Literature DB >> 31822498

TBCRC 032 IB/II Multicenter Study: Molecular Insights to AR Antagonist and PI3K Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients with AR+ Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Brian D Lehmann1,2, Vandana G Abramson1,2, Melinda E Sanders3,4, Erica L Mayer5, Tufia C Haddad6, Rita Nanda7, Catherine Van Poznak8, Anna Maria Storniolo9, Julie R Nangia10, Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson3,4, Violeta Sanchez11, Kimberly N Johnson2, Richard G Abramson12, Sheau-Chiann Chen13, Yu Shyr13, Carlos L Arteaga14, Antonio C Wolff15, Jennifer A Pietenpol.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preclinical data demonstrating androgen receptor (AR)-positive (AR+) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to AR antagonists, and PI3K inhibition catalyzed an investigator-initiated, multi-institutional phase Ib/II study TBCRC032. The trial investigated the safety and efficacy of the AR-antagonist enzalutamide alone or in combination with the PI3K inhibitor taselisib in patients with metastatic AR+ (≥10%) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase Ib patients [estrogen receptor positive (ER+) or TNBC] with AR+ breast cancer received 160 mg enzalutamide in combination with taselisib to determine dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase II TNBC patients were randomized to receive either enzalutamide alone or in combination with 4 mg taselisib until disease progression. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks.
RESULTS: The combination was tolerated, and the MTD was not reached. The adverse events were hyperglycemia and skin rash. Overall, CBR for evaluable patients receiving the combination was 35.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months. Luminal AR (LAR) TNBC subtype patients trended toward better response compared with non-LAR (75.0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.06), and increased PFS (4.6 vs. 2.0 months, P = 0.082). Genomic analyses revealed subtype-specific treatment response, and novel FGFR2 fusions and AR splice variants.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of enzalutamide and taselisib increased CBR in TNBC patients with AR+ tumors. Correlative analyses suggest AR protein expression alone is insufficient for identifying patients with AR-dependent tumors and knowledge of tumor LAR subtype and AR splice variants may identify patients more or less likely to benefit from AR antagonists. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31822498      PMCID: PMC7196503          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  46 in total

1.  Genomic Aberrations that Activate D-type Cyclins Are Associated with Enhanced Sensitivity to the CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib.

Authors:  Xueqian Gong; Lacey M Litchfield; Yue Webster; Li-Chun Chio; Swee Seong Wong; Trent R Stewart; Michele Dowless; Jack Dempsey; Yi Zeng; Raquel Torres; Karsten Boehnke; Cecilia Mur; Carlos Marugán; Carmen Baquero; Chunping Yu; Steven M Bray; Isabella H Wulur; Chen Bi; Shaoyou Chu; Hui-Rong Qian; Philip W Iversen; Farhana F Merzoug; Xiang S Ye; Christoph Reinhard; Alfonso De Dios; Jian Du; Charles W Caldwell; María José Lallena; Richard P Beckmann; Sean G Buchanan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline.

Authors:  Geraldine A Van der Auwera; Mauricio O Carneiro; Christopher Hartl; Ryan Poplin; Guillermo Del Angel; Ami Levy-Moonshine; Tadeusz Jordan; Khalid Shakir; David Roazen; Joel Thibault; Eric Banks; Kiran V Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2013

3.  Androgen deprivation-induced NCoA2 promotes metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Qin; Hui-Ju Lee; San-Pin Wu; Shih-Chieh Lin; Rainer B Lanz; Chad J Creighton; Francesco J DeMayo; Sophia Y Tsai; Ming-Jer Tsai
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fabrice André; Eva Ciruelos; Gabor Rubovszky; Mario Campone; Sibylle Loibl; Hope S Rugo; Hiroji Iwata; Pierfranco Conte; Ingrid A Mayer; Bella Kaufman; Toshinari Yamashita; Yen-Shen Lu; Kenichi Inoue; Masato Takahashi; Zsuzsanna Pápai; Anne-Sophie Longin; David Mills; Celine Wilke; Samit Hirawat; Dejan Juric
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughout fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays.

Authors:  L Bubendorf; J Kononen; P Koivisto; P Schraml; H Moch; T C Gasser; N Willi; M J Mihatsch; G Sauter; O P Kallioniemi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Androgen receptor in breast cancer: expression in estrogen receptor-positive tumors and in estrogen receptor-negative tumors with apocrine differentiation.

Authors:  Leo A Niemeier; David J Dabbs; Sushil Beriwal; Joan M Striebel; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Androgen receptor expression and outcomes in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Arnoud J Templeton; Paulo de Gouveia; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Philippe L Bedard; Mustafa Al-Mubarak; Bostjan Seruga; Ian F Tannock; Alberto Ocana; Eitan Amir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Jiang Li; William H Gray; Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Yu Shyr; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2012-07-24

9.  The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote.

Authors:  Yang Liao; Gordon K Smyth; Wei Shi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Clinical validation of the Tempus xO assay.

Authors:  Nike Beaubier; Robert Tell; Robert Huether; Martin Bontrager; Stephen Bush; Jerod Parsons; Kaanan Shah; Tim Baker; Gene Selkov; Tim Taxter; Amber Thomas; Sam Bettis; Aly Khan; Denise Lau; Christina Lee; Matthew Barber; Marcin Cieslik; Casey Frankenberger; Amy Franzen; Ali Weiner; Gary Palmer; Robert Lonigro; Dan Robinson; Yi-Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Eric Lefkofsky; Arul Chinnaiyan; Kevin P White
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-25
View more
  37 in total

1.  Identifying High-Risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Molecular Subtyping.

Authors:  Carolin Hartung; Martin Porsch; Kathrin Stückrath; Sandy Kaufhold; Martin S Staege; Volker Hanf; Tilmann Lantzsch; Christoph Uleer; Susanne Peschel; Jutta John; Marleen Pöhler; Edith Weigert; Jörg Buchmann; Karl-Friedrich Bürrig; Kathleen Schüler; Daniel Bethmann; Ivo Große; Eva Johanna Kantelhardt; Christoph Thomssen; Martina Vetter
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Molecular Analysis of Luminal Androgen Receptor Reveals Activated Pathways and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Stefania Stella; Silvia Rita Vitale; Michele Massimino; Gianmarco Motta; Claudio Longhitano; Katia Lanzafame; Federica Martorana; Carmine Fazzari; Giada Maria Vecchio; Elena Tirrò; Nicola Inzerilli; Rosaria Carciotto; Livia Manzella; Michele Caruso; Paolo Vigneri
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.395

3.  Adjuvant enzalutamide for the treatment of early-stage androgen-receptor positive, triple-negative breast cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Elaine M Walsh; Ayca Gucalp; Sujata Patil; Marcia Edelweiss; Dara S Ross; Pedram Razavi; Shanu Modi; Neil M Iyengar; Rachel Sanford; Tiffany Troso-Sandoval; Mila Gorsky; Jacqueline Bromberg; Pamela Drullinsky; Diana Lake; Serena Wong; Patricia Ann DeFusco; Nicholas Lamparella; Ranja Gupta; Tasmila Tabassum; Leigh Ann Boyle; Artavazd Arumov; Tiffany A Traina
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 4.  Emergence of Nanotechnology as a Powerful Cavalry against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).

Authors:  Aiswarya Chaudhuri; Dulla Naveen Kumar; Deepa Dehari; Sanjay Singh; Pradeep Kumar; Pradeep Kumar Bolla; Dinesh Kumar; Ashish Kumar Agrawal
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 5.  PI3K Inhibitors in Cancer: Clinical Implications and Adverse Effects.

Authors:  Rosalin Mishra; Hima Patel; Samar Alanazi; Mary Kate Kilroy; Joan T Garrett
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Clinical outcomes and prognostic biomarkers among pregnant, post-partum and nulliparous women with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Jerzak; Nechama Lipton; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Dina Boles; Elzbieta Slodkowska; Gregory R Pond; Ellen Warner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

Review 8.  Triple-negative breast cancer: A run-through of features, classification and current therapies.

Authors:  Meghana Manjunath; Bibha Choudhary
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Breast Tumors With an Identity Crisis.

Authors:  Sara E Nunnery; Ingrid A Mayer; Justin M Balko
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 10.  Obesity and Androgen Receptor Signaling: Associations and Potential Crosstalk in Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Nelson Rangel; Victoria E Villegas; Milena Rondón-Lagos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.