’s t test, *P < 0.05. ns not significant. Previous studies have demonstrated that deleterious FBN1 mutations upregulate endogenous TGF-β signaling, which could be measured via phosphorylation of Smad2 (p-Smad2), a downstream target [33]. Transfected cells with the p.Leu871Phe FBN1 showed significantly elevated p-Smad2 level compared with the WT (P = 0.02 by Student’s t test) (Fig. 3b–d), while they showed no statistical difference in expression of total Smad2 compared with the WT (P = 0.96 by Student’s t test).

Discussion

In the present study, we conducted family-based ES analysis and allele-based mutational burden analysis, and provided evidence for the genetic association between FBN1 and CS. We then performed in vitro functional assay for a recurrent FBN1 variant (p.Leu871Phe) and revealed the upregulation of TGF-β signaling caused by the variant. Clinical features for the CS cases with FBN1 variants showed the expansion of the FBN1-related disease entity. FBN1 encodes a connective tissue protein essential to extracellular microfibrils organization in dermal fibroblasts and skeletal muscle cells [34]. FBN1 is well known as a causal gene for MFS, which often has scoliosis without structural changes of the vertebrae and ribs. On the other hand, FBN1 mutations also cause various skeletal dysplasia, including Acromicric dysplasia (MIM #102370), Geleophysic dysplasia 2 (MIM #614185), Marfan lipodystrophy syndrome (MIM #616914), and Weill–Marchesani syndrome 2 (MIM #608328). These monogenic diseases have a broad range of vertebral phenotypes quite different from MFS. In a previous study, a novel FBN1 variant, p.Gly1796Glu co-segregated in a family with an autosomal dominant vertebral dysplasia featuring CS, in the absence of cardiac or ocular findings [35], indicating that FBN1 could be a disease gene for monogenic form of CS. Our case also confirmed that FBN1 causes CS as an autosomal dominant disease trait pattern. The index case in our study was from an unusual three-generation CS family segregating FBN1 LoF variant, c.2649G>A (p.Trp883Ter), which has been previously reported to be a pathogenic nonsense mutation associated with MFS [36], and deposited in HGMD (accession ID: CM161831). This nonsense substitution truncates the protein at codon 883, which is 1989 amino acids from the end of the protein. According to the ACMG guidelines for classifying pathogenic variants [37], this nonsense mutation is a convincing pathogenic LoF allele based on the following evidences: (a) PVS1: this nonsense variant is interpreted at the internal part of FBN1 gene where LoF is a known mechanism [38]; (b) PP1: cosegregation with CS phenotypes in the affected family members; (c)PP3: multiple computational evidence supports highly deleterious properties (Mutation Taster prediction shows deleterious; conservation prediction score by GERP is 4.81; CADD score is 42); (d)PP5: Franken et al. recently reported this variant as a pathogenic LoF allele associated with MFS, but the detailed evaluations for spinal/vertebral phenotypes were unavailable [36]. Notably, it has been widely reported that the high degree of clinical variability associated with FBN1 variants. For instance, distinct genetic mechanisms, encompassing a second deleterious variant in another gene or a polygenic model involving modifier loci, are proposed to account for this clinical variability [39]. Thus, the occurrence of a pathogenic variant in FBN1 is not necessarily associated with or produces MFS. Consistently with our findings, some FBN1 nonsense mutations (c.284C>A, p.Ser95Ter; c.1347_1348dupTA, p.Thr450IlefsTer130) only caused isolated skeletal features, with no cardiac or ocular findings [40]. Pathogenic FBN1 variants cause MFS but can also be found in patients presenting with apparently isolated features. For instance, the c.1453C>T, p.(Arg485Cys) mutation in FBN1 has been identified in both autosomal dominant and recessive diseases characterized by a high extent of phenotypic variability [41, 42]. Hence, it is reasonable to postulate that the c.2649G>A allele, which has been associated with MFS, could also account for the isolated CS in our study. FBN1 is implicated in vertebral growth and development [43]. Fibrillin microfibrils in the calf are ubiquitously distributed in the vertebral growth plate and involved in growth factor binding, playing a pivotal role in regulating bone growth [43]. Moreover, a murine model with an intragenic duplication of Fbn1 presented markedly enlarged lumbar vertebra and elongated costal cartilages [44]. Functional follow-up of Fbn1Tsk mouse unveiled the interactions of FBN1 with the Wnt signaling pathway [45] and its pivotal role for somitegenesis and vertebrate segmentation [4]. Since CS is induced by localized changes in vertebral body development [46], we proposed that factors distorting the normal localization process of the spine column may contribute to the pathogenesis of CS, such as FBN1. TGF-β plays critical roles in development and maintenance of the skeleton [47]. The two unrelated patients (XH73 and XH579) sharing the p.Leu871Phe variant presented CS with vertebral segmentation defects, rib anomalies, and diastematomyelia. Our in vitro experimental results showed upregulation of the TGF-β signaling by the p.Leu871Phe variant, supporting the pathogenicity of the mutation. TGF-β signaling plays a critical role in cartilage and spine tissue development, upregulation of the TGF-β signaling pathway within the intervertebral disc could cause the occurrence of vertebral fusions [48]. The observations suggest that the upregulation of the TGF-β signaling pathway confer susceptibility to CS. In prior reports, the excess TGF-β activation and signaling have been frequently observed in FBN1-deficient humans and mice [29, 49]. Regarding a mutational burden test for CS with a complex disease trait, the most important thing is not to focus disproportionately on specific variants, but rather to integrate across all types of risk-associated variants. In some individuals, risk may be caused by an unusual combination of common variants and rare variants, like the TACS compound inheritance model [6-8], whereas in others it may be due to an accumulation of rare or ultra-rare variants. In this context, it seemed actionable to stratify the FBN1 variants by the mutation types and CADD C-score prior to detecting the association by the collapsing method [25]. The knowledge about the variants associated with CS and the variable genetic penetrance will blaze the trail for genetic counseling and evaluating of the relatives of the variant carriers. In conclusion, our observations indicated that FBN1 may be a susceptibility gene for CS, expanding our knowledge to the existing list of predisposition and candidate genes in CS phenotypes. It remains unknown why distinct mutations in the FBN1 gene can convey a variable continuum of skeletal disorders, ranging from the overlapping features to discordant phenotypes. Future studies focusing on exploring the underlying mechanisms of pleiotropic effects of FBN1 may be warranted. Table S1 Table S2 Figure S1 Figure S2
  45 in total

1.  An analysis of PAX1 in the development of vertebral malformations.

Authors:  P F Giampietro; C L Raggio; C E Reynolds; S K Shukla; E McPherson; N Ghebranious; F S Jacobsen; V Kumar; T Faciszewski; R M Pauli; K Rasmussen; J K Burmester; C Zaleski; S Merchant; D David; J L Weber; I Glurich; R D Blank
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  Congenital scoliosis: a review and update.

Authors:  Daniel Hedequist; John Emans
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Congenital vertebral anomalies: aetiology and relationship to spina bifida cystica.

Authors:  R Wynne-Davies
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Vertebrate segmentation: from cyclic gene networks to scoliosis.

Authors:  Olivier Pourquié
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  A mechanism for gene-environment interaction in the etiology of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Duncan B Sparrow; Gavin Chapman; Allanceson J Smith; Muhammad Z Mattar; Joelene A Major; Victoria C O'Reilly; Yumiko Saga; Elaine H Zackai; John P Dormans; Benjamin A Alman; Lesley McGregor; Ryoichiro Kageyama; Kenro Kusumi; Sally L Dunwoodie
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Bi-allelic loss of function variants of TBX6 causes a spectrum of malformation of spine and rib including congenital scoliosis and spondylocostal dysostosis.

Authors:  Nao Otomo; Kazuki Takeda; Shunsuke Kawai; Ikuyo Kou; Long Guo; Mitsujiro Osawa; Cantas Alev; Noriaki Kawakami; Noriko Miyake; Naomichi Matsumoto; Yukuto Yasuhiko; Toshiaki Kotani; Teppei Suzuki; Koki Uno; Hideki Sudo; Satoshi Inami; Hiroshi Taneichi; Hideki Shigematsu; Kei Watanabe; Ikuho Yonezawa; Ryo Sugawara; Yuki Taniguchi; Shohei Minami; Kazuo Kaneko; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Junya Toguchida; Kota Watanabe; Shiro Ikegawa
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Abnormalities associated with congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of 226 Chinese surgical cases.

Authors:  Jianxiong Shen; Zijia Wang; Jiaming Liu; Xuhong Xue; Guixing Qiu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  TBX6-associated congenital scoliosis (TACS) as a clinically distinguishable subtype of congenital scoliosis: further evidence supporting the compound inheritance and TBX6 gene dosage model.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Nan Wu; Nan Yang; Kazuki Takeda; Weisheng Chen; Weiyu Li; Renqian Du; Sen Liu; Yangzhong Zhou; Ling Zhang; Zhenlei Liu; Yuzhi Zuo; Sen Zhao; Robert Blank; Davut Pehlivan; Shuangshuang Dong; Jianguo Zhang; Jianxiong Shen; Nuo Si; Yipeng Wang; Gang Liu; Shugang Li; Yanxue Zhao; Hong Zhao; Yixin Chen; Yu Zhao; Xiaofei Song; Jianhua Hu; Mao Lin; Ye Tian; Bo Yuan; Keyi Yu; Yuchen Niu; Bin Yu; Xiaoxin Li; Jia Chen; Zihui Yan; Qiankun Zhu; Xiaolu Meng; Xiaoli Chen; Jianzhong Su; Xiuli Zhao; Xiaoyue Wang; Yue Ming; Xiao Li; Cathleen L Raggio; Baozhong Zhang; Xisheng Weng; Shuyang Zhang; Xue Zhang; Kota Watanabe; Morio Matsumoto; Li Jin; Yiping Shen; Nara L Sobreira; Jennifer E Posey; Philip F Giampietro; David Valle; Pengfei Liu; Zhihong Wu; Shiro Ikegawa; James R Lupski; Feng Zhang; Guixing Qiu
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Congenital scoliosis: an up-to-date.

Authors:  G Burnei; S Gavriliu; C Vlad; I Georgescu; R A Ghita; C Dughilă; E M Japie; A Onilă
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  ptk7 mutant zebrafish models of congenital and idiopathic scoliosis implicate dysregulated Wnt signalling in disease.

Authors:  Madeline Hayes; Xiaochong Gao; Lisa X Yu; Nandina Paria; R Mark Henkelman; Carol A Wise; Brian Ciruna
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  11 in total

1.  Identification of Copy Number Variants in a Southern Chinese Cohort of Patients with Congenital Scoliosis.

Authors:  Wenjing Lai; Xin Feng; Ming Yue; Prudence W H Cheung; Vanessa N T Choi; You-Qiang Song; Keith D K Luk; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Bo Gao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 2.  [Latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Marfan syndrome].

Authors:  Shu-Ting Yang; Fang Luo
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Exome Sequencing Reveals De Novo Variants in Congenital Scoliosis.

Authors:  Kohei Murakami; Shingo Kikugawa; Shoji Seki; Hidetomi Terai; Takako Suzuki; Masaki Nakano; Jun Takahashi; Yukio Nakamura
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 4.  Congenital scoliosis: a narrative review and proposal of a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Mohammad Daher; Bendy Salameh; Ali Ghoul; Samuel George; Sami Roukoz
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Whole-genome methylation analysis reveals novel epigenetic perturbations of congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Hengqiang Zhao; Zihui Yan; Sen Zhao; Yuchen Niu; Xiaoxin Li; Shengru Wang; Yang Yang; Sen Liu; Terry Jianguo Zhang; Zhihong Wu; Nan Wu
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 8.886

6.  Variants Affecting the C-Terminal of CSF1R Cause Congenital Vertebral Malformation Through a Gain-of-Function Mechanism.

Authors:  Bowen Liu; Sen Zhao; Zihui Yan; Lina Zhao; Jiachen Lin; Shengru Wang; Yuchen Niu; Xiaoxin Li; Guixing Qiu; Terry Jianguo Zhang; Zhihong Wu; Nan Wu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-19

7.  Genome-Wide Analysis of circular RNAs and validation of hsa_circ_0006719 as a potential novel diagnostic biomarker in congenital scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Jianxiong Shen; Chong Chen; Yang Jiao; Zheng Li; Haining Tan; Youxi Lin; Tianhua Rong
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Mutational burden and potential oligogenic model of TBX6-mediated genes in congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Sen Zhao; Yuanqiang Zhang; Shengru Wang; Jiashen Shao; Bowen Liu; Yaqi Li; Zihui Yan; Yuchen Niu; Xiaoxin Li; Lianlei Wang; Yongyu Ye; Xisheng Weng; Zhihong Wu; Jianguo Zhang; Nan Wu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Proof-of-Concept: Antisense Oligonucleotide Mediated Skipping of Fibrillin-1 Exon 52.

Authors:  Jessica M Cale; Kane Greer; Sue Fletcher; Steve D Wilton
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  CRISPR/Cas9 in zebrafish: An attractive model for FBN1 genetic defects in humans.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Yin; Jianxiu Hao; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.