Literature DB >> 31823257

Assessment of the health risk related to exposure to ultrafine, fine, and total particulates and metals in a metal finishing plant.

Burcu Onat1, Nevran Sultan Çalışkan2, Ülkü Alver Şahin2, Burcu Uzun2.   

Abstract

The materials and byproducts of the processes used in the metal finishing industry are released as particle contaminants into the air in the workplace. The present study aimed to determine the concentrations and size distributions of these particles and of elements chromium, nickel, copper, manganese, cobalt, and lead (Cr, Ni, Cu, Mn, Co, and Pb, respectively) in a metal finishing industry and evaluate their potential health risks. Particles that are airborne from the dipping baths in the plant were sampled using a Sioutas cascade impactor at five different size fractions (PM>2.5, PM1.0-2.5, PM0.5-1.0, PM0.25-0.5, PM<0.25) and gravimetric analyses were conducted on the sampled filters. The GF-AAS 600 graphite atomic absorption spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the elements and the method of USEPA was used to assess the health risk. The ratio of fine particles (PM2.5) to total suspended particles (TSPs) was 0.6. We observed that 50% of TSPs were composed of PM1.0 and that 68-88% of the metals were found in the fine particle fractions. Pb, Cr, and Mn were significantly positively correlated in the PM1.0 fraction, and the highest linear relationship was found between Pb and Cr (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). The total hazard quotient (HQ) for PM2.5 was 1.43, which is higher than the acceptable limit of 1.0. The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) for hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) in PM2.5 was 6.09 × 10-5 for female workers and 6.54 × 10-5 for male workers, which are higher than the acceptable limit of 1.0 × 10-6, while total ELCRs for female and male workers were 6.21 × 10-5 and 6.21 × 10-5, respectively. The lifetime cancer risk associated with Cr(VI) in Cr electroplating plants should be taken into consideration as a significant health risk for the workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromium; Electroplating; Exposure; Health risk; Metal finishing; Particle size distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31823257     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06891-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

Review 1.  Metalworking fluid--the toxicity of a complex mixture.

Authors:  Terry Gordon
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2004-02-13

2.  Nasal septum lesions and lung function in workers exposed to chromic acid in electroplating factories.

Authors:  H W Kuo; J S Lai; T I Lin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Metal(loid) bioaccessibility and inhalation risk assessment: A comparison between an urban and an industrial area.

Authors:  A Hernández-Pellón; W Nischkauer; A Limbeck; I Fernández-Olmo
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Occupational asthma due to chrome and nickel electroplating.

Authors:  P Bright; P S Burge; S P O'Hickey; P F Gannon; A S Robertson; A Boran
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Effect of genotoxic exposure to chromium among electroplating workers in Taiwan.

Authors:  F Y Wu; W Y Wu; H W Kuo; C S Liu; R Y Wang; J S Lai
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Urinary and plasma concentrations of nickel as indicators of exposure to nickel in an electroplating shop.

Authors:  S Tola; J Kilpiö; M Virtamo
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1979-03

7.  Assessment of fine particulate matter and gaseous pollutants in workplace atmosphere of metallic industry.

Authors:  Ülkü Alver Şahin; Birgül Kurutaş
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Occupational exposure to heavy metals: DNA damage induction and DNA repair inhibition prove co-exposures to cadmium, cobalt and lead as more dangerous than hitherto expected.

Authors:  Jan G Hengstler; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff; Andreas Faldum; Kai Janssen; Michael Reifenrath; Walter Götte; Detlev Jung; Otfried Mayer-Popken; Jürgen Fuchs; Susanne Gebhard; Heinz Günter Bienfait; Kirsten Schlink; Cornelia Dietrich; Dagmar Faust; Bernd Epe; Franz Oesch
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Dermal exposure to electroplating fluids and metalworking fluids in the UK.

Authors:  Martin Roff; David A Bagon; Helen Chambers; E Martin Dilworth; Nicholas Warren
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2004-04

10.  Chronic occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium causes DNA damage in electroplating workers.

Authors:  Xu-Hui Zhang; Xuan Zhang; Xu-Chu Wang; Li-Fen Jin; Zhang-Ping Yang; Cai-Xia Jiang; Qing Chen; Xiao-Bin Ren; Jian-Zhong Cao; Qiang Wang; Yi-Min Zhu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of airborne total suspended particulates and heavy metals in anodizing and electroplating surface treatment process.

Authors:  Donghyeon Kim; Sungyo Jung; Chungsik Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.