| Literature DB >> 31824720 |
Hao Zhang1,2, Zheng Duan3, Yiyun Li3, Guangyu Zhao3, Shiming Zhu3, Wei Fu3, Ting Peng4, Quanzhi Zhao4, Sune Svanberg3,5, Jiandong Hu1,2.
Abstract
Nitrogen is one of the most important nutrient indicators for the growth of crops, and is closely related to the chlorophyll content of leaves and thus influences the photosynthetic ability of the crops. In this study, five hybrid rice varieties were cultivated during one entire growing period in one experimental field supplied with six nitrogen fertilizer levels. Visible and near infrared (vis/NIR) reflectance spectroscopy combined with multivariate analysis was used to identify hybrid rice varieties and nitrogen fertilizer levels, as well as to detect chlorophyll content associated with nitrogen levels. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was applied to identify five varieties of hybrid rice and six levels of nitrogen fertilizer. The results demonstrated that different varieties of hybrid rice for each nitrogen level can be well distinguished except for the highest nitrogen level, and no nitrogen level for each rice variety can be completely identified from the other five nitrogen levels. Further, 12 spectral indices combined with partial least square (PLS) analysis were applied for estimating chlorophyll content of rice leaves from plants subjected to different nitrogen levels, and a root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV) of 0.506, a coefficient of determination (R 2) of 97.8% and a ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) of 4.6 for all rice varieties indicated this as a preferable procedure. This study demonstrates that Vis/NIR spectroscopy can have a great potential for identification of rice varieties and evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer levels.Entities:
Keywords: Vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy; chlorophyll content; nitrogen fertilizer level; partial least square; support vector machine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31824720 PMCID: PMC6837182 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Hybrid rice varieties and their parent cultivars.
| sample name | male parent | female parent |
|---|---|---|
| LiangYouPeiJiu (LYPJ) | R9311 | PA64S |
| YLiangYou 1 (YLY1) | R9311 | Y58S |
| YLiangYou 2 (YLY2) | YuanHui2 | Y58S |
| YLiangYou 900 (YLY900) | R900 | Y58S |
| ChaoYou 1000 (CY1000) | R900 | GuangXiang24S |
Spectral indices used in this work.
| index | formula | reference |
|---|---|---|
| SR(750,550) | [ | |
| SR(750,700) | [ | |
| SR(800,670) | [ | |
| RMI | [ | |
| GMI | [ | |
| NDVI1 | [ | |
| NDVI2 | [ | |
| MCARI1 | [ | |
| MCARI2 | [ | |
| TVI | [ | |
| MTVI1 | [ | |
| MTVI2 | [ |
Figure 1.Reflectance spectra of five hybrid rice varieties without nitrogen application (N1) (a) before and (b) after preprocessing. Reflectance spectra of LYPJ hybrid rice with different nitrogen application levels before (c) and after preprocessing (d).
Classification results of hybrid rice varieties for each nitrogen level based on the SVM model.
| LYPJ | YLY1 | YLY2 | YLY900 | CY1000 | total RCR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | ||
| N1 | 100% | 100% | 71.4% | 100% | 87.5% | 100% | 100% | 90.3% | 100% | 100% | 91.8% |
| N2 | 100% | 100% | 71.4% | 80.7% | 50% | 93.3% | 28.6% | 93.6% | 100% | 100% | 70% |
| N3 | 87.5% | 100% | 100% | 93.6% | 50% | 100% | 85.7% | 100% | 100% | 86.7% | 84.6% |
| N4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 85.7% | 93.6% | 37.5% | 96.7% | 84.6% |
| N5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 96.7% | 85.7% | 93.6% | 100% | 100% | 92.1% |
| N6 | 50% | 96.7% | 85.7% | 90.3% | 87.5% | 86.7% | 42.9% | 96.8% | 62.5% | 96.7% | 65.7% |
| average | 89.6% | 99.5% | 88.1% | 94.1% | 75% | 94.5% | 71.4% | 94.6% | 83.3% | 96.7% | |
Classification results of six nitrogen levels for each rice variety based on SVM model.
| N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | N5 | N6 | total RCR | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | RCR | RJR | ||
| LYPJ | 100% | 97.8% | 71.4% | 95.6% | 62.5% | 97.8% | 14.3% | 93.3% | 62.5% | 82.2% | 100% | 100% | 68.5% |
| YLY1 | 87.5% | 97.8% | 57.1% | 88.9% | 87.5% | 93.3% | 14.3% | 100% | 50% | 91.1% | 57.1% | 88.9% | 58.9% |
| YLY2 | 87.5% | 95.6% | 85.7% | 97.8% | 25% | 95.6% | 57.2% | 95.6% | 50% | 86.7% | 57.1% | 88.9% | 60.4% |
| YLY900 | 87.5% | 95.6% | 42.9% | 95.6% | 87.5% | 97.8% | 42.9% | 93.3% | 12.5% | 95.6% | 57.1% | 84.4% | 55.1% |
| CY1000 | 87.5% | 93.3% | 14.3% | 88.9% | 12.5% | 95.6% | 42.9% | 86.7% | 100% | 100% | 85.7% | 95.6% | 57.1% |
| average | 90% | 96% | 54.3% | 93.3% | 55% | 96% | 34.3% | 93.8% | 55% | 91.1% | 71.4% | 91.6% | |
Average and standard deviation of measured SPAD values.
| LYPJ | YLY1 | YLY2 | YLY900 | CY1000 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| average | s.d. | average | s.d. | average | s.d. | average | s.d. | average | s.d. | |
| N1 | 39.62 | 1.49 | 40.69 | 0.84 | 32.81 | 4.16 | 41.54 | 2.90 | 41.53 | 1.39 |
| N2 | 44.85 | 2.10 | 45.07 | 2.02 | 39.84 | 3.93 | 42.49 | 1.59 | 42.39 | 1.48 |
| N3 | 45.12 | 1.77 | 45.23 | 2.49 | 39.09 | 2.55 | 44.09 | 2.89 | 42.51 | 2.24 |
| N4 | 45.61 | 2.13 | 45.57 | 1.91 | 40.74 | 2.34 | 45.31 | 1.04 | 42.97 | 2.99 |
| N5 | 45.18 | 2.23 | 46.57 | 1.24 | 41.37 | 0.87 | 45.46 | 2.41 | 45.56 | 5.69 |
| N6 | 47.15 | 0.99 | 44.45 | 1.74 | 41.5 | 2.36 | 45.52 | 3.07 | 44.93 | 2.56 |
Figure 2.Relationship between spectral indices (RMI and GMI) and the SPAD value of different rice varieties.
Figure 3.Relationship between measured and predicted SPAD based on 12 spectral indices. (a) LYP9, (b) LYL1, (c) LYL2, (d) YLY900, (e) CY1000 and (f) all rice varieties. The blue solid line represents the fitting curve, and the red dash line denotes the 1 : 1 line.
Figure 4.Vertical distribution of RMI for five rice varieties with six different nitrogen fertilizer levels.