| Literature DB >> 31824559 |
Qian Wang1,2, Kaiqiang Liu1,2, Bo Feng1,3, Zhihua Zhang1,3, Renkai Wang1,2, Lili Tang1,2, Wensheng Li4, Qiye Li5, Francesc Piferrer6, Changwei Shao1,2.
Abstract
The sex of Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) is determined by both genetic sex determination (GSD) and environmental sex determination (ESD), making it an ideal model to study the relationship between sex-determination and temperature. In the present study, transcriptomes of undifferentiated gonads from genetic females and males, as well as differentiated gonads from males, females, and pseudomales under high and normal temperature treatments were generated for comparative transcriptomic analysis. A mean of 68.24 M high-quality clean reads was obtained for each library. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different sexes and environmental treatments were identified, revealing that the heat shock protein gene family was involved in the high temperature induced sex reversal. The Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways that were enriched in pseudomale and genetic female comparison included neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, cortisol synthesis and secretion, and steroid hormone biosynthesis. Furthermore, weighted gene co-expression network analyses were conducted on all samples, and two modules were positive correlated with pseudomale under high temperature. An illustrated protein-protein interaction map of the module identified a hub gene, hsc70. These findings provide insights into the genetic network that is involved in sex determination and sexual differentiation, and improve our understanding of genes involved in sex reversal under high temperature.Entities:
Keywords: Cynoglossus semilaevis; environmental sex reversal; high temperature; sex differentiation; transcriptome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31824559 PMCID: PMC6882949 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Number of differentially expressed genes. DEGs identified from each comparison groups. Red and blue indicate up-regulated genes and down-regulated genes, respectively.
Figure 2Analysis of DEGs between females and males. (A) Number of DEGs between females and males shown by Venn diagram. (B) GO classifications of 943 DEGs belong to C22_F vs C22_M and C28_F vs C28_M excluding 30dpf_F vs 30dpf_M. (C) Enriched KEGG pathways of the 943 DEGs (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Analysis of DEGs in females, males, and pseudomales between high temperature and normal temperature. (A) Number of DEGs between high temperature and normal temperature shown by Venn diagram. (B) GO classifications of 534 DEGs in females, males and pseudomales between high temperature and normal temperature. (C) Enriched KEGG pathways of the 534 DEGs (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Gene expression patterns in pseudomale formed under high temperature and normal temperature. (A) Number of DEGs shown by Venn diagram. (B) Heatmaps showing the expression of DEGs found both in C22_P vs 30dpf_F and C28_P vs 30dpf_F (red: higher expression, blue: lower expression). (C) Enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs up-regulated in C28_P compared to C22_P (q < 0.05). (D) Enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs down-regulated in C28_P compared to C22_P (q < 0.05), graph showing top 20 significant terms.
Figure 5WGCNA and functional analysis of pseudomale-related modules. (A) The relationship between 6 modules across all samples by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA). The color bar indicates correlation value from low (blue) to high (red). (B, D) Enriched KEGG pathways of genes in the blue module (B) and yellow module (D) (q < 0.05). (C, E) The network relationship in the blue module (C) and yellow module (E).