| Literature DB >> 31823761 |
Yasmine Maher Shaaban1,2,3, Tamer Abdel Fattah Badran4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUN: To evaluate the effect of oral contraceptive pills (OCP) on the macula, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and the choroidal thickness (CT).Entities:
Keywords: Choroid; Ganglion; Macula; Nerve fiber; Ocular coherence tomography; Oral contraceptive
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31823761 PMCID: PMC6904990 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1263-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Demographic data for oral contraceptive pills group and the control group
| Parameter | OCP Group ( | Control Group ( | t | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 30.48 ± 3.4 | 29.97 ± 3.87 | 0.777 | 0.444 |
| Gender | female | female | ||
| Number of subjects | 30 | 30 | ||
| Ethnicity | Egyptians | Egyptians | ||
| Study location | Cairo, Egypt | Cairo, Egypt | ||
| BMI. kg/m2 | 23.3 + 2.2 | 22.3 + 2.3 | 1.818 | 0.074 |
OCP Oral contraceptive pills, BMI Body Mass Index, Values are expressed as mean ± SD. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant
Comparison of macular and choroidal thickness in women using oral contraceptive pills and the control group
| Parameter (μm) | OCP group ( | Control group ( | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| MACULA | ||||
| Central subfield | 242.75 ± 10.22 | 268.13 ± 11.86 | 12.556 | < 0.001 |
| Superior inner macula | 293.88 ± 10.48 | 308.95 ± 10.94 | 7.704 | < 0.001 |
| Temporal inner macula | 295.48 ± 7.58 | 307.85 ± 9.61 | 7.828 | < 0.001 |
| Inferior inner macula | 295.63 ± 8.52 | 310.57 ± 11.06 | 8.288 | < 0.001 |
| Nasal inner macula | 298.95 ± 10.31 | 314.57 ± 7.89 | 9.316 | < 0.001 |
| Average inner macula | 296.0 ± 8.05 | 310.48 ± 7.94 | 9.922 | < 0.001 |
| Superior outer macula | 269.13 ± 8.49 | 282.97 ± 11.31 | 7.577 | < 0.001 |
| Temporal outer macula | 271.68 ± 15.43 | 284.45 ± 11.59 | 5.124 | < 0.001 |
| Inferior outer macula | 268.05 ± 7.44 | 286.38 ± 10.40 | 11.108 | < 0.001 |
| Nasal outer macula | 271.93 ± 9.15 | 301.22 ± 13.33 | 14.031 | < 0.001 |
| Average outer macula | 270.2 ± 8.27 | 288.75 ± 8.71 | 11.962 | < 0.001 |
| Cube volume s (mm3) | 8.71 ± 0.50 | 10.05 ± 0.38 | 16.539 | < 0.001 |
| Cube average thickness | 273.52 ± 5.51 | 284.73 ± 6.18 | 10.496 | < 0.001 |
| CHOROID | ||||
| Temporal choroid | 219.87 ± 6.26 | 259.82 ± 14.50 | 19.595 | < 0.001 |
| sub foveal choroid | 233.98 ± 9.34 | 272.38 ± 15.50 | 16.433 | < 0.001 |
| Nasal choroid | 223.12 ± 7.12 | 260.23 ± 16.82 | 15.738 | < 0.001 |
| Average choroid | 225.66 ± 7.12 | 264.14 ± 14.75 | 18.2 | < 0.001 |
OCP Oral contraceptive pills. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant
Average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in women using oral contraceptive pills and the control group
| Parameter (μm) | OCP group ( | Control group ( | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| superior | 103.38 ± 9.97 | 121.22 ± 7.20 | 11.232 | < 0.001 |
| Temporal | 59.83 ± 7.22 | 75.60 ± 11.60 | 8.937 | < 0.001 |
| inferior | 112.28 ± 14.80 | 133.72 ± 7.01 | 10.137 | < 0.001 |
| Nasal | 73.05 ± 9.93 | 99.67 ± 11.42 | 13.624 | < 0.001 |
| Average | 87.14 ± 8.77 | 107.55 ± 5.00 | 15.661 | < 0.001 |
OCP Oral contraceptive pills. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant
Average Ganglion cell layer thickness in women using oral contraceptive pills and the control group
| Parameter (μm) | OCP group ( | Control group ( | t | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
| superior | 76.07 ± 7.59 | 86.78 ± 4.88 | 9.201 | < 0.001 |
| Superior Temporal | 76.07 ± 6.97 | 87.05 ± 4.98 | 9.928 | < 0.001 |
| Inferior Temporal | 76.38 ± 6.69 | 87.93 ± 4.07 | 11.428 | < 0.001 |
| Inferior | 75.80 ± 6.67 | 87.38 ± 4.20 | 11.386 | < 0.001 |
| Inferior Nasal | 76.35 ± 7.30 | 88.05 ± 3.84 | 10.987 | < 0.001 |
| Superior Nasal | 76.55 ± 7.00 | 87.55 ± 3.60 | 10.830 | < 0.001 |
| Average | 76.20 ± 6.68 | 87.46 ± 3.40 | 11.631 | < 0.001 |
OCP Oral contraceptive pills. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant