| Literature DB >> 31826148 |
Uğur Topal1, Nuri Emrah Göret2, Ceren Canbey Göret3, Ömer Faruk Özkan4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of garlic on formation of postoperative adhesions in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31826148 PMCID: PMC6907884 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020190100000002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Cir Bras ISSN: 0102-8650 Impact factor: 1.388
Figure 1Creation of punctate hemorrhage in the cecum by cecal abrasion after laparotomy.
Histopathological scoring table.
| Score | Fibrosis | Inflammation | Masson Tricrom | SOD1, CAT, GSTP1, GLUT RED (Immunohistochemistry) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | None | None | None | None |
| 1 | Mild | Mild | Mild | Mild |
| 2 | Significant | Significant | Significant | Significant |
| 3 | Intense | Intense | Intense | Intense |
Figure 2On the left, Score 3 fibrosis, intense (score 2) inflammation with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E x100). On the right, Intense (score 3) fibrosis with Masson's Trichrome (Histochemistry x100).
Kruskal wallis test analysis.
| Fibrosis | Fibrosis with Masson's trichrome | Inflammation | Lymph node size | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Rank | x2 | p* | Mean Rank | x2 | p* | Mean Rank | x2 | p* | Mean Rank | x2 | p* | |
| Group 1 | 6.50 | 9.088 |
| 6.88 | 8.979 |
| 6.75 | 9.503 |
| 6.50 | 9.088 |
|
| Group 2 | 15.44 | 14.19 | 13.69 | 15.44 | ||||||||
| Group 3 | 15.56 | 16.44 | 17.06. | 15.56 | ||||||||
Histopathological evaluation of the study groups.
| Groups | Fibrosis | Fibrosis with Masson's trichrome | Inflammation | Lymph node size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1-2 | P 0.018 | P 0.018 | P 0.026 | P 0.010 |
| Group 1-3 | P 0.003 | P 0.003 | P 0.003 | P 0.008 |
| Group 2-3 | P 0.483 | P 0.483 | P 0.179 | P 1.000 |
P <0.05, pair-group analysis was evaluated via the Mann-Whitney U test.
** Group 1: sham group, group 2: control group, group 3: experimental group.
*** Lymph node size was microscopically measured in the histopathological examination in mm.
Results of comparison with immunohistochemical score groups.
| Groups | F | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | Group C | |||
| Immunohistochemical score | 1.75+2.37 | 5.25+1.03 | 6.0+2.07 | 11.227 |
|
Comparison between the groups with respect to the immunohistochemical score and the number of lymph nodes.
| Groups | Number of lymph nodes | Immunohistochemical score |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1-2 | 1.000 | 0.004 |
| Group 1-3 | 1.000 | 0.001 |
| Group 2-3 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
The mean difference is significant at the level of 0.15.
** Post hoc pair-group analysis was performed using Bonferroni correction.
*** Statistical evaluation between the three groups was assessed with one-way ANOVA.
**** Each immunohistochemical marker was individually scored, but statistical evaluation was performed for each rat on the basis of the total score (SOD-1, CAT, GSTP-1, Glut Red).
***** In the histopathological examination, the number of lymph nodes was microscopically counted for each rat.
Figure 3A. Intense (Score 3) staining of adipose tissue with SOD 1 (IHC x40). B. Moderate positivity (Score 2) with GSTP 1 (IHC x400). C. Moderate positive (Score 2) staining with CAT (IHC x400). D. Light (Score 1) positive staining with GLUT RED (IHC x400).
Mean values of free oxygen radicals number of lymph nodes.
| Groups | Number of lymph nodes | Free oxygen radicals with immunohistochemical |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Mean: 3.63 | Mean: 1.7500 |
| St. deviation: 1.923 | St. deviation: 2.37547 | |
| Median: 4 | Median: 1.00 | |
| Group 2 | Mean: 3.75 | Mean: 5.2500 |
| St. deviation: 1.753 | St. deviation: 1.03510 | |
| Median: 4 | Median: 5 | |
| Group 3 | Mean: 4.00 | Mean: 4.3333 |
| St. deviation: 2.449 | St. deviation: 2.63202 | |
| Median: 3.50 | Median: 4.50 | |
* The mean difference is significant at the level of 0.15.
** Post hoc pair-group analysis was performed using Bonferroni correction.
*** Statistical evaluation between the three groups was assessed with one-way ANOVA.
**** Each immunohistochemical marker was individually scored, but statistical evaluation was performed for each rat on the basis of the total score (SOD-1, CAT, GSTP-1, Glut Red).
***** In the histopathological examination, the number of lymph nodes was microscopically counted for each rat.