Literature DB >> 26559368

Defining Rates and Risk Factors for Readmissions Following Emergency General Surgery.

Joaquim M Havens1, Olubode A Olufajo1, Zara R Cooper1, Adil H Haider2, Adil A Shah3, Ali Salim1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hospital readmission rates following surgery are increasingly being used as a marker of quality of care and are used in pay-for-performance metrics. To our knowledge, comprehensive data on readmissions to the initial hospital or a different hospital after emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures do not exist.
OBJECTIVE: To define readmission rates and identify risk factors for readmission after common EGS procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing EGS, as defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, were identified in the California State Inpatient Database (2007-2011) on January 15, 2015. Patients were 18 years and older. We identified the 5 most commonly performed EGS procedures in each of 11 EGS diagnosis groups. Patient demographics (sex, age, race/ethnicity, and insurance type) as well as Charlson Comorbidity Index score, length of stay, complications, and discharge disposition were collected. Factors associated with readmission were determined using multivariate logistic regression models analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day hospital readmission.
RESULTS: Among 177,511 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 57.1% were white, 48.8% were privately insured, and most were 45 years and older (51.3%). Laparoscopic appendectomy (35.2%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (19.3%) were the most common procedures. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 5.91%. Readmission rates ranged from 4.1% (upper gastrointestinal) to 16.8% (cardiothoracic). Of readmitted patients, 16.8% were readmitted at a different hospital. Predictors of readmission included Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or greater (adjusted odds ratio: 2.26 [95% CI, 2.14-2.39]), leaving against medical advice (adjusted odds ratio: 2.24 [95% CI, 1.89-2.66]), and public insurance (adjusted odds ratio: 1.55 [95% CI, 1.47-1.64]). The most common reasons for readmission were surgical site infections (16.9%), gastrointestinal complications (11.3%), and pulmonary complications (3.6%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Readmission after EGS procedures is common and varies widely depending on patient factors and diagnosis categories. One in 5 readmitted patients will go to a different hospital, causing fragmentation of care and potentially obscuring the utility of readmission as a quality metric. Assisting socially vulnerable patients and reducing postoperative complications, including infections, are targets to reduce readmissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26559368     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  28 in total

1.  Complete Impact of Care Fragmentation on Readmissions Following Urgent Abdominal Operations.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Yas Sanaiha; Usah Khrucharoen; Areti Tillou; Erik Dutson; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Beyond just the operating room: characterizing the complete caseload of a tertiary acute care surgery service.

Authors:  Theunis J van Zyl; Patrick B Murphy; Laura Allen; Neil G Parry; Ken Leslie; Kelly N Vogt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Risk factors for 30-day readmission after adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Paolo Goffredo; Imran Hassan; Sonia L Sugg; Geeta Lal; James R Howe; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  The association between self-declared acute care surgery services and critical care resources: Results from a national survey.

Authors:  Ashley M Tameron; Kevin B Ricci; Wendelyn M Oslock; Amy P Rushing; Angela M Ingraham; Vijaya T Daniel; Anghela Z Paredes; Adrian Diaz; Courtney E Collins; Victor K Heh; Holly E Baselice; Scott A Strassels; Heena P Santry
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 3.425

5.  Geographic Diffusion and Implementation of Acute Care Surgery: An Uneven Solution to the National Emergency General Surgery Crisis.

Authors:  Jasmine A Khubchandani; Angela M Ingraham; Vijaya T Daniel; Didem Ayturk; Catarina I Kiefe; Heena P Santry
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Defining Serious Illness Among Adult Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Katherine C Lee; Anne M Walling; Steven S Senglaub; Amy S Kelley; Zara Cooper
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Emergency department utilization and predictors of mortality for inpatient inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  Ambar Mehta; Susan Hutfless; Alex B Blair; Anirudh Dwarakanath; Chet I Wyman; Gina Adrales; Hien Tan Nguyen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Reversal of Coagulopathy in Emergency General Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Moustafa Younis; Mohamed Ray-Zack; Nadeem N Haddad; Asad Choudhry; Matthew C Hernandez; Kevin Wise; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Emergency department overutilization following cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Mark Mahan; Voranaddha Vacharathit; Alexandra Falvo; James Dove; David Parker; Jon Gabrielsen; Mustapha Daouadi; Mohsen Shabahang; Anthony Petrick; Ryan Horsley
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: Do Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Enrolled Patients Receive the Same Care?

Authors:  Amanda Fazzalari; Natalie Pozzi; David Alfego; Qiming Shi; Nathaniel Erskine; Gary Tourony; Jomol Mathew; Demetrius Litwin; Mitchell A Cahan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.