| Literature DB >> 31822710 |
Javad Aminian-Dehkordi1, Seyyed Mohammad Mousavi2, Arezou Jafari3, Ivan Mijakovic4,5, Sayed-Amir Marashi6.
Abstract
Bacillus megaterium is a microorganism widely used in industrial biotechnology for production of enzymes and recombinant proteins, as well as in bioleaching processes. Precise understanding of its metabolism is essential for designing engineering strategies to further optimizeEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31822710 PMCID: PMC6904757 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55041-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction procedure. Using Mauve, homologous gene pairs were detected to identify the reactions with similar gene-reaction associations in genome-scale metabolic models of Bacillus species. After the comprehensive manual curation, the draft model was validated and refined using phenotyping experiments and the experimental data reported in the literature.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the reconstruction process used for the genome-scale metabolic network of Bacillus megaterium DSM319. (a) Based on genome alignment, 734 reactions of iMZ1055 were included in the reconstruction of the initial draft network. (b) The initial draft network was modified by performing several manual curation steps, utilization of Bacillus species GenBank genomes for multiple-alignment and further addition of relevant reactions to the model, and refining the model based on phenotyping data. Solid arrows represent the process direction and dotted lines relate to the operations that were performed based on the available data in public databases. “167 Reactions”, “174 Reactions” and “358 Reactions” refer to “the reactions that had at least one associated gene in COM and at least one associated gene in BMW”, “the reactions that were associated with some gene(s) of COM” and “the similar reactions that were present in the other four Bacillus GEMs”, respectively (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 3Results of in silico and phenotyping experiments based on growth on 69 different carbon sources (☑: Growth/True, ☒: No-Growth/False). The experimental results were obtained for Bacillus megaterium DSM319 based on the procedure given in the Materials and Methods.
Bacillus species genome-scale metabolic models overview.
| Model | Oh | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species name | ||||||
| Reactions | 1709 | 1112 | 1742 | 1443 | 1020 | 1762 |
| Metabolites | 1349 | 993 | 1456 | 1145 | 988 | 1141 |
| Genes | 1121 | 1055 | 1147 | 1103 | 844 | 1009 |
| Transport reactions | 190 | 196 | 290 | 205 | 232 | 176 |
| Refs. | This study | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
Figure 4Features of iJA1121, (a) distribution of iJA1121 and iMZ1055 reactions in different subsystems, (b) classification of reactions in iJA1121 based on the modifications, (c) modifications made to the draft network ranked in different subsystems. “No-change” refers to those reactions that were added directly from iMZ1055 based on homology. “Changed” represents those reactions that were added from iMZ1055 based on homology, but with alterations in their GPR associations, EC numbers and/or reversibility-type. “New” refers to those reactions which were newly added during the reconstruction process.
Simulation conditions for different B. m. DSM319 strains.
| Specific growth rate | Unit | DSM319 | MS941 | WH320 | WH323 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.106 | 0.11 | 0.426 | 0.096 | 0.107 | ||
| Glucose uptake rate | 1.52 | 1.62 | 5.17 | 1.31 | 1.53 | |
| Acetate uptake rate | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.6 | 0.17 | 0.16 | |
Figure 5Results of growth simulations under different glucose uptake fluxes. The linear equation intercept is forced to zero (Pearson R = 0.99, p-value = 1.2e-05).
Figure 6Comparison of biomass production flux obtained by FBA and experimental growth rate values. The linear equation intercept is forced to zero (Pearson R = 0.994, p-value = 1e-4).
Figure 7Comparison of biomass rate obtained by FBA and biomass dry cell experiments reported in the literature for different carbon sources including fructose, sucrose, lactose, glucose, starch, and maltose.
Figure 8(a) Schematic of the shikimate production pathway. (b) Growth behavior analysis for aroK knock out mutant on different carbon sources. Pearson correlation coefficients and the -log(p-value) represent the results of the comparison study between in silico results and experimental data. The dashed line indicates the minimum −log(p-value) which was obtained for starch uptake. (c) Shikimate production simulations for aroK knock out mutant under different carbon sources.
Figure 9Results of formaldehyde sensitivity simulations in B. megaterium and B. subtilis using iJA1121, iMZ1055, and iBSU1103. For the simulations, formaldehyde flux was raised in a step-wise manner.
Figure 10Comparison of FVA and suboptimal FVA simulations as well as 13C labeling experiments. Values in the figure are normalized with respect to the extracellular glucose uptake flux in percent. For a specific reaction, black values are the experimental 13C fluxes, blue values are the flux ranges obtained by FVA simulation and green values are intervals related to the suboptimal FVA simulation.
Metabolic reactions used to carry out the FVA simulations.
| No. | Reaction | Does the experimental value fall within the predicted interval? |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | G6P[c] ↔ F6P[c] | Yes |
| 2 | ATP[c] + GLC[c] → H[c] + ADP[c] + G6P[c] | Yes |
| 3 | 2PG[c] ↔ H2O[c] + PEP[c] | Yes |
| 4 | H[c] + ADP[c] + PEP[c] → PYR[c] + ATP[c] | Yes |
| 5 | E4P[c] + XUL5P[c] ↔ T3P1[c] + F6P[c] | Yes |
| 6 | T3P1[c] + S7P[c] ↔ E4P[c] + F6P[c] | Yes |
| 7 | 2PG[c] ↔ 3PG[c] | Yes |
| 8 | FDP[c] ↔ T3P2[c] + T3P1[c] | Yes |
| 9 | XUL5P[c] + R5P[c] ↔ T3P1[c] + S7P[c] | Yes |
| 10 | 2 OFER[c] + PYR[c] + COA[c] → 2 RFER[c] + ACCOA[c] + CO2[c] + 2 H[c] | Yes |
| 11 | ATP[c] + AC[c] + COA[c] ↔ ADP[c] + ACCOA[c] + PI[c] | Yes |
| 12 | PYR[c] + ATP[c] + HCO3[c] → H[c] + OA[c] + ADP[c] + PI[c] | No |
| 13 | H2O[c] + OA[c] + ACCOA[c] ↔ H[c] + COA[c] + CIT[c] | Yes |
| 14 | H2O[c] + FUM[c] ↔ MAL[c] | Yes |
| 15 | NAD[c] + MAL[c] → PYR[c] + NADH[c] + CO2[c] | Yes |
| 16 | ATP[c] + OA[c] → CO2[c] + ADP[c] + PEP[c] | Yes |
Figure 11The heatmap representing the results of the flux-sum values of different components including glycolytic intermediates, TCA cycle intermediates, amino acids, and lipids. The comparisons were conducted for different carbon sources. (b) Schematic of fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. (c) Results of flux-sum values of the lipids constituting biomass. (d) Results of flux-sum values of the lipids constituting biomass.