Literature DB >> 14681076

Metalworking fluid--the toxicity of a complex mixture.

Terry Gordon1.   

Abstract

Various chemicals are used in the manufacture of cooling and lubricating fluids and fall into the classes of straight, soluble, semisynthetic, and synthetic metalworking fluids. The diversity of chemicals and in-use contaminants makes the risk assessment of metalworking fluids quite difficult. Toxicologists have used a number of methods to evaluate the component(s) responsible for the adverse pulmonary effects of metal working fluid aerosols encountered in the workplace. Although investigators have studied the adverse effects of metalworking fluid chemicals alone and in combination, the majority of evidence strongly suggests that the microbial changes that occur in fluid composition, during use and storage in the workplace, are responsible for the pulmonary effects reported for workers exposed to metalworking fluid aerosols. This review discusses the methodologies used to examine the toxicity of the complex nature of modern metalworking fluids and the findings that point toward bacterial endotoxin as a major contributor to their adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14681076     DOI: 10.1080/15287390490266864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  9 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of microbial communities and quantification of Mycobacterium immunogenum in metal removal fluids and their associated biofilms.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wu; Alfred Franzblau; Chuanwu Xi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Flow Cytometry Is a Powerful Tool for Assessment of the Viability of Fungal Conidia in Metalworking Fluids.

Authors:  D Vanhauteghem; K Demeyere; N Callaert; A Boelaert; G Haesaert; K Audenaert; E Meyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Alterations in cardiomyocyte function after pulmonary treatment with stainless steel welding fume in rats.

Authors:  Risto Popstojanov; James M Antonini; Rebecca Salmen; Morgan Ye; Wen Zheng; Vincent Castranova; Desta B Fekedulegn; Hong Kan
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2014

4.  Cumulative PM(2.5) exposure and telomere length in workers exposed to welding fumes.

Authors:  Jason Y Y Wong; Immaculata De Vivo; Xihong Lin; David C Christiani
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2014

5.  Assessment of the health risk related to exposure to ultrafine, fine, and total particulates and metals in a metal finishing plant.

Authors:  Burcu Onat; Nevran Sultan Çalışkan; Ülkü Alver Şahin; Burcu Uzun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with environmental mycobacteria.

Authors:  William Beckett; Michael Kallay; Akshay Sood; Zhengfa Zuo; Donald Milton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Airway symptoms and biological markers in nasal lavage fluid in subjects exposed to metalworking fluids.

Authors:  Louise Fornander; Pål Graff; Karin Wåhlén; Kjell Ydreborg; Ulf Flodin; Per Leanderson; Mats Lindahl; Bijar Ghafouri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterization of Industrial Coolant Fluids and Continuous Ageing Monitoring by Wireless Node-Enabled Fiber Optic Sensors.

Authors:  Alexandros El Sachat; Anastasia Meristoudi; Christos Markos; Andreas Sakellariou; Aggelos Papadopoulos; Serafim Katsikas; Christos Riziotis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Evaluation of operational parameters role on the emission of fumes.

Authors:  Javad Sajedifar; Amir Hossein Kokabi; Somayeh Farhang Dehghan; Ahmad Mehri; Kamal Azam; Farideh Golbabaei
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.179

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.