| Literature DB >> 31823264 |
Diego Esteban Gamboa-García1, Guillermo Duque2, Pilar Cogua3, José Luis Marrugo-Negrete4.
Abstract
The environmental health of Buenaventura Bay, a highly impacted tropical estuary, is influenced by numerous human activities, including mining upstream. Large- and small-scale fishing plays an important role in the local economy, so we investigated the dynamic processes of bioaccumulation of mercury at basal trophic levels. Four samples were taken at each of the four locations in Buenaventura Bay during each of the four seasons of 2015. We measured the total mercury content (T-Hg, dry weight) in sediments and in muscle tissue across 17 macroinvertebrate species. The most abundant were the blue crab (C. arcuatus) and the mantis shrimp (S. aculeata aculeata). Blue crab showed an average muscle T-Hg value exceeding the limit of 0.2 g·g-1, which is the maximum T-Hg level suggested for food consumption by vulnerable humans and populations: pregnant women, children, and the community that feeds from this source of protein on a daily basis. It was found that, 6.22% of individuals exceeded the 0.5 g·g-1 level, which is the maximum T-Hg level suggested for food consumption by the general population: the population that consumes it sporadically. Significantly high values of T-Hg in blue crab and mantis shrimp occurred during low salinity conditions in the estuary, suggesting that Hg mainly originates from river runoff during the rainy season. Nevertheless, the biota-sediment accumulation factor (BSAF) was favored in high salinity, which could mean greater availability of Hg for higher levels of the estuarine food web in the dry season and in marine waters. In general, the T-Hg levels in some samples exceeded 0.2 g·g-1. Therefore this pollutant must be monitored due to its biomagnification potential and as a threat to human health, especially that for the local population of fishermen and their families.Entities:
Keywords: Artisanal fisheries; Epibenthic invertebrates; Human health; Macroinvertebrates; Tropical estuary
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31823264 PMCID: PMC7024058 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06970-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Study area: Buenaventura Bay. RE River Estuary; IE Internal Estuary; EE External Estuary; ME Marine Estuary. Source: Adapted from SIGOT
Fig. 2T-Hg gradient map in the upper 5 cm of sediments (μg·g-1 dw) by season and location
Multiple regression analysis of sediment total Hg content in relation to environmental variables of sediment and water. Variables are reported in the order in which they entered the model, that is, in decreasing order by F value (p ≤ 0.05). The sign of the relation between T-Hg concentration and each environmental variable is represented by sign, and the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients are provided in parentheses. The level of significance to retain the variables in each model was p ≤ 0.05, except for the variables in italics, for which 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.15. Strong Pearson correlations are indicated in bold. All distributions Box-Cox transformed.
| 0.90 | (+)Gravels(0.60) | (+)Silt(0.40) | 51.9 | <0.001 | |||
| 0.40 | (−) Transparency(0.41) | (+)Depth(0.32) | 5.6 | 0.002 | |||
Means and standard deviations of T-Hg content (μg·g−1, dry weight) in macroinvertebrate muscle, where 0.2 μg·g−1 is the maximum T-Hg level suggested for food consumption by this vulnerable human population. The vulnerable population in this case refers to pregnant women, children, and the community that feeds from this source of protein on a daily basis; the general population is the population that consumes it sporadically. The maximum T-Hg level suggested for food consumption by the general population is 0.5 μg·g−1 (0.5 ppm).
| 4 | 0.273 | 0.059 | 0.359–0.234 | 100 | ||
| 1 | 0.255 | 100 | ||||
| 209 | 0.175 | 0.144 | 0.751–0.03 | 24.4 | 6.22 | |
| 17 | 0.086 | 0.022 | 0.13–0.053 | |||
| 33 | 0.084 | 0.036 | 0.196–0.045 | |||
| 9 | 0.075 | 0.032 | 0.143–0.035 | |||
| 1 | 0.07 | |||||
| 1 | 0.067 | |||||
| 2 | 0.06 | 0.012 | 0.069–0.052 | |||
| 5 | 0.058 | 0.024 | 0.08–0.03 | |||
| 15 | 0.056 | 0.021 | 0.114–0.035 | |||
| 3 | 0.055 | 0.019 | 0.076–0.04 | |||
| 4 | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.058–0.041 | |||
| 3 | 0.049 | 0.022 | 0.071–0.028 | |||
| 1 | 0.045 | |||||
| 1 | 0.02 | |||||
| 2 | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.024–0 | |||
Size-standardized average crab muscle T-Hg content of C. arcuatus by season and location, estimated by least squares (±SD). The letters read vertically indicate significant differences (Tukey) with a significant two-way interaction (p ≤ 0.05). Each average was calculated from a pool of samples for a total of 209 samples. RE = River Estuary, IE = Inner Estuary, EE = External Estuary, ME = Marine Estuary.
| 0.013 ± 0.004 C | ||
| 0.014 ± 0.003 C | ||
| 0.019 ± 0.006 C | ||
| 0.020 ± 0.003 C | ||
| 0.018 ± 0.005 C | ||
| 0.019 ± 0.015 C | ||
| 0.022 ± 0.013 BC | ||
| 0.025 ± 0.019 BC | ||
| 0.015 ± 0.005 C | ||
| 0.029 ± 0.014 AB | ||
| 0.037 ± 0.016 A | ||
| 0.033 ± 0.021 A | ||
| 0.032 ± 0.016 A |
Multiple regression analysis of total Hg content in macroinvertebrate muscle in relation to environmental parameters of sediment and water. Variables are reported in the order in which they entered the model, that is, in decreasing order by F value (p ≤ 0.05). The sign of the relation between T-Hg concentration and each environmental variable is represented by sign, and the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients are provided in parentheses. The level of significance to retain the variables in each model was p ≤ 0.05, except for the variables in italics, for which 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.15. Significant Pearson correlations are indicated in bold.
| 0.15 | 5.5 | 0.03 | |||||
| 0.23 | %Silt(−0.19) | 20.29 | 0.0001 | ||||
| 0.47 | 13.19 | 0.0001 | |||||
| 0.23 | [T-Hg] in sediments (+0.22) | Temperature(−0.14) | 15.2 | 0.0001 | |||
Average T-Hg content of Squilla aculeata aculeata muscle by season and location, estimated by least squares (±SD). The letters read vertically indicate significant differences (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05). Each average was calculated from a pool of samples for a total of 33 samples. RE = River Estuary, IE = Inner Estuary, EE = External Estuary, ME = Marine Estuary
| 0.060 ± 0.012 B | ||
| 0.060 ± 0.019 B | ||
| 0.068 ± 0.014 AB | ||
| 0.097 ± 0.010 AB | ||
| 0.080 ± 0.002 AB | ||
| 0.062 AB | ||
| 0.099 ± 0.027 A | ||
| 0.196 ± 0.043 A | ||
| 0.118 ± 0.043 A |