| Literature DB >> 27350029 |
Jian Yang1, Wei Gong1,2, Shuo Shi1,2, Lin Du1,3, Jia Sun1, Shalei Song4, Biwu Chen1, Zhenbing Zhang1.
Abstract
Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) is a significant factor which can be utilized to monitor the status of paddy rice and it requires a reliable approach for fast and precise quantification. This investigation aims to quantitatively analyze the correlation between fluorescence parameters and LNC based on laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) technology. The fluorescence parameters exhibited a consistent positive linear correlation with LNC in different growing years (2014 and 2015) and different rice cultivars. The R(2) of the models varied from 0.6978 to 0.9045. Support vector machine (SVM) was then utilized to verify the feasibility of the fluorescence parameters for monitoring LNC. Comparison of the fluorescence parameters indicated that F740 is the most sensitive (the R(2) of linear regression analysis of the between predicted and measured values changed from 0.8475 to 0.9226, and REs ranged from 3.52% to 4.83%) to the changes in LNC among all fluorescence parameters. Experimental results demonstrated that fluorescence parameters based on LIF technology combined with SVM is a potential method for realizing real-time, non-destructive monitoring of paddy rice LNC, which can provide guidance for the decision-making of farmers in their N fertilization strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27350029 PMCID: PMC4923903 DOI: 10.1038/srep28787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Normalized fluorescence spectra of paddy rice leaf (normalized to 1 at the 460 nm) with different LNCs (the LNCs range from 2.5 mg/g to 4.0 mg/g).
Figure 2Contour maps for coefficients of determination (R2) between paddy rice leaf nitrogen content and fluorescence ratios in different growing years.
2014 (n = 324) (a); 2015 (n = 216) (b).
Figure 3The relationships between fluorescence parameters (F685 (a,d); F740 (b,e); F740/F685 (c,f)) and paddy rice leaf nitrogen content (growing seasons (a–c); cultivars (d–f)). The red solid line denotes the regressive line for all experimental data.
Figure 4The relationship between the predicted LNC by using SVM based on different fluorescence parameters (F685 (a,d); F740 (b,e); F740/F685 (c,f)) and observed LNC for the three paddy rice cultivars and two growing seasons. The dotted line denotes the 1:1 line.
Quantitative relationship of paddy rice leaf nitrogen content (y) to individual fluorescence parameter (x) for the three paddy rice cultivars and two growing years.
| F685 vs. LNC | F740 vs. LNC | F740/F685 vs. LNC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | 2014 | |||
| Eq. | y = 1.271x + 2.256 | y = 0.953x + 2.189 | y = 1.93x + 0.362 | |
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1244 | 0.1186 | 0.1427 | |
| 0.8658 | 0.9045 | 0.842 | ||
| 2015 | ||||
| Eq. | y = 0.908x + 2.586 | y = 0.711x + 2.497 | y = 1.53x + 1.126 | |
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.07206 | 0.0671 | 0.09697 | |
| 0.7811 | 0.8362 | 0.6978 | ||
| Cultivars | Japonica rice | |||
| Eq. | y = 1.241x + 2.277 | y = 0.923x + 2.18 | y = 1.916x + 0.365 | |
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1336 | 0.1122 | 0.1475 | |
| 0.8301 | 0.8925 | 0.806 | ||
| Hsien rice | ||||
| Eq. | y = 1.295x + 2.241 | y = 0.94x + 2.207 | y = 1.93x + 0.378 | |
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1132 | 0.1277 | 0.1389 | |
| 0.8421 | 0.8635 | 0.825 | ||
| Yangliangyou 6 | ||||
| Eq. | y = 0.94x + 2.56 | y = 0.707x + 2.488 | y = 1.474x + 1.216 | |
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.07462 | 0.06211 | 0.09027 | |
| 0.8084 | 0.8415 | 0.7239 | ||
Linear regression analysis between the predicted using SVM and observed LNC for the three cultivars and two growing years based on the different fluorescence parameters (F685, F740, and F740/F685).
| F685 vs. LNC | F740 vs. LNC | F740/F685 vs. LNC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | 2014 | |||
| 0.8852 | 0.9226 | 0.8524 | ||
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1088 | 0.085 | 0.1538 | |
| RE (%) | 4.29 | 3.63 | 5.74 | |
| 2015 | ||||
| 0.8482 | 0.8629 | 0.7842 | ||
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1353 | 0.0647 | 0.0943 | |
| RE (%) | 5.95 | 4.53 | 7.72 | |
| Cultivars | Japonica rice | |||
| 0.8607 | 0.9094 | 0.8232 | ||
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1034 | 0.091 | 0.1617 | |
| RE (%) | 4.13 | 3.81 | 6.94 | |
| Hsien rice | ||||
| 0.8788 | 0.8941 | 0.8412 | ||
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.0913 | 0.1081 | 0.1508 | |
| RE (%) | 3.91 | 3.52 | 5.69 | |
| Yangliangyou 6 | ||||
| 0.8249 | 0.8529 | 0.8064 | ||
| RMSE (mg/g) | 0.1297 | 0.1049 | 0.1876 | |
| RE (%) | 5.46 | 4.83 | 8.08 | |